Table 2. Open in new tab Decomposition...

	Total (1)	Within (2)	Between (3)
	1994–2001
Female	.021	.028	−.007
Male	.039	.027	.012
	1994–1998
Female	.006	.017	−.011
Male	.028	.017	.011
	1998–2001
Female	.012	.011	.002
Male	.011	.007	.004

	Total (1)	Within (2)	Between (3)
	1994–2001
Female	.021	.028	−.007
Male	.039	.027	.012
	1994–1998
Female	.006	.017	−.011
Male	.028	.017	.011
	1998–2001
Female	.012	.011	.002
Male	.011	.007	.004

Table 2.

Decomposition across Four-Digit Manufacturing Sectors

	Total (1)	Within (2)	Between (3)
	1994–2001
Female	.021	.028	−.007
Male	.039	.027	.012
	1994–1998
Female	.006	.017	−.011
Male	.028	.017	.011
	1998–2001
Female	.012	.011	.002
Male	.011	.007	.004

	Total (1)	Within (2)	Between (3)
	1994–2001
Female	.021	.028	−.007
Male	.039	.027	.012
	1994–1998
Female	.006	.017	−.011
Male	.028	.017	.011
	1998–2001
Female	.012	.011	.002
Male	.011	.007	.004

Source: Authors’ calculations based on the National Urban Employment Survey from the National Institute of Statistics and Geography, Mexico.

Note: More than 250 four-digit sectors. Only manufacturing sectors. Numbers multiplied by 100 represents changes in percentage points. For example, the share of formal employees among female employees increased by 2.1 percentage points in manufacturing industries between 1994 and 2001.

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only