Table 2

Evaluation of emotional concepts

SubscoresControlsPatients with svPPAP-value (η2)
Taxonomic knowledge
 Synonyms65.0% (30.8)46.2% (39.3)0.13 (0.071)
 Matching98.8% (5.6)84.6% (24.0)0.01 (0.173)
Contextual knowledge
 Examples97.5% (7.7)80.8% (34.1)0.04 (0.128)
 Context choice92.5% (6.3)87.5% (10.5)0.09 (0.087)
Total88.4% (9.0)74.6% (22.1)0.01 (0.166)
SubscoresControlsPatients with svPPAP-value (η2)
Taxonomic knowledge
 Synonyms65.0% (30.8)46.2% (39.3)0.13 (0.071)
 Matching98.8% (5.6)84.6% (24.0)0.01 (0.173)
Contextual knowledge
 Examples97.5% (7.7)80.8% (34.1)0.04 (0.128)
 Context choice92.5% (6.3)87.5% (10.5)0.09 (0.087)
Total88.4% (9.0)74.6% (22.1)0.01 (0.166)

Percentage performances (standard deviation) on the EEC subtests and differences (P-values and η2 as effect size) between groups.

Table 2

Evaluation of emotional concepts

SubscoresControlsPatients with svPPAP-value (η2)
Taxonomic knowledge
 Synonyms65.0% (30.8)46.2% (39.3)0.13 (0.071)
 Matching98.8% (5.6)84.6% (24.0)0.01 (0.173)
Contextual knowledge
 Examples97.5% (7.7)80.8% (34.1)0.04 (0.128)
 Context choice92.5% (6.3)87.5% (10.5)0.09 (0.087)
Total88.4% (9.0)74.6% (22.1)0.01 (0.166)
SubscoresControlsPatients with svPPAP-value (η2)
Taxonomic knowledge
 Synonyms65.0% (30.8)46.2% (39.3)0.13 (0.071)
 Matching98.8% (5.6)84.6% (24.0)0.01 (0.173)
Contextual knowledge
 Examples97.5% (7.7)80.8% (34.1)0.04 (0.128)
 Context choice92.5% (6.3)87.5% (10.5)0.09 (0.087)
Total88.4% (9.0)74.6% (22.1)0.01 (0.166)

Percentage performances (standard deviation) on the EEC subtests and differences (P-values and η2 as effect size) between groups.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close