Table 1

Main classification systems of anastomotic leakage

SystemLeak classificationGradeSigns and symptoms (or definition)Management
Bruce et al., 2001*Radiological• Detected only on routine imaging; no clinical signs• No change
Clinical minor• Luminal contents through the drain or wound site (local inflammation)
• Fever (>38°C) or leukocytosis (>10,000/L)
• Leak may also be detected on imaging studies
• Prolonged hospital stay and/or delay in resuming oral intake
Clinical major• As clinical minor with severe disruption to anastomosis
• Leak may also be detected on imaging studies
• Intervention required
Lerut et al., 2002Radiological• No clinical signs• No change
Clinical minor• Local inflammation cervical wound
• X-ray contained leak (thoracic anastomosis)
• Fever, > WBC, > CRP
• Drain wound
• Delay oral intake
• Antibiotics
Clinical major• Severe disruption on endoscopy
• Sepsis
• CT-guided drainage or reintervention
Conduit necrosis• Endoscopic confirmation• Reintervention
Price et al., 2013RadiologicalI• No clinical signs or symptoms
• Purely radiological diagnosis
• No change in management
Clinical minorII• Minor clinical signs (e.g. cervical wound inflammation or drainage)
• Radiographically contained intrathoracic leak
• Fever, leukocytosis
• Delay oral intake
• Antibiotics
• Wound drainage
• CT-guided drain placement
Clinical majorIII• Significant anastomotic disruption requiring surgical—revision
• Minor anastomotic disruption with systematic sepsis
• Esophageal stent placement
• Surgical debridement
• Anastomotic revision
Conduit necrosisIV• Conduit necrosis necessitating esophageal diversion• Conduit resection with esophageal diversion
Low et al., 2015§Anastomotic leakageI• Local defect• No change in therapy or medical treatment or dietary modification
II• Local defect• Interventional radiology drain
• Stenting or bedside opening
• Packing of incision
III• Local defect• Surgical therapy
Conduit necrosisI• Focal (identified endoscopically)• Additional monitoring or nonsurgical therapy
II• Focal (identified endoscopically, not associated with free anastomotic or conduit leakage)• Surgical therapy without esophageal diversion
III• Extensive• Surgical therapy: conduit resection with diversion
SystemLeak classificationGradeSigns and symptoms (or definition)Management
Bruce et al., 2001*Radiological• Detected only on routine imaging; no clinical signs• No change
Clinical minor• Luminal contents through the drain or wound site (local inflammation)
• Fever (>38°C) or leukocytosis (>10,000/L)
• Leak may also be detected on imaging studies
• Prolonged hospital stay and/or delay in resuming oral intake
Clinical major• As clinical minor with severe disruption to anastomosis
• Leak may also be detected on imaging studies
• Intervention required
Lerut et al., 2002Radiological• No clinical signs• No change
Clinical minor• Local inflammation cervical wound
• X-ray contained leak (thoracic anastomosis)
• Fever, > WBC, > CRP
• Drain wound
• Delay oral intake
• Antibiotics
Clinical major• Severe disruption on endoscopy
• Sepsis
• CT-guided drainage or reintervention
Conduit necrosis• Endoscopic confirmation• Reintervention
Price et al., 2013RadiologicalI• No clinical signs or symptoms
• Purely radiological diagnosis
• No change in management
Clinical minorII• Minor clinical signs (e.g. cervical wound inflammation or drainage)
• Radiographically contained intrathoracic leak
• Fever, leukocytosis
• Delay oral intake
• Antibiotics
• Wound drainage
• CT-guided drain placement
Clinical majorIII• Significant anastomotic disruption requiring surgical—revision
• Minor anastomotic disruption with systematic sepsis
• Esophageal stent placement
• Surgical debridement
• Anastomotic revision
Conduit necrosisIV• Conduit necrosis necessitating esophageal diversion• Conduit resection with esophageal diversion
Low et al., 2015§Anastomotic leakageI• Local defect• No change in therapy or medical treatment or dietary modification
II• Local defect• Interventional radiology drain
• Stenting or bedside opening
• Packing of incision
III• Local defect• Surgical therapy
Conduit necrosisI• Focal (identified endoscopically)• Additional monitoring or nonsurgical therapy
II• Focal (identified endoscopically, not associated with free anastomotic or conduit leakage)• Surgical therapy without esophageal diversion
III• Extensive• Surgical therapy: conduit resection with diversion

*Bruce, J., Krukowski, Z. H., Al-Khairy, G., Russell, E. M. & Park, K. G. M. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. British Journal of Surgery (2001) doi:10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01829.x.

Lerut, T. et al. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. in Digestive Surgery (2002). doi:10.1159/000052018.

T.N., P. et al. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Ann. Thorac. Surg. (2013).

§Low, D. E. et al. International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). Ann. Surg. (2015) doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001098.

