Table 5.

Changes in Per-Pupil Funding in Public Schools, Before/After FPE

Schooling level of household head
NoneSome primaryComplete primarySome secondarySome tertiary
% of households, 199726.9040.506.4022.703.60
Change in fees per pupil, 1997-2006 ($)−2.50−3.00−4.60−10.40−25.50
FPE grant per pupil ($)11.9011.9011.9011.9011.90
Scenario 1: EMIS data, perfect sorting
TPR change−0.0016−0.0053−0.0084−0.0128−0.0313
Monetary value of TPR change ($)−4.99−16.52−26.34−40.37−98.35
Net change in funding per pupil ($)6.51−5.52−16.94−36.77−109.85
Scenario 2: survey data, perfect sorting
TPR change0.0023−0.0001−0.0023−0.0056−0.0194
Monetary value of TPR change ($)7.29−0.47−7.09−17.50−61.12
Net change in funding per pupil ($)18.7910.532.31−13.90−72.62
Scenario 3: survey data, no sorting
TPR change−0.0003−0.0003−0.0003−0.0003−0.0003
Monetary value of TPR change ($)−0.89−0.89−0.89−0.89−0.89
Net change in funding per pupil ($)10.6110.118.512.71−12.39
Schooling level of household head
NoneSome primaryComplete primarySome secondarySome tertiary
% of households, 199726.9040.506.4022.703.60
Change in fees per pupil, 1997-2006 ($)−2.50−3.00−4.60−10.40−25.50
FPE grant per pupil ($)11.9011.9011.9011.9011.90
Scenario 1: EMIS data, perfect sorting
TPR change−0.0016−0.0053−0.0084−0.0128−0.0313
Monetary value of TPR change ($)−4.99−16.52−26.34−40.37−98.35
Net change in funding per pupil ($)6.51−5.52−16.94−36.77−109.85
Scenario 2: survey data, perfect sorting
TPR change0.0023−0.0001−0.0023−0.0056−0.0194
Monetary value of TPR change ($)7.29−0.47−7.09−17.50−61.12
Net change in funding per pupil ($)18.7910.532.31−13.90−72.62
Scenario 3: survey data, no sorting
TPR change−0.0003−0.0003−0.0003−0.0003−0.0003
Monetary value of TPR change ($)−0.89−0.89−0.89−0.89−0.89
Net change in funding per pupil ($)10.6110.118.512.71−12.39

Source: Authors’ calculations as described in the text. Fee levels are based on the 1997 Welfare Monitoring Survey and 2006 Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey. Pupil teacher ratios are based on administrative data from the Education Monitoring Information System (EMIS) for 2002 and 2005. Salary figures are taken from the Kenya National Examination Council KNEC10.

Table 5.

Changes in Per-Pupil Funding in Public Schools, Before/After FPE

Schooling level of household head
NoneSome primaryComplete primarySome secondarySome tertiary
% of households, 199726.9040.506.4022.703.60
Change in fees per pupil, 1997-2006 ($)−2.50−3.00−4.60−10.40−25.50
FPE grant per pupil ($)11.9011.9011.9011.9011.90
Scenario 1: EMIS data, perfect sorting
TPR change−0.0016−0.0053−0.0084−0.0128−0.0313
Monetary value of TPR change ($)−4.99−16.52−26.34−40.37−98.35
Net change in funding per pupil ($)6.51−5.52−16.94−36.77−109.85
Scenario 2: survey data, perfect sorting
TPR change0.0023−0.0001−0.0023−0.0056−0.0194
Monetary value of TPR change ($)7.29−0.47−7.09−17.50−61.12
Net change in funding per pupil ($)18.7910.532.31−13.90−72.62
Scenario 3: survey data, no sorting
TPR change−0.0003−0.0003−0.0003−0.0003−0.0003
Monetary value of TPR change ($)−0.89−0.89−0.89−0.89−0.89
Net change in funding per pupil ($)10.6110.118.512.71−12.39
Schooling level of household head
NoneSome primaryComplete primarySome secondarySome tertiary
% of households, 199726.9040.506.4022.703.60
Change in fees per pupil, 1997-2006 ($)−2.50−3.00−4.60−10.40−25.50
FPE grant per pupil ($)11.9011.9011.9011.9011.90
Scenario 1: EMIS data, perfect sorting
TPR change−0.0016−0.0053−0.0084−0.0128−0.0313
Monetary value of TPR change ($)−4.99−16.52−26.34−40.37−98.35
Net change in funding per pupil ($)6.51−5.52−16.94−36.77−109.85
Scenario 2: survey data, perfect sorting
TPR change0.0023−0.0001−0.0023−0.0056−0.0194
Monetary value of TPR change ($)7.29−0.47−7.09−17.50−61.12
Net change in funding per pupil ($)18.7910.532.31−13.90−72.62
Scenario 3: survey data, no sorting
TPR change−0.0003−0.0003−0.0003−0.0003−0.0003
Monetary value of TPR change ($)−0.89−0.89−0.89−0.89−0.89
Net change in funding per pupil ($)10.6110.118.512.71−12.39

Source: Authors’ calculations as described in the text. Fee levels are based on the 1997 Welfare Monitoring Survey and 2006 Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey. Pupil teacher ratios are based on administrative data from the Education Monitoring Information System (EMIS) for 2002 and 2005. Salary figures are taken from the Kenya National Examination Council KNEC10.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close