Table 4.

Average absolute change Δ in load/ha by a glyphosate ban in silage maize production (standard deviation in brackets, relative changes in italics.)a,b

load:ΔΛtoxyΔΛfateΔΛhealΔΛtotal
P [€/dt]:
4.00−0.011 (0.006)−0.019 (0.061)−0.170 (0.023)−0.200 (0.069)
************
3.9%1.4%62.5%9.3%
4.60−0.011 (0.008)−0.011 (0.091)−0.175 (0.015)−0.196 (0.092)
************
4.1%1.3%58.5%11.1%
5.20−0.012 (0.004)−0.025 (0.043)−0.174 (0.011)−0.211 (0.045)
************
4.6%3.3%56.0%12.9%
load:ΔΛtoxyΔΛfateΔΛhealΔΛtotal
P [€/dt]:
4.00−0.011 (0.006)−0.019 (0.061)−0.170 (0.023)−0.200 (0.069)
************
3.9%1.4%62.5%9.3%
4.60−0.011 (0.008)−0.011 (0.091)−0.175 (0.015)−0.196 (0.092)
************
4.1%1.3%58.5%11.1%
5.20−0.012 (0.004)−0.025 (0.043)−0.174 (0.011)−0.211 (0.045)
************
4.6%3.3%56.0%12.9%

aDifference of load/ha for the glyphosate licensed scenarios minus the glyphosate banned scenarios. Only municipalities are included in which glyphosate is used in the model under the licensed scenario (ra = 0.5).

b*, ** and *** denote significance at the 5 per cent, 1 per cent and 0.1 per cent levels, respectively, based on Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests.

Table 4.

Average absolute change Δ in load/ha by a glyphosate ban in silage maize production (standard deviation in brackets, relative changes in italics.)a,b

load:ΔΛtoxyΔΛfateΔΛhealΔΛtotal
P [€/dt]:
4.00−0.011 (0.006)−0.019 (0.061)−0.170 (0.023)−0.200 (0.069)
************
3.9%1.4%62.5%9.3%
4.60−0.011 (0.008)−0.011 (0.091)−0.175 (0.015)−0.196 (0.092)
************
4.1%1.3%58.5%11.1%
5.20−0.012 (0.004)−0.025 (0.043)−0.174 (0.011)−0.211 (0.045)
************
4.6%3.3%56.0%12.9%
load:ΔΛtoxyΔΛfateΔΛhealΔΛtotal
P [€/dt]:
4.00−0.011 (0.006)−0.019 (0.061)−0.170 (0.023)−0.200 (0.069)
************
3.9%1.4%62.5%9.3%
4.60−0.011 (0.008)−0.011 (0.091)−0.175 (0.015)−0.196 (0.092)
************
4.1%1.3%58.5%11.1%
5.20−0.012 (0.004)−0.025 (0.043)−0.174 (0.011)−0.211 (0.045)
************
4.6%3.3%56.0%12.9%

aDifference of load/ha for the glyphosate licensed scenarios minus the glyphosate banned scenarios. Only municipalities are included in which glyphosate is used in the model under the licensed scenario (ra = 0.5).

b*, ** and *** denote significance at the 5 per cent, 1 per cent and 0.1 per cent levels, respectively, based on Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close