Table 4.

Impact of Conflict Intensity on Completed Years of Education, 5- to 14-year-olds

(1)(2)(3)(4)
Explained Variable and SampleYears of Education Female 5–14Years of Education Male 5–14Years of Education Female 5–14 – Mother here since 1996Years of Education Male 5–14 – Mother here since 1996

SpecificationEq. (2R)Eq. (2R)Eq. (2R)Eq. (2R)
District casualties before survey0.2795**0.12240.2633**0.0755
(CONFEXPsij)(0.1147)(0.1207)(0.1172)(0.1391)
= 1 if rural−0.3916***−0.1559**−0.4703***−0.1770**
(0.0788)(0.0664)(0.0914)(0.0703)
= 1 if head has primary education0.2210***0.2301***0.2051***0.2381***
(0.0428)(0.0361)(0.0453)(0.0374)
= 1 if head has secondary education0.8263***0.7064***0.8619***0.7242***
(0.0431)(0.0386)(0.0509)(0.0388)
= 1 if head has higher education1.1291***1.0828***1.3829***1.2016***
(0.1035)(0.0846)(0.1137)(0.1124)
Panel variableDistrictDistrictDistrictDistrict
Included dummies:
DHS 2006YesYesYesYes
Age at interviewYesYesYesYes
Region × DHS 2006YesYesYesYes
DHS 2006 × Age at interviewYesYesYesYes
Region × Age at interviewYesYesYesYes
DHS 2006 × Region × Age at interviewYesYesYesYes
Observations11,79312,1169,7729,959
No. of clusters69a69a69a69a
R-Squared0.50620.60770.49090.5996
p value male vs. femaleb0.0790.065
(1)(2)(3)(4)
Explained Variable and SampleYears of Education Female 5–14Years of Education Male 5–14Years of Education Female 5–14 – Mother here since 1996Years of Education Male 5–14 – Mother here since 1996

SpecificationEq. (2R)Eq. (2R)Eq. (2R)Eq. (2R)
District casualties before survey0.2795**0.12240.2633**0.0755
(CONFEXPsij)(0.1147)(0.1207)(0.1172)(0.1391)
= 1 if rural−0.3916***−0.1559**−0.4703***−0.1770**
(0.0788)(0.0664)(0.0914)(0.0703)
= 1 if head has primary education0.2210***0.2301***0.2051***0.2381***
(0.0428)(0.0361)(0.0453)(0.0374)
= 1 if head has secondary education0.8263***0.7064***0.8619***0.7242***
(0.0431)(0.0386)(0.0509)(0.0388)
= 1 if head has higher education1.1291***1.0828***1.3829***1.2016***
(0.1035)(0.0846)(0.1137)(0.1124)
Panel variableDistrictDistrictDistrictDistrict
Included dummies:
DHS 2006YesYesYesYes
Age at interviewYesYesYesYes
Region × DHS 2006YesYesYesYes
DHS 2006 × Age at interviewYesYesYesYes
Region × Age at interviewYesYesYesYes
DHS 2006 × Region × Age at interviewYesYesYesYes
Observations11,79312,1169,7729,959
No. of clusters69a69a69a69a
R-Squared0.50620.60770.49090.5996
p value male vs. femaleb0.0790.065

Notes: All specifications are estimated using the panel fixed-effects estimator and include a constant. District casualties are expressed per 1,000 inhabitants. Sample only includes individuals surveyed in the Nepal DHS 2001 and 2006 and aged 5–14 years at the time of the survey. In columns (3) and (4), the 2006 sample is restricted to individuals whose mothers were interviewed individually and whose mothers reported having lived in their current place of residence as of 1996. The same exclusion could not be implemented for the 2001 DHS because individuals listed on the household roster cannot be matched to their mothers. Standard errors clustered at the district level are in parentheses. * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01.

aDHS data collection was somewhat affected by the conflict in 2001. Hence, contrary to DHS 2006, four districts were not covered: Dolpa, Jajarkot, Rolpa, and Rukhum. The small districts of Manang and Mustang were not surveyed, but these districts did not experience any casualties during the conflict.

b p value of an F test of equality between the reported treatment effects for males and females.

Source:INSEC 2009, Central Bureau of Statistics 2009, Nepal DHS 2001, and Nepal DHS 2006.

