Table A.5. Open in new tab Nigeria:...

	Nigeria (Percentage of respondents)
0	13.81	8.9	12.54	8.61	11.47	11.25
1	59.99	40.64	47.95	38.01	50.14	38.72
2	19.62	37.15	24.86	35.59	32.93	33.67
3	6.59	9.54	14.66	12.38	5.45	13.17
4		3.77		5.41		3.2
No-design-effect p-value:	1		1		1

	Nigeria (Percentage of respondents)
0	13.81	8.9	12.54	8.61	11.47	11.25
1	59.99	40.64	47.95	38.01	50.14	38.72
2	19.62	37.15	24.86	35.59	32.93	33.67
3	6.59	9.54	14.66	12.38	5.45	13.17
4		3.77		5.41		3.2
No-design-effect p-value:	1		1		1

Table A.5.

Nigeria: No-Design-Effects Test and Proportions Responding with Each Option in List Experiment

	Nigeria (Percentage of respondents)
	Q1		Q2		Q3
Response	Non-sensitive	Sensitive	Non-sensitive	Sensitive	Non-sensitive	Sensitive
0	13.81	8.9	12.54	8.61	11.47	11.25
1	59.99	40.64	47.95	38.01	50.14	38.72
2	19.62	37.15	24.86	35.59	32.93	33.67
3	6.59	9.54	14.66	12.38	5.45	13.17
4		3.77		5.41		3.2
No-design-effect p-value:		1		1		1

	Nigeria (Percentage of respondents)
	Q1		Q2		Q3
Response	Non-sensitive	Sensitive	Non-sensitive	Sensitive	Non-sensitive	Sensitive
0	13.81	8.9	12.54	8.61	11.47	11.25
1	59.99	40.64	47.95	38.01	50.14	38.72
2	19.62	37.15	24.86	35.59	32.93	33.67
3	6.59	9.54	14.66	12.38	5.45	13.17
4		3.77		5.41		3.2
No-design-effect p-value:		1		1		1

Source: Author's analysis from author's data.

Note: The table shows Bonferroni-corrected minimum p-values from the no-design-effects test for the list experiment. Null hypothesis is of no design effect. Computed using the List package in R (Blair and Imai 2011).

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only