Table 29.15
Randomized controlled trials of radiofrequency ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs or no treatment for atrial fibrillation
Study [reference] No. of patients Type of AF Previous use of AAD Ablation technique Patients without AF, %—Ablation vs. AAD or no AAD

Krittayaphong et al. 2003 [483]

30

Paroxysmal or persistent

≥1 AAD failured

PVI + LA lines + CTI ablation

 

+ RA lines

79 vs. 40

Wazni et al. 2005

 

(RAAFT) [484]

70

Mainly paroxysmal

No

PVI

87 vs. 37

Stabile et al. 2006 (CACAF) [485]

137

Paroxysmal or persistent

≥2 AAD failure

PVI + LA lines ± CTI ablation

56 vs. 9

Oral et al. 2006 [486]

146

Persistent

≥1 AAD failure (mean 2.1 ± 1.2)

CPVA

74 vs. 4

Pappone et al. 2006 (APAF) [487]

198

Paroxysmal

≥2 AAD failure (mean 2 ± 1)

CPVA + CTI ablation

86 vs. 22

Jais et al. 2008

 

(A4 study) [488]

112

Paroxysmal

≥1 AAD failure

PVI ± LA lines ± CTI ablation

89 vs. 23

Forleo et al. 2009 [489]

70

Paroxysmal or persistent

≥1 AAD failure

PVI + CTI ablation ± LA lines

80 vs. 43

Thermocool 2008f

159

Paroxysmal

≥1 AAD failureg

PVI + CTI ablation ± LA lines ± RA focal ablation

66 vs. 17

Study [reference] No. of patients Type of AF Previous use of AAD Ablation technique Patients without AF, %—Ablation vs. AAD or no AAD

Krittayaphong et al. 2003 [483]

30

Paroxysmal or persistent

≥1 AAD failured

PVI + LA lines + CTI ablation

 

+ RA lines

79 vs. 40

Wazni et al. 2005

 

(RAAFT) [484]

70

Mainly paroxysmal

No

PVI

87 vs. 37

Stabile et al. 2006 (CACAF) [485]

137

Paroxysmal or persistent

≥2 AAD failure

PVI + LA lines ± CTI ablation

56 vs. 9

Oral et al. 2006 [486]

146

Persistent

≥1 AAD failure (mean 2.1 ± 1.2)

CPVA

74 vs. 4

Pappone et al. 2006 (APAF) [487]

198

Paroxysmal

≥2 AAD failure (mean 2 ± 1)

CPVA + CTI ablation

86 vs. 22

Jais et al. 2008

 

(A4 study) [488]

112

Paroxysmal

≥1 AAD failure

PVI ± LA lines ± CTI ablation

89 vs. 23

Forleo et al. 2009 [489]

70

Paroxysmal or persistent

≥1 AAD failure

PVI + CTI ablation ± LA lines

80 vs. 43

Thermocool 2008f

159

Paroxysmal

≥1 AAD failureg

PVI + CTI ablation ± LA lines ± RA focal ablation

66 vs. 17

a

All patients in the ablation arm were treated with antiarrhythmic drugs; bpatients in the control group received amiodarone and had up to two electrical cardioversions if required during the first 3 months; amiodarone was discontinued if patients were in sinus rhythm after 3 months; cwith type 2 diabetes mellitus; dno previous use of amiodarone, but ‘failed’ drugs included beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, and digitalis in addition to class IA and IC agents; eafter 1 year; not allowed during 1 year-follow-up; fpresented at the Heart Rhythm Society meeting in May 2009; gincluding beta-blockers and calcium antagonists. All studies had a follow-up period of 1 year.

AAD, antiarrhythmic drugs; AF, atrial fibrillation; APAF, Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation study; A4, Atrial fibrillation Ablation versus AntiArrhythmic drugs; CACAF, Catheter Ablation for the Cure of Atrial Fibrillation study; CPVA, circumferential pulmonary vein ablation; CTI, cavotricuspid isthmus; LA, left atrial; PVI, pulmonary vein isolation; RAAFT, Radiofrequency Ablation Atrial Fibrillation Trial; RA, right atrial.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close