Regression of Municipal School Introduction on Lagged Municipal Birth Trends
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Outcome: New secondary school indicator . | ||||
A | ||||
Births per 100, 15–19 years | 0.0012 | 0.0002 | ‒0.0004 | 0.0029 |
(t-1) | (0.0130) | (0.0130) | (0.0396) | (0.0490) |
Observations | 43,955 | 43,649 | 22,578 | 17,963 |
Municipalities | 4,884 | 4,850 | 2,509 | 1,996 |
B | ||||
Births per 100 at ages 15–19, 5-year growth rate | 0.0008 | 0.0008 | ‒0.0010 | ‒0.0018 |
(0.0012) | (0.0012) | (0.0018) | (0.0025) | |
Observations | 43,952 | 43,646 | 22,578 | 17,963 |
Municipalities | 4,884 | 4,850 | 2,509 | 1,996 |
Municipalities in sample | All | Pop < 500 k | Pop 10 k–100 k | Pop 10 k–100 k + new |
school 1997–2005 |
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Outcome: New secondary school indicator . | ||||
A | ||||
Births per 100, 15–19 years | 0.0012 | 0.0002 | ‒0.0004 | 0.0029 |
(t-1) | (0.0130) | (0.0130) | (0.0396) | (0.0490) |
Observations | 43,955 | 43,649 | 22,578 | 17,963 |
Municipalities | 4,884 | 4,850 | 2,509 | 1,996 |
B | ||||
Births per 100 at ages 15–19, 5-year growth rate | 0.0008 | 0.0008 | ‒0.0010 | ‒0.0018 |
(0.0012) | (0.0012) | (0.0018) | (0.0025) | |
Observations | 43,952 | 43,646 | 22,578 | 17,963 |
Municipalities | 4,884 | 4,850 | 2,509 | 1,996 |
Municipalities in sample | All | Pop < 500 k | Pop 10 k–100 k | Pop 10 k–100 k + new |
school 1997–2005 |
Source: Authors’ analysis based on school data from the 2002 wave of the Brazilian School Census; official population estimates from the Brazilian Census Bureau; births by age from Brazilian Vital Statistics.
Note: This table reports the results of regressing a binary variable, indicating a new school introduced to a municipality in year t, on the number of births in period |$t - 1$| (panel A), and the growth rate in teen births over the previous 4 years (panel B). Coefficients are multiplied by 100 for display purposes. Growth in teen births calculated as the average annual percent change in cohort births between t and t-4. Estimates condition on lagged primary school enrolment, nursery and preschool classrooms, municipality expenditures, municipality and year fixed effects. Municipality-clustered standard errors are reported in parenthesis.
Regression of Municipal School Introduction on Lagged Municipal Birth Trends
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Outcome: New secondary school indicator . | ||||
A | ||||
Births per 100, 15–19 years | 0.0012 | 0.0002 | ‒0.0004 | 0.0029 |
(t-1) | (0.0130) | (0.0130) | (0.0396) | (0.0490) |
Observations | 43,955 | 43,649 | 22,578 | 17,963 |
Municipalities | 4,884 | 4,850 | 2,509 | 1,996 |
B | ||||
Births per 100 at ages 15–19, 5-year growth rate | 0.0008 | 0.0008 | ‒0.0010 | ‒0.0018 |
(0.0012) | (0.0012) | (0.0018) | (0.0025) | |
Observations | 43,952 | 43,646 | 22,578 | 17,963 |
Municipalities | 4,884 | 4,850 | 2,509 | 1,996 |
Municipalities in sample | All | Pop < 500 k | Pop 10 k–100 k | Pop 10 k–100 k + new |
school 1997–2005 |
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Outcome: New secondary school indicator . | ||||
A | ||||
Births per 100, 15–19 years | 0.0012 | 0.0002 | ‒0.0004 | 0.0029 |
(t-1) | (0.0130) | (0.0130) | (0.0396) | (0.0490) |
Observations | 43,955 | 43,649 | 22,578 | 17,963 |
Municipalities | 4,884 | 4,850 | 2,509 | 1,996 |
B | ||||
Births per 100 at ages 15–19, 5-year growth rate | 0.0008 | 0.0008 | ‒0.0010 | ‒0.0018 |
(0.0012) | (0.0012) | (0.0018) | (0.0025) | |
Observations | 43,952 | 43,646 | 22,578 | 17,963 |
Municipalities | 4,884 | 4,850 | 2,509 | 1,996 |
Municipalities in sample | All | Pop < 500 k | Pop 10 k–100 k | Pop 10 k–100 k + new |
school 1997–2005 |
Source: Authors’ analysis based on school data from the 2002 wave of the Brazilian School Census; official population estimates from the Brazilian Census Bureau; births by age from Brazilian Vital Statistics.
Note: This table reports the results of regressing a binary variable, indicating a new school introduced to a municipality in year t, on the number of births in period |$t - 1$| (panel A), and the growth rate in teen births over the previous 4 years (panel B). Coefficients are multiplied by 100 for display purposes. Growth in teen births calculated as the average annual percent change in cohort births between t and t-4. Estimates condition on lagged primary school enrolment, nursery and preschool classrooms, municipality expenditures, municipality and year fixed effects. Municipality-clustered standard errors are reported in parenthesis.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.