Average absolute change Δ in load/ha by a glyphosate ban in silage maize production (standard deviation in brackets, relative changes in italics.)a,b
load: . | ΔΛtoxy . | ΔΛfate . | ΔΛheal . | ΔΛtotal . |
---|---|---|---|---|
P [€/dt]: . | ||||
4.00 | −0.011 (0.006) | −0.019 (0.061) | −0.170 (0.023) | −0.200 (0.069) |
*** | *** | *** | *** | |
−3.9% | −1.4% | −62.5% | −9.3% | |
4.60 | −0.011 (0.008) | −0.011 (0.091) | −0.175 (0.015) | −0.196 (0.092) |
*** | *** | *** | *** | |
−4.1% | −1.3% | −58.5% | −11.1% | |
5.20 | −0.012 (0.004) | −0.025 (0.043) | −0.174 (0.011) | −0.211 (0.045) |
*** | *** | *** | *** | |
−4.6% | −3.3% | −56.0% | −12.9% |
load: . | ΔΛtoxy . | ΔΛfate . | ΔΛheal . | ΔΛtotal . |
---|---|---|---|---|
P [€/dt]: . | ||||
4.00 | −0.011 (0.006) | −0.019 (0.061) | −0.170 (0.023) | −0.200 (0.069) |
*** | *** | *** | *** | |
−3.9% | −1.4% | −62.5% | −9.3% | |
4.60 | −0.011 (0.008) | −0.011 (0.091) | −0.175 (0.015) | −0.196 (0.092) |
*** | *** | *** | *** | |
−4.1% | −1.3% | −58.5% | −11.1% | |
5.20 | −0.012 (0.004) | −0.025 (0.043) | −0.174 (0.011) | −0.211 (0.045) |
*** | *** | *** | *** | |
−4.6% | −3.3% | −56.0% | −12.9% |
aDifference of load/ha for the glyphosate licensed scenarios minus the glyphosate banned scenarios. Only municipalities are included in which glyphosate is used in the model under the licensed scenario (ra = 0.5).
b*, ** and *** denote significance at the 5 per cent, 1 per cent and 0.1 per cent levels, respectively, based on Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests.
Average absolute change Δ in load/ha by a glyphosate ban in silage maize production (standard deviation in brackets, relative changes in italics.)a,b
load: . | ΔΛtoxy . | ΔΛfate . | ΔΛheal . | ΔΛtotal . |
---|---|---|---|---|
P [€/dt]: . | ||||
4.00 | −0.011 (0.006) | −0.019 (0.061) | −0.170 (0.023) | −0.200 (0.069) |
*** | *** | *** | *** | |
−3.9% | −1.4% | −62.5% | −9.3% | |
4.60 | −0.011 (0.008) | −0.011 (0.091) | −0.175 (0.015) | −0.196 (0.092) |
*** | *** | *** | *** | |
−4.1% | −1.3% | −58.5% | −11.1% | |
5.20 | −0.012 (0.004) | −0.025 (0.043) | −0.174 (0.011) | −0.211 (0.045) |
*** | *** | *** | *** | |
−4.6% | −3.3% | −56.0% | −12.9% |
load: . | ΔΛtoxy . | ΔΛfate . | ΔΛheal . | ΔΛtotal . |
---|---|---|---|---|
P [€/dt]: . | ||||
4.00 | −0.011 (0.006) | −0.019 (0.061) | −0.170 (0.023) | −0.200 (0.069) |
*** | *** | *** | *** | |
−3.9% | −1.4% | −62.5% | −9.3% | |
4.60 | −0.011 (0.008) | −0.011 (0.091) | −0.175 (0.015) | −0.196 (0.092) |
*** | *** | *** | *** | |
−4.1% | −1.3% | −58.5% | −11.1% | |
5.20 | −0.012 (0.004) | −0.025 (0.043) | −0.174 (0.011) | −0.211 (0.045) |
*** | *** | *** | *** | |
−4.6% | −3.3% | −56.0% | −12.9% |
aDifference of load/ha for the glyphosate licensed scenarios minus the glyphosate banned scenarios. Only municipalities are included in which glyphosate is used in the model under the licensed scenario (ra = 0.5).
b*, ** and *** denote significance at the 5 per cent, 1 per cent and 0.1 per cent levels, respectively, based on Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.