Table A.4.

Nigeria: Mean IPV Prevalence across Methods by Respondent Characteristics

Emotional IPVPhysical IPVSexual IPV
Below medianAbove medianBelow medianAbove medianBelow medianAbove median
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)
ListF2FListF2FListF2FListF2FListF2FListF2F
Variable
 Vulnerability index0.430.330.360.260.270.200.260.190.270.300.250.26
(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.01)(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)
 Unequal-village-gender-norms index0.400.240.390.360.240.150.290.230.240.270.280.30
(0.04)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)
 Relationship-quality index0.440.390.360.220.290.270.240.130.280.390.250.19
(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)
 Progressive-gender-attitudes index0.410.350.380.250.300.240.230.140.280.350.240.21
(0.04)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)
 Wife’s age0.360.270.430.320.210.180.310.210.230.280.290.27
(0.04)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)
Indicator variablesWife illiterateWife literateWife illiterateWife literateWife illiterateWife literate
 Wife reads and writes0.380.310.480.240.270.210.240.090.250.290.330.25
(0.03)(0.01)(0.08)(0.00)(0.04)(0.01)(0.09)(0.00)(0.04)(0.01)(0.08)(0.00)
Least confidentMost confidentLeast confidentMost confidentLeast confidentMost confident
 Confidence in speaking up in village0.410.340.380.210.250.210.290.150.270.290.250.27
(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.06)(0.02)(0.04)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)
PolygamousMonogamousPolygamousMonogamousPolygamousMonogamous
 Marriage type0.360.320.430.280.170.210.330.180.190.310.310.26
(0.05)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)(0.06)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)
No assets to marriageBrought assetsNo assets to marriageBrought assetsNo assets to marriageBrought assets
 Wife brought assets to marriage0.420.400.380.220.250.270.270.140.280.330.250.24
(0.00)(0.02)(0.04)(0.01)(0.00)(0.02)(0.04)(0.01)(0.00)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)
Emotional IPVPhysical IPVSexual IPV
Below medianAbove medianBelow medianAbove medianBelow medianAbove median
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)
ListF2FListF2FListF2FListF2FListF2FListF2F
Variable
 Vulnerability index0.430.330.360.260.270.200.260.190.270.300.250.26
(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.01)(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)
 Unequal-village-gender-norms index0.400.240.390.360.240.150.290.230.240.270.280.30
(0.04)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)
 Relationship-quality index0.440.390.360.220.290.270.240.130.280.390.250.19
(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)
 Progressive-gender-attitudes index0.410.350.380.250.300.240.230.140.280.350.240.21
(0.04)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)
 Wife’s age0.360.270.430.320.210.180.310.210.230.280.290.27
(0.04)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)
Indicator variablesWife illiterateWife literateWife illiterateWife literateWife illiterateWife literate
 Wife reads and writes0.380.310.480.240.270.210.240.090.250.290.330.25
(0.03)(0.01)(0.08)(0.00)(0.04)(0.01)(0.09)(0.00)(0.04)(0.01)(0.08)(0.00)
Least confidentMost confidentLeast confidentMost confidentLeast confidentMost confident
 Confidence in speaking up in village0.410.340.380.210.250.210.290.150.270.290.250.27
(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.06)(0.02)(0.04)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)
PolygamousMonogamousPolygamousMonogamousPolygamousMonogamous
 Marriage type0.360.320.430.280.170.210.330.180.190.310.310.26
(0.05)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)(0.06)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)
No assets to marriageBrought assetsNo assets to marriageBrought assetsNo assets to marriageBrought assets
 Wife brought assets to marriage0.420.400.380.220.250.270.270.140.280.330.250.24
(0.00)(0.02)(0.04)(0.01)(0.00)(0.02)(0.04)(0.01)(0.00)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)

Source: Author’s analysis based on own data.

Note: This table shows the difference in IPV prevalence by a number of respondent characteristics, for each of the three IPV questions. The left column lists the variables correlated with IPV. Columns 1–12 show the mean IPV prevalence by respondent characteristics (above or below median for continuous variables, or by binary characteristics). Coefficients in columns 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 were estimated using a regression on the number of list items reported. Standard errors are shown in parentheses. IPV, Intimate partner violence; F2F, face to face.

Table A.4.

