Table 2.

Complications Observed With Latissimus Dorsi Flap Reconstruction of the Breasta

No. (%)bS-LD + ImplantMS-LD + ImplantALD
Patients82351829
Flap procedures85371929
Flap-related complicationsc
 Mastectomy skin flap necrosis5 (6)212
 Minor skin paddle necrosis3 (4)210
 Implant malposition2 (2)11NA
 Liponecrosis2 (2)NANA2
 Rippling1 (1)10NA
 Total13 (15)634
Donor site complicationsd
 Seromae15 (18)2013
 Delayed wound healing3 (4)300
 Wound necrosis and dehiscencee3 (4)003
 Hematoma2 (2)101
 Minor wound dehiscence1 (1)010
 Total24 (28)6117
No. (%)bS-LD + ImplantMS-LD + ImplantALD
Patients82351829
Flap procedures85371929
Flap-related complicationsc
 Mastectomy skin flap necrosis5 (6)212
 Minor skin paddle necrosis3 (4)210
 Implant malposition2 (2)11NA
 Liponecrosis2 (2)NANA2
 Rippling1 (1)10NA
 Total13 (15)634
Donor site complicationsd
 Seromae15 (18)2013
 Delayed wound healing3 (4)300
 Wound necrosis and dehiscencee3 (4)003
 Hematoma2 (2)101
 Minor wound dehiscence1 (1)010
 Total24 (28)6117
a

S-LD, standard latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous; MS-LD, muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi myocutaneous; ALD, autologous latissimus dorsi; NA, not available.

b

Reported as percentage of reconstruction procedures.

c

There were no cases of total or partial flap loss, flap hematoma, flap seroma, capsular contracture, or implant exposure (data were not available about capsular contracture or implant exposure with ALD flap).

d

There were no cases of donor site infection, asymmetry, or impaired shoulder function with any of the three flap procedures.

e

Significant differences were noted between the three latissimus dorsi flap procedures in frequency of donor site seroma (P < .005) and wound necrosis and dehiscence (P < .05); there were no other significant differences in flap-related or donor site complications between the three latissimus dorsi flap procedures.

Table 2.

Complications Observed With Latissimus Dorsi Flap Reconstruction of the Breasta

No. (%)bS-LD + ImplantMS-LD + ImplantALD
Patients82351829
Flap procedures85371929
Flap-related complicationsc
 Mastectomy skin flap necrosis5 (6)212
 Minor skin paddle necrosis3 (4)210
 Implant malposition2 (2)11NA
 Liponecrosis2 (2)NANA2
 Rippling1 (1)10NA
 Total13 (15)634
Donor site complicationsd
 Seromae15 (18)2013
 Delayed wound healing3 (4)300
 Wound necrosis and dehiscencee3 (4)003
 Hematoma2 (2)101
 Minor wound dehiscence1 (1)010
 Total24 (28)6117
No. (%)bS-LD + ImplantMS-LD + ImplantALD
Patients82351829
Flap procedures85371929
Flap-related complicationsc
 Mastectomy skin flap necrosis5 (6)212
 Minor skin paddle necrosis3 (4)210
 Implant malposition2 (2)11NA
 Liponecrosis2 (2)NANA2
 Rippling1 (1)10NA
 Total13 (15)634
Donor site complicationsd
 Seromae15 (18)2013
 Delayed wound healing3 (4)300
 Wound necrosis and dehiscencee3 (4)003
 Hematoma2 (2)101
 Minor wound dehiscence1 (1)010
 Total24 (28)6117
a

S-LD, standard latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous; MS-LD, muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi myocutaneous; ALD, autologous latissimus dorsi; NA, not available.

b

Reported as percentage of reconstruction procedures.

c

There were no cases of total or partial flap loss, flap hematoma, flap seroma, capsular contracture, or implant exposure (data were not available about capsular contracture or implant exposure with ALD flap).

d

There were no cases of donor site infection, asymmetry, or impaired shoulder function with any of the three flap procedures.

e

Significant differences were noted between the three latissimus dorsi flap procedures in frequency of donor site seroma (P < .005) and wound necrosis and dehiscence (P < .05); there were no other significant differences in flap-related or donor site complications between the three latissimus dorsi flap procedures.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close