Table 10.1.1.4
Adverse event proportions in a meta-analysis of elderly subjects treated with growth hormone versus those not treated with growth hormone
Adverse event Studies, n Growth hormone-treated participants Nongrowth hormone-treated participants
Mean proportion (Range), %a Participants, n Mean proportion (Range), %a Participants, n

Soft tissue oedemab

15

50 (23–89)

194

8 (0–25)

194

Carpal tunnel syndromeb

16

19 (0–50)

244

1 (0–7)

212

Arthralgiasb

14

21 (0–50)

181

5 (0–25)

186

Gynaecomastiac

3

6 (0–12)

95

0 (0–0)

63

New IFG, IGT, or DM

4

22 (6–53)

100

14 (0–25)

69

New DM

4

5 (0–12)

100

1 (0–5)

69

Adverse event Studies, n Growth hormone-treated participants Nongrowth hormone-treated participants
Mean proportion (Range), %a Participants, n Mean proportion (Range), %a Participants, n

Soft tissue oedemab

15

50 (23–89)

194

8 (0–25)

194

Carpal tunnel syndromeb

16

19 (0–50)

244

1 (0–7)

212

Arthralgiasb

14

21 (0–50)

181

5 (0–25)

186

Gynaecomastiac

3

6 (0–12)

95

0 (0–0)

63

New IFG, IGT, or DM

4

22 (6–53)

100

14 (0–25)

69

New DM

4

5 (0–12)

100

1 (0–5)

69

a

Mean proportion weighted by study size.

b

P < 0.001 for comparison between groups.

c

P < 0.05 for comparison between groups.

DM, diabetes mellitus; IFG, impaired fasting glucose; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance.

Adapted with permission from Liu H, Bravata DM, Olkin I, Nayak S, Roberts B, Garber AM, et al. Systematic review: the safety and efficacy of growth hormone in the healthy elderly. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 104–15 (35).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close