Nigeria: Mean IPV Prevalence across Methods by Respondent Characteristics

Emotional IPVPhysical IPVSexual IPV
Below medianAbove medianBelow medianAbove medianBelow medianAbove median
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)
ListF2FListF2FListF2FListF2FListF2FListF2F
Variable
 Vulnerability index0.430.330.360.260.270.200.260.190.270.300.250.26
(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.01)(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)
 Unequal-village-gender-norms index0.400.240.390.360.240.150.290.230.240.270.280.30
(0.04)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)
 Relationship-quality index0.440.390.360.220.290.270.240.130.280.390.250.19
(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)
 Progressive-gender-attitudes index0.410.350.380.250.300.240.230.140.280.350.240.21
(0.04)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)
 Wife’s age0.360.270.430.320.210.180.310.210.230.280.290.27
(0.04)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)
Indicator variablesWife illiterateWife literateWife illiterateWife literateWife illiterateWife literate
 Wife reads and writes0.380.310.480.240.270.210.240.090.250.290.330.25
(0.03)(0.01)(0.08)(0.00)(0.04)(0.01)(0.09)(0.00)(0.04)(0.01)(0.08)(0.00)
Least confidentMost confidentLeast confidentMost confidentLeast confidentMost confident
 Confidence in speaking up in village0.410.340.380.210.250.210.290.150.270.290.250.27
(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.06)(0.02)(0.04)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)
PolygamousMonogamousPolygamousMonogamousPolygamousMonogamous
 Marriage type0.360.320.430.280.170.210.330.180.190.310.310.26
(0.05)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)(0.06)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)
No assets to marriageBrought assetsNo assets to marriageBrought assetsNo assets to marriageBrought assets
 Wife brought assets to marriage0.420.400.380.220.250.270.270.140.280.330.250.24
(0.00)(0.02)(0.04)(0.01)(0.00)(0.02)(0.04)(0.01)(0.00)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)
Emotional IPVPhysical IPVSexual IPV
Below medianAbove medianBelow medianAbove medianBelow medianAbove median
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)
ListF2FListF2FListF2FListF2FListF2FListF2F
Variable
 Vulnerability index0.430.330.360.260.270.200.260.190.270.300.250.26
(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.01)(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)
 Unequal-village-gender-norms index0.400.240.390.360.240.150.290.230.240.270.280.30
(0.04)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)
 Relationship-quality index0.440.390.360.220.290.270.240.130.280.390.250.19
(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)
 Progressive-gender-attitudes index0.410.350.380.250.300.240.230.140.280.350.240.21
(0.04)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)
 Wife’s age0.360.270.430.320.210.180.310.210.230.280.290.27
(0.04)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)
Indicator variablesWife illiterateWife literateWife illiterateWife literateWife illiterateWife literate
 Wife reads and writes0.380.310.480.240.270.210.240.090.250.290.330.25
(0.03)(0.01)(0.08)(0.00)(0.04)(0.01)(0.09)(0.00)(0.04)(0.01)(0.08)(0.00)
Least confidentMost confidentLeast confidentMost confidentLeast confidentMost confident
 Confidence in speaking up in village0.410.340.380.210.250.210.290.150.270.290.250.27
(0.04)(0.02)(0.05)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.06)(0.02)(0.04)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)
PolygamousMonogamousPolygamousMonogamousPolygamousMonogamous
 Marriage type0.360.320.430.280.170.210.330.180.190.310.310.26
(0.05)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)(0.06)(0.02)(0.05)(0.01)(0.05)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)
No assets to marriageBrought assetsNo assets to marriageBrought assetsNo assets to marriageBrought assets
 Wife brought assets to marriage0.420.400.380.220.250.270.270.140.280.330.250.24
(0.00)(0.02)(0.04)(0.01)(0.00)(0.02)(0.04)(0.01)(0.00)(0.02)(0.04)(0.02)

Source: Author’s analysis based on own data.

Note: This table shows the difference in IPV prevalence by a number of respondent characteristics, for each of the three IPV questions. The left column lists the variables correlated with IPV. Columns 1–12 show the mean IPV prevalence by respondent characteristics (above or below median for continuous variables, or by binary characteristics). Coefficients in columns 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 were estimated using a regression on the number of list items reported. Standard errors are shown in parentheses. IPV, Intimate partner violence; F2F, face to face.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close