. | Schooling level of household head . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | None . | Some primary . | Complete primary . | Some secondary . | Some tertiary . |
% of households, 1997 | 26.90 | 40.50 | 6.40 | 22.70 | 3.60 |
Change in fees per pupil, 1997-2006 ($) | −2.50 | −3.00 | −4.60 | −10.40 | −25.50 |
FPE grant per pupil ($) | 11.90 | 11.90 | 11.90 | 11.90 | 11.90 |
Scenario 1: EMIS data, perfect sorting | |||||
TPR change | −0.0016 | −0.0053 | −0.0084 | −0.0128 | −0.0313 |
Monetary value of TPR change ($) | −4.99 | −16.52 | −26.34 | −40.37 | −98.35 |
Net change in funding per pupil ($) | 6.51 | −5.52 | −16.94 | −36.77 | −109.85 |
Scenario 2: survey data, perfect sorting | |||||
TPR change | 0.0023 | −0.0001 | −0.0023 | −0.0056 | −0.0194 |
Monetary value of TPR change ($) | 7.29 | −0.47 | −7.09 | −17.50 | −61.12 |
Net change in funding per pupil ($) | 18.79 | 10.53 | 2.31 | −13.90 | −72.62 |
Scenario 3: survey data, no sorting | |||||
TPR change | −0.0003 | −0.0003 | −0.0003 | −0.0003 | −0.0003 |
Monetary value of TPR change ($) | −0.89 | −0.89 | −0.89 | −0.89 | −0.89 |
Net change in funding per pupil ($) | 10.61 | 10.11 | 8.51 | 2.71 | −12.39 |
. | Schooling level of household head . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | None . | Some primary . | Complete primary . | Some secondary . | Some tertiary . |
% of households, 1997 | 26.90 | 40.50 | 6.40 | 22.70 | 3.60 |
Change in fees per pupil, 1997-2006 ($) | −2.50 | −3.00 | −4.60 | −10.40 | −25.50 |
FPE grant per pupil ($) | 11.90 | 11.90 | 11.90 | 11.90 | 11.90 |
Scenario 1: EMIS data, perfect sorting | |||||
TPR change | −0.0016 | −0.0053 | −0.0084 | −0.0128 | −0.0313 |
Monetary value of TPR change ($) | −4.99 | −16.52 | −26.34 | −40.37 | −98.35 |
Net change in funding per pupil ($) | 6.51 | −5.52 | −16.94 | −36.77 | −109.85 |
Scenario 2: survey data, perfect sorting | |||||
TPR change | 0.0023 | −0.0001 | −0.0023 | −0.0056 | −0.0194 |
Monetary value of TPR change ($) | 7.29 | −0.47 | −7.09 | −17.50 | −61.12 |
Net change in funding per pupil ($) | 18.79 | 10.53 | 2.31 | −13.90 | −72.62 |
Scenario 3: survey data, no sorting | |||||
TPR change | −0.0003 | −0.0003 | −0.0003 | −0.0003 | −0.0003 |
Monetary value of TPR change ($) | −0.89 | −0.89 | −0.89 | −0.89 | −0.89 |
Net change in funding per pupil ($) | 10.61 | 10.11 | 8.51 | 2.71 | −12.39 |
Source: Authors’ calculations as described in the text. Fee levels are based on the 1997 Welfare Monitoring Survey and 2006 Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey. Pupil teacher ratios are based on administrative data from the Education Monitoring Information System (EMIS) for 2002 and 2005. Salary figures are taken from the Kenya National Examination Council KNEC10.
. | Schooling level of household head . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | None . | Some primary . | Complete primary . | Some secondary . | Some tertiary . |
% of households, 1997 | 26.90 | 40.50 | 6.40 | 22.70 | 3.60 |
Change in fees per pupil, 1997-2006 ($) | −2.50 | −3.00 | −4.60 | −10.40 | −25.50 |
FPE grant per pupil ($) | 11.90 | 11.90 | 11.90 | 11.90 | 11.90 |
Scenario 1: EMIS data, perfect sorting | |||||
TPR change | −0.0016 | −0.0053 | −0.0084 | −0.0128 | −0.0313 |
Monetary value of TPR change ($) | −4.99 | −16.52 | −26.34 | −40.37 | −98.35 |
Net change in funding per pupil ($) | 6.51 | −5.52 | −16.94 | −36.77 | −109.85 |
Scenario 2: survey data, perfect sorting | |||||
TPR change | 0.0023 | −0.0001 | −0.0023 | −0.0056 | −0.0194 |
Monetary value of TPR change ($) | 7.29 | −0.47 | −7.09 | −17.50 | −61.12 |
Net change in funding per pupil ($) | 18.79 | 10.53 | 2.31 | −13.90 | −72.62 |
Scenario 3: survey data, no sorting | |||||
TPR change | −0.0003 | −0.0003 | −0.0003 | −0.0003 | −0.0003 |
Monetary value of TPR change ($) | −0.89 | −0.89 | −0.89 | −0.89 | −0.89 |
Net change in funding per pupil ($) | 10.61 | 10.11 | 8.51 | 2.71 | −12.39 |
. | Schooling level of household head . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | None . | Some primary . | Complete primary . | Some secondary . | Some tertiary . |
% of households, 1997 | 26.90 | 40.50 | 6.40 | 22.70 | 3.60 |
Change in fees per pupil, 1997-2006 ($) | −2.50 | −3.00 | −4.60 | −10.40 | −25.50 |
FPE grant per pupil ($) | 11.90 | 11.90 | 11.90 | 11.90 | 11.90 |
Scenario 1: EMIS data, perfect sorting | |||||
TPR change | −0.0016 | −0.0053 | −0.0084 | −0.0128 | −0.0313 |
Monetary value of TPR change ($) | −4.99 | −16.52 | −26.34 | −40.37 | −98.35 |
Net change in funding per pupil ($) | 6.51 | −5.52 | −16.94 | −36.77 | −109.85 |
Scenario 2: survey data, perfect sorting | |||||
TPR change | 0.0023 | −0.0001 | −0.0023 | −0.0056 | −0.0194 |
Monetary value of TPR change ($) | 7.29 | −0.47 | −7.09 | −17.50 | −61.12 |
Net change in funding per pupil ($) | 18.79 | 10.53 | 2.31 | −13.90 | −72.62 |
Scenario 3: survey data, no sorting | |||||
TPR change | −0.0003 | −0.0003 | −0.0003 | −0.0003 | −0.0003 |
Monetary value of TPR change ($) | −0.89 | −0.89 | −0.89 | −0.89 | −0.89 |
Net change in funding per pupil ($) | 10.61 | 10.11 | 8.51 | 2.71 | −12.39 |
Source: Authors’ calculations as described in the text. Fee levels are based on the 1997 Welfare Monitoring Survey and 2006 Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey. Pupil teacher ratios are based on administrative data from the Education Monitoring Information System (EMIS) for 2002 and 2005. Salary figures are taken from the Kenya National Examination Council KNEC10.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.