Table 3.

Test of Parallel Trends before Privatization in the Network Access Sample

VariablesAa
Ba
Cb
Dc
(1)(2)(1)(2)(1)(2)(1)(2)
Time trend0.002−0.0030.010**0.008*0.003−0.0020.006**0.001
(0.002)(0.003)(0.004)(0.005)(0.002)(0.003)(0.002)(0.004)
Time trend by treatment status0.0040.0040.0040.004−0.000−0.005−0.007**−0.010**
(0.004)(0.006)(0.004)(0.006)(0.003)(0.005)(0.003)(0.005)
Education0.0300.0380.0370.041***
(0.027)(0.033)(0.027)(0.015)
(log) Household per capita income0.205*0.234**0.185*0.098
(0.105)(0.107)(0.106)(0.104)
(log) Accumulated precipitation0.052**0.0500.046**0.053***
(0.021)(0.043)(0.021)(0.020)
Year effectsNoYesNoYesNoYesNoYes
Observations416416261261400400270270
Log likelihood−199.18−184.35−126.12−116.78−191.76−176.84−124.75−122.75
Sample period1986–20001993–20001986–20001986–2000
VariablesAa
Ba
Cb
Dc
(1)(2)(1)(2)(1)(2)(1)(2)
Time trend0.002−0.0030.010**0.008*0.003−0.0020.006**0.001
(0.002)(0.003)(0.004)(0.005)(0.002)(0.003)(0.002)(0.004)
Time trend by treatment status0.0040.0040.0040.004−0.000−0.005−0.007**−0.010**
(0.004)(0.006)(0.004)(0.006)(0.003)(0.005)(0.003)(0.005)
Education0.0300.0380.0370.041***
(0.027)(0.033)(0.027)(0.015)
(log) Household per capita income0.205*0.234**0.185*0.098
(0.105)(0.107)(0.106)(0.104)
(log) Accumulated precipitation0.052**0.0500.046**0.053***
(0.021)(0.043)(0.021)(0.020)
Year effectsNoYesNoYesNoYesNoYes
Observations416416261261400400270270
Log likelihood−199.18−184.35−126.12−116.78−191.76−176.84−124.75−122.75
Sample period1986–20001993–20001986–20001986–2000

Note: Estimates are obtained using a Papke & Wooldridge Fractional Logit Model. Marginal effects are reported, and robust standard errors clustered at the city level are reported in parentheses. All models include city fixed effects.

Source: Authors' estimation using ECH and National Meteorology Office data.

*, **, and *** indicate statistical significance at the 10 percent level, 5 percent level, and 1 percent level, respectively.

aTreatment Units (three cities): Maldonado, San Carlos, and Pan de Azúcar; Control Units (32 cities): Artigas, Bella Unión, Canelones, Carmelo, Colonia, Dolores, Durazno, Florida, Fray Bentos, Lascano, Libertad, Melo, Mercedes, Minas, Montevideo, Paso de los Toros, Paysandú, Periferia Canelones, Rivera, Rocha, Rosario, Río Branco, Salto, San José de Mayo, San Ramón, Santa Lucía, Sarandí del Yí, Sarandí Grande, Tacuarembó, Tranqueras, Treinta y Tres, Trinidad, and Young.

bTreatment Unit (one city): Maldonado; same Control Units as in A.

cTreatment Unit (one city): Maldonado; Control Units (17 cities): Artigas, Canelones, Colonia, Durazno, Florida, Fray Bentos, Melo, Mercedes, Minas, Paysandú, Rivera, Rocha, Salto, San José de Mayo, Tacuarembó, Treinta y Tres, and Trinidad.

Table 3.

Test of Parallel Trends before Privatization in the Network Access Sample

VariablesAa
Ba
Cb
Dc
(1)(2)(1)(2)(1)(2)(1)(2)
Time trend0.002−0.0030.010**0.008*0.003−0.0020.006**0.001
(0.002)(0.003)(0.004)(0.005)(0.002)(0.003)(0.002)(0.004)
Time trend by treatment status0.0040.0040.0040.004−0.000−0.005−0.007**−0.010**
(0.004)(0.006)(0.004)(0.006)(0.003)(0.005)(0.003)(0.005)
Education0.0300.0380.0370.041***
(0.027)(0.033)(0.027)(0.015)
(log) Household per capita income0.205*0.234**0.185*0.098
(0.105)(0.107)(0.106)(0.104)
(log) Accumulated precipitation0.052**0.0500.046**0.053***
(0.021)(0.043)(0.021)(0.020)
Year effectsNoYesNoYesNoYesNoYes
Observations416416261261400400270270
Log likelihood−199.18−184.35−126.12−116.78−191.76−176.84−124.75−122.75
Sample period1986–20001993–20001986–20001986–2000
VariablesAa
Ba
Cb
Dc
(1)(2)(1)(2)(1)(2)(1)(2)
Time trend0.002−0.0030.010**0.008*0.003−0.0020.006**0.001
(0.002)(0.003)(0.004)(0.005)(0.002)(0.003)(0.002)(0.004)
Time trend by treatment status0.0040.0040.0040.004−0.000−0.005−0.007**−0.010**
(0.004)(0.006)(0.004)(0.006)(0.003)(0.005)(0.003)(0.005)
Education0.0300.0380.0370.041***
(0.027)(0.033)(0.027)(0.015)
(log) Household per capita income0.205*0.234**0.185*0.098
(0.105)(0.107)(0.106)(0.104)
(log) Accumulated precipitation0.052**0.0500.046**0.053***
(0.021)(0.043)(0.021)(0.020)
Year effectsNoYesNoYesNoYesNoYes
Observations416416261261400400270270
Log likelihood−199.18−184.35−126.12−116.78−191.76−176.84−124.75−122.75
Sample period1986–20001993–20001986–20001986–2000

Note: Estimates are obtained using a Papke & Wooldridge Fractional Logit Model. Marginal effects are reported, and robust standard errors clustered at the city level are reported in parentheses. All models include city fixed effects.

Source: Authors' estimation using ECH and National Meteorology Office data.

*, **, and *** indicate statistical significance at the 10 percent level, 5 percent level, and 1 percent level, respectively.

aTreatment Units (three cities): Maldonado, San Carlos, and Pan de Azúcar; Control Units (32 cities): Artigas, Bella Unión, Canelones, Carmelo, Colonia, Dolores, Durazno, Florida, Fray Bentos, Lascano, Libertad, Melo, Mercedes, Minas, Montevideo, Paso de los Toros, Paysandú, Periferia Canelones, Rivera, Rocha, Rosario, Río Branco, Salto, San José de Mayo, San Ramón, Santa Lucía, Sarandí del Yí, Sarandí Grande, Tacuarembó, Tranqueras, Treinta y Tres, Trinidad, and Young.

bTreatment Unit (one city): Maldonado; same Control Units as in A.

cTreatment Unit (one city): Maldonado; Control Units (17 cities): Artigas, Canelones, Colonia, Durazno, Florida, Fray Bentos, Melo, Mercedes, Minas, Paysandú, Rivera, Rocha, Salto, San José de Mayo, Tacuarembó, Treinta y Tres, and Trinidad.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close