Table 4.

Impact of Conflict Intensity on Completed Years of Education, 5- to 14-year-olds

(1)(2)(3)(4)
Explained Variable and SampleYears of Education Female 5–14Years of Education Male 5–14Years of Education Female 5–14 – Mother here since 1996Years of Education Male 5–14 – Mother here since 1996

SpecificationEq. (2R)Eq. (2R)Eq. (2R)Eq. (2R)
District casualties before survey0.2795**0.12240.2633**0.0755
(CONFEXPsij)(0.1147)(0.1207)(0.1172)(0.1391)
= 1 if rural−0.3916***−0.1559**−0.4703***−0.1770**
(0.0788)(0.0664)(0.0914)(0.0703)
= 1 if head has primary education0.2210***0.2301***0.2051***0.2381***
(0.0428)(0.0361)(0.0453)(0.0374)
= 1 if head has secondary education0.8263***0.7064***0.8619***0.7242***
(0.0431)(0.0386)(0.0509)(0.0388)
= 1 if head has higher education1.1291***1.0828***1.3829***1.2016***
(0.1035)(0.0846)(0.1137)(0.1124)
Panel variableDistrictDistrictDistrictDistrict
Included dummies:
DHS 2006YesYesYesYes
Age at interviewYesYesYesYes
Region × DHS 2006YesYesYesYes
DHS 2006 × Age at interviewYesYesYesYes
Region × Age at interviewYesYesYesYes
DHS 2006 × Region × Age at interviewYesYesYesYes
Observations11,79312,1169,7729,959
No. of clusters69a69a69a69a
R-Squared0.50620.60770.49090.5996
p value male vs. femaleb0.0790.065
(1)(2)(3)(4)
Explained Variable and SampleYears of Education Female 5–14Years of Education Male 5–14Years of Education Female 5–14 – Mother here since 1996Years of Education Male 5–14 – Mother here since 1996

SpecificationEq. (2R)Eq. (2R)Eq. (2R)Eq. (2R)
District casualties before survey0.2795**0.12240.2633**0.0755
(CONFEXPsij)(0.1147)(0.1207)(0.1172)(0.1391)
= 1 if rural−0.3916***−0.1559**−0.4703***−0.1770**
(0.0788)(0.0664)(0.0914)(0.0703)
= 1 if head has primary education0.2210***0.2301***0.2051***0.2381***
(0.0428)(0.0361)(0.0453)(0.0374)
= 1 if head has secondary education0.8263***0.7064***0.8619***0.7242***
(0.0431)(0.0386)(0.0509)(0.0388)
= 1 if head has higher education1.1291***1.0828***1.3829***1.2016***
(0.1035)(0.0846)(0.1137)(0.1124)
Panel variableDistrictDistrictDistrictDistrict
Included dummies:
DHS 2006YesYesYesYes
Age at interviewYesYesYesYes
Region × DHS 2006YesYesYesYes
DHS 2006 × Age at interviewYesYesYesYes
Region × Age at interviewYesYesYesYes
DHS 2006 × Region × Age at interviewYesYesYesYes
Observations11,79312,1169,7729,959
No. of clusters69a69a69a69a
R-Squared0.50620.60770.49090.5996
p value male vs. femaleb0.0790.065

Notes: All specifications are estimated using the panel fixed-effects estimator and include a constant. District casualties are expressed per 1,000 inhabitants. Sample only includes individuals surveyed in the Nepal DHS 2001 and 2006 and aged 5–14 years at the time of the survey. In columns (3) and (4), the 2006 sample is restricted to individuals whose mothers were interviewed individually and whose mothers reported having lived in their current place of residence as of 1996. The same exclusion could not be implemented for the 2001 DHS because individuals listed on the household roster cannot be matched to their mothers. Standard errors clustered at the district level are in parentheses. * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01.

aDHS data collection was somewhat affected by the conflict in 2001. Hence, contrary to DHS 2006, four districts were not covered: Dolpa, Jajarkot, Rolpa, and Rukhum. The small districts of Manang and Mustang were not surveyed, but these districts did not experience any casualties during the conflict.

b p value of an F test of equality between the reported treatment effects for males and females.

Source:INSEC 2009, Central Bureau of Statistics 2009, Nepal DHS 2001, and Nepal DHS 2006.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close