Sensitivity analysis by omitting non-randomized studies (without the Li et al., 2015 study).
. | Original analysis . | . | . | Sensitivity analysis . | . | . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outcome . | n . | Effect (95% CI) . | P . | n . | Effect (95% CI) . | P . |
Treatment duration (months) | 7 | MD: –0.55 (–3.73, 2.63) | 0.73 | 2 | MD: 2.69 (–4.97, 10.35) | 0.49 |
ABO-OGS total score | 2 | MD: 13.38 (9.45, 17.31) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS failure (score>30) | 2 | RR: 1.63 (1.24, 2.13) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: alignment | 2 | MD: 2.60 (–0.48, 5.69) | 0.10 | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: marginal ridges | 2 | MD: 0.60 (–0.22, 1.43) | 0.15 | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: buccolingual inclination | 2 | MD: 1.14 (0.21, 2.07) | 0.02† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: occlusal contacts | 2 | MD: 4.45 (2.72, 6.18) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: occlusal relationship | 2 | MD: 1.39 (–0.12, 2.89) | 0.07 | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: overjet | 2 | MD: 2.61 (1.29, 3.93) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: interproximal contacts | 2 | MD: 0.02 (–0.17, 0.21) | 0.83 | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: root angulation | 2 | MD: 0.87 (0.46, 1.28) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
PAR post-Tx | 2 | MD: –0.03 (–2.02, 1.96) | 0.98 | 0 | - | |
PAR reduction via Tx | 3 | MD: –1.76 (–3.62, 0.10) | 0.06 | 0 | - |
. | Original analysis . | . | . | Sensitivity analysis . | . | . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outcome . | n . | Effect (95% CI) . | P . | n . | Effect (95% CI) . | P . |
Treatment duration (months) | 7 | MD: –0.55 (–3.73, 2.63) | 0.73 | 2 | MD: 2.69 (–4.97, 10.35) | 0.49 |
ABO-OGS total score | 2 | MD: 13.38 (9.45, 17.31) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS failure (score>30) | 2 | RR: 1.63 (1.24, 2.13) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: alignment | 2 | MD: 2.60 (–0.48, 5.69) | 0.10 | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: marginal ridges | 2 | MD: 0.60 (–0.22, 1.43) | 0.15 | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: buccolingual inclination | 2 | MD: 1.14 (0.21, 2.07) | 0.02† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: occlusal contacts | 2 | MD: 4.45 (2.72, 6.18) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: occlusal relationship | 2 | MD: 1.39 (–0.12, 2.89) | 0.07 | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: overjet | 2 | MD: 2.61 (1.29, 3.93) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: interproximal contacts | 2 | MD: 0.02 (–0.17, 0.21) | 0.83 | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: root angulation | 2 | MD: 0.87 (0.46, 1.28) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
PAR post-Tx | 2 | MD: –0.03 (–2.02, 1.96) | 0.98 | 0 | - | |
PAR reduction via Tx | 3 | MD: –1.76 (–3.62, 0.10) | 0.06 | 0 | - |
ABO-OGS, objective grading system of the American Board of Orthodontics; CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference; PAR, peer assessment rating; RR, relative risk; Tx, treatment.
Sensitivity analysis by omitting non-randomized studies (without the Li et al., 2015 study).
. | Original analysis . | . | . | Sensitivity analysis . | . | . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outcome . | n . | Effect (95% CI) . | P . | n . | Effect (95% CI) . | P . |
Treatment duration (months) | 7 | MD: –0.55 (–3.73, 2.63) | 0.73 | 2 | MD: 2.69 (–4.97, 10.35) | 0.49 |
ABO-OGS total score | 2 | MD: 13.38 (9.45, 17.31) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS failure (score>30) | 2 | RR: 1.63 (1.24, 2.13) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: alignment | 2 | MD: 2.60 (–0.48, 5.69) | 0.10 | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: marginal ridges | 2 | MD: 0.60 (–0.22, 1.43) | 0.15 | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: buccolingual inclination | 2 | MD: 1.14 (0.21, 2.07) | 0.02† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: occlusal contacts | 2 | MD: 4.45 (2.72, 6.18) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: occlusal relationship | 2 | MD: 1.39 (–0.12, 2.89) | 0.07 | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: overjet | 2 | MD: 2.61 (1.29, 3.93) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: interproximal contacts | 2 | MD: 0.02 (–0.17, 0.21) | 0.83 | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: root angulation | 2 | MD: 0.87 (0.46, 1.28) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
PAR post-Tx | 2 | MD: –0.03 (–2.02, 1.96) | 0.98 | 0 | - | |
PAR reduction via Tx | 3 | MD: –1.76 (–3.62, 0.10) | 0.06 | 0 | - |
. | Original analysis . | . | . | Sensitivity analysis . | . | . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outcome . | n . | Effect (95% CI) . | P . | n . | Effect (95% CI) . | P . |
Treatment duration (months) | 7 | MD: –0.55 (–3.73, 2.63) | 0.73 | 2 | MD: 2.69 (–4.97, 10.35) | 0.49 |
ABO-OGS total score | 2 | MD: 13.38 (9.45, 17.31) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS failure (score>30) | 2 | RR: 1.63 (1.24, 2.13) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: alignment | 2 | MD: 2.60 (–0.48, 5.69) | 0.10 | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: marginal ridges | 2 | MD: 0.60 (–0.22, 1.43) | 0.15 | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: buccolingual inclination | 2 | MD: 1.14 (0.21, 2.07) | 0.02† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: occlusal contacts | 2 | MD: 4.45 (2.72, 6.18) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: occlusal relationship | 2 | MD: 1.39 (–0.12, 2.89) | 0.07 | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: overjet | 2 | MD: 2.61 (1.29, 3.93) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: interproximal contacts | 2 | MD: 0.02 (–0.17, 0.21) | 0.83 | 0 | - | |
ABO-OGS component: root angulation | 2 | MD: 0.87 (0.46, 1.28) | <0.001† | 0 | - | |
PAR post-Tx | 2 | MD: –0.03 (–2.02, 1.96) | 0.98 | 0 | - | |
PAR reduction via Tx | 3 | MD: –1.76 (–3.62, 0.10) | 0.06 | 0 | - |
ABO-OGS, objective grading system of the American Board of Orthodontics; CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference; PAR, peer assessment rating; RR, relative risk; Tx, treatment.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.