Table 1

Main classification systems of anastomotic leakage

SystemLeak classificationGradeSigns and symptoms (or definition)Management
Bruce et al., 2001*Radiological• Detected only on routine imaging; no clinical signs• No change
Clinical minor• Luminal contents through the drain or wound site (local inflammation)
• Fever (>38°C) or leukocytosis (>10,000/L)
• Leak may also be detected on imaging studies
• Prolonged hospital stay and/or delay in resuming oral intake
Clinical major• As clinical minor with severe disruption to anastomosis
• Leak may also be detected on imaging studies
• Intervention required
Lerut et al., 2002Radiological• No clinical signs• No change
Clinical minor• Local inflammation cervical wound
• X-ray contained leak (thoracic anastomosis)
• Fever, > WBC, > CRP
• Drain wound
• Delay oral intake
• Antibiotics
Clinical major• Severe disruption on endoscopy
• Sepsis
• CT-guided drainage or reintervention
Conduit necrosis• Endoscopic confirmation• Reintervention
Price et al., 2013RadiologicalI• No clinical signs or symptoms
• Purely radiological diagnosis
• No change in management
Clinical minorII• Minor clinical signs (e.g. cervical wound inflammation or drainage)
• Radiographically contained intrathoracic leak
• Fever, leukocytosis
• Delay oral intake
• Antibiotics
• Wound drainage
• CT-guided drain placement
Clinical majorIII• Significant anastomotic disruption requiring surgical—revision
• Minor anastomotic disruption with systematic sepsis
• Esophageal stent placement
• Surgical debridement
• Anastomotic revision
Conduit necrosisIV• Conduit necrosis necessitating esophageal diversion• Conduit resection with esophageal diversion
Low et al., 2015§Anastomotic leakageI• Local defect• No change in therapy or medical treatment or dietary modification
II• Local defect• Interventional radiology drain
• Stenting or bedside opening
• Packing of incision
III• Local defect• Surgical therapy
Conduit necrosisI• Focal (identified endoscopically)• Additional monitoring or nonsurgical therapy
II• Focal (identified endoscopically, not associated with free anastomotic or conduit leakage)• Surgical therapy without esophageal diversion
III• Extensive• Surgical therapy: conduit resection with diversion
SystemLeak classificationGradeSigns and symptoms (or definition)Management
Bruce et al., 2001*Radiological• Detected only on routine imaging; no clinical signs• No change
Clinical minor• Luminal contents through the drain or wound site (local inflammation)
• Fever (>38°C) or leukocytosis (>10,000/L)
• Leak may also be detected on imaging studies
• Prolonged hospital stay and/or delay in resuming oral intake
Clinical major• As clinical minor with severe disruption to anastomosis
• Leak may also be detected on imaging studies
• Intervention required
Lerut et al., 2002Radiological• No clinical signs• No change
Clinical minor• Local inflammation cervical wound
• X-ray contained leak (thoracic anastomosis)
• Fever, > WBC, > CRP
• Drain wound
• Delay oral intake
• Antibiotics
Clinical major• Severe disruption on endoscopy
• Sepsis
• CT-guided drainage or reintervention
Conduit necrosis• Endoscopic confirmation• Reintervention
Price et al., 2013RadiologicalI• No clinical signs or symptoms
• Purely radiological diagnosis
• No change in management
Clinical minorII• Minor clinical signs (e.g. cervical wound inflammation or drainage)
• Radiographically contained intrathoracic leak
• Fever, leukocytosis
• Delay oral intake
• Antibiotics
• Wound drainage
• CT-guided drain placement
Clinical majorIII• Significant anastomotic disruption requiring surgical—revision
• Minor anastomotic disruption with systematic sepsis
• Esophageal stent placement
• Surgical debridement
• Anastomotic revision
Conduit necrosisIV• Conduit necrosis necessitating esophageal diversion• Conduit resection with esophageal diversion
Low et al., 2015§Anastomotic leakageI• Local defect• No change in therapy or medical treatment or dietary modification
II• Local defect• Interventional radiology drain
• Stenting or bedside opening
• Packing of incision
III• Local defect• Surgical therapy
Conduit necrosisI• Focal (identified endoscopically)• Additional monitoring or nonsurgical therapy
II• Focal (identified endoscopically, not associated with free anastomotic or conduit leakage)• Surgical therapy without esophageal diversion
III• Extensive• Surgical therapy: conduit resection with diversion

*Bruce, J., Krukowski, Z. H., Al-Khairy, G., Russell, E. M. & Park, K. G. M. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. British Journal of Surgery (2001) doi:10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01829.x.

Lerut, T. et al. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. in Digestive Surgery (2002). doi:10.1159/000052018.

T.N., P. et al. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Ann. Thorac. Surg. (2013).

§Low, D. E. et al. International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). Ann. Surg. (2015) doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001098.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close