Table 6.

The definitions, units, and prior ranges of the parameters of the fitting models.

ParameterDefinitionUnitPosterior
56Ni model
MejEjecta massM[0.1, 50]
v9Ejecta velocity109 cm s−1[0.1, 5.0(10.0)]a
MNi56Ni massM[0.001, 2.0(20.0)]a
κγ, NiGamma-ray opacity of 56Ni-cascade-decay photonscm2 g−1[0.027, 104]c
TfTemperature floor of the photosphere103 K[1000, 10, 000]
|$t_{\rm shift}^{\rm b}$|Explosion time relative to the first datadays[ − 20, 0]
Cooling model with three additional parameters compared to the 56Ni model.
MeEnvelope massM[0.01, 30]
Re, 12Envelope radius1012 cm[10, 3000]
Ee, 50Energy passed into the envelope from SN core1050 erg s−1[10−5, 103]c
Magnetar model with three different parameters compared to the 56Ni model, but dropped MNi and κγ, Ni.
P0Initial period of the magnetarms[0.8, 50]
Bp, 14Magnetic field strength of the magnetar1014 G[0.1, 100]
κγ, magGamma-ray opacity of magnetar photonscm2  g−1[0.01, 104]c
ParameterDefinitionUnitPosterior
56Ni model
MejEjecta massM[0.1, 50]
v9Ejecta velocity109 cm s−1[0.1, 5.0(10.0)]a
MNi56Ni massM[0.001, 2.0(20.0)]a
κγ, NiGamma-ray opacity of 56Ni-cascade-decay photonscm2 g−1[0.027, 104]c
TfTemperature floor of the photosphere103 K[1000, 10, 000]
|$t_{\rm shift}^{\rm b}$|Explosion time relative to the first datadays[ − 20, 0]
Cooling model with three additional parameters compared to the 56Ni model.
MeEnvelope massM[0.01, 30]
Re, 12Envelope radius1012 cm[10, 3000]
Ee, 50Energy passed into the envelope from SN core1050 erg s−1[10−5, 103]c
Magnetar model with three different parameters compared to the 56Ni model, but dropped MNi and κγ, Ni.
P0Initial period of the magnetarms[0.8, 50]
Bp, 14Magnetic field strength of the magnetar1014 G[0.1, 100]
κγ, magGamma-ray opacity of magnetar photonscm2  g−1[0.01, 104]c

aFor four luminous or superluminous SNe (SNe 2008fz, 2010hy, 2012aa, and 2018cow; see Table S3 in the supplementary material), the upper limits of prior of v9 and MNi are set to be 10 and 20.0, respectively.

bFor the SNe whose explosion date (t0) had been inferred (see Table 5), the tshift parameter was set to be fixed.

cParameter was distributed in log space.

Table 6.

The definitions, units, and prior ranges of the parameters of the fitting models.

ParameterDefinitionUnitPosterior
56Ni model
MejEjecta massM[0.1, 50]
v9Ejecta velocity109 cm s−1[0.1, 5.0(10.0)]a
MNi56Ni massM[0.001, 2.0(20.0)]a
κγ, NiGamma-ray opacity of 56Ni-cascade-decay photonscm2 g−1[0.027, 104]c
TfTemperature floor of the photosphere103 K[1000, 10, 000]
|$t_{\rm shift}^{\rm b}$|Explosion time relative to the first datadays[ − 20, 0]
Cooling model with three additional parameters compared to the 56Ni model.
MeEnvelope massM[0.01, 30]
Re, 12Envelope radius1012 cm[10, 3000]
Ee, 50Energy passed into the envelope from SN core1050 erg s−1[10−5, 103]c
Magnetar model with three different parameters compared to the 56Ni model, but dropped MNi and κγ, Ni.
P0Initial period of the magnetarms[0.8, 50]
Bp, 14Magnetic field strength of the magnetar1014 G[0.1, 100]
κγ, magGamma-ray opacity of magnetar photonscm2  g−1[0.01, 104]c
ParameterDefinitionUnitPosterior
56Ni model
MejEjecta massM[0.1, 50]
v9Ejecta velocity109 cm s−1[0.1, 5.0(10.0)]a
MNi56Ni massM[0.001, 2.0(20.0)]a
κγ, NiGamma-ray opacity of 56Ni-cascade-decay photonscm2 g−1[0.027, 104]c
TfTemperature floor of the photosphere103 K[1000, 10, 000]
|$t_{\rm shift}^{\rm b}$|Explosion time relative to the first datadays[ − 20, 0]
Cooling model with three additional parameters compared to the 56Ni model.
MeEnvelope massM[0.01, 30]
Re, 12Envelope radius1012 cm[10, 3000]
Ee, 50Energy passed into the envelope from SN core1050 erg s−1[10−5, 103]c
Magnetar model with three different parameters compared to the 56Ni model, but dropped MNi and κγ, Ni.
P0Initial period of the magnetarms[0.8, 50]
Bp, 14Magnetic field strength of the magnetar1014 G[0.1, 100]
κγ, magGamma-ray opacity of magnetar photonscm2  g−1[0.01, 104]c

aFor four luminous or superluminous SNe (SNe 2008fz, 2010hy, 2012aa, and 2018cow; see Table S3 in the supplementary material), the upper limits of prior of v9 and MNi are set to be 10 and 20.0, respectively.

bFor the SNe whose explosion date (t0) had been inferred (see Table 5), the tshift parameter was set to be fixed.

cParameter was distributed in log space.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close