Influence of BIA-ALCL on Placement and Choice of Texture in Breast Augmentation According to Non-Dutch Plastic Surgeons
| Total . | 28 (100.0) . |
|---|---|
| Preferred implant placement prior to BIA-ALCL | |
| Dual-plane | 13 (46.4) |
| Subglandular | 6 (21.4) |
| Subfascial | 7 (25.0) |
| Submuscular | 2 (7.1) |
| Preferred implant placement currently | |
| Dual-plane | 11 (39.3) |
| Subglandular | 8 (28.6) |
| Subfascial | 9 (32.1) |
| Submuscular | 0 (−) |
| Did BIA-ALCL influence implant placement in breast augmentation? | |
| Yes | 2 (7.1) |
| No | 26 (92.9) |
| What technique has superior aesthetic outcomes? | |
| Dual-plane | 11 (39.3) |
| Subglandular | 7 (25.0) |
| Subfascial | 9 (32.1) |
| Submuscular | 1 (3.6) |
| Preferred implant texture prior to BIA-ALCL | |
| Macrotextured | 8 (28.6) |
| Microtextured | 14 (50.0) |
| Smooth/nanotextured | 2 (7.1) |
| Coated (eg, polyurethane) | 4 (14.3) |
| Preferred implant texture currently | |
| Macrotextured | 0 (−) |
| Microtextured | 13 (46.4) |
| Smooth/nanotextured | 11 (39.3) |
| Coated (eg, polyurethane) | 4 (14.3) |
| Did BIA-ALCL influence implant texture in breast augmentation? | |
| Yes | 17 (60.7) |
| No | 11 (39.3) |
| Total . | 28 (100.0) . |
|---|---|
| Preferred implant placement prior to BIA-ALCL | |
| Dual-plane | 13 (46.4) |
| Subglandular | 6 (21.4) |
| Subfascial | 7 (25.0) |
| Submuscular | 2 (7.1) |
| Preferred implant placement currently | |
| Dual-plane | 11 (39.3) |
| Subglandular | 8 (28.6) |
| Subfascial | 9 (32.1) |
| Submuscular | 0 (−) |
| Did BIA-ALCL influence implant placement in breast augmentation? | |
| Yes | 2 (7.1) |
| No | 26 (92.9) |
| What technique has superior aesthetic outcomes? | |
| Dual-plane | 11 (39.3) |
| Subglandular | 7 (25.0) |
| Subfascial | 9 (32.1) |
| Submuscular | 1 (3.6) |
| Preferred implant texture prior to BIA-ALCL | |
| Macrotextured | 8 (28.6) |
| Microtextured | 14 (50.0) |
| Smooth/nanotextured | 2 (7.1) |
| Coated (eg, polyurethane) | 4 (14.3) |
| Preferred implant texture currently | |
| Macrotextured | 0 (−) |
| Microtextured | 13 (46.4) |
| Smooth/nanotextured | 11 (39.3) |
| Coated (eg, polyurethane) | 4 (14.3) |
| Did BIA-ALCL influence implant texture in breast augmentation? | |
| Yes | 17 (60.7) |
| No | 11 (39.3) |
Values are n (%). BIA-ALCL, breast implant–associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma.
Influence of BIA-ALCL on Placement and Choice of Texture in Breast Augmentation According to Non-Dutch Plastic Surgeons
| Total . | 28 (100.0) . |
|---|---|
| Preferred implant placement prior to BIA-ALCL | |
| Dual-plane | 13 (46.4) |
| Subglandular | 6 (21.4) |
| Subfascial | 7 (25.0) |
| Submuscular | 2 (7.1) |
| Preferred implant placement currently | |
| Dual-plane | 11 (39.3) |
| Subglandular | 8 (28.6) |
| Subfascial | 9 (32.1) |
| Submuscular | 0 (−) |
| Did BIA-ALCL influence implant placement in breast augmentation? | |
| Yes | 2 (7.1) |
| No | 26 (92.9) |
| What technique has superior aesthetic outcomes? | |
| Dual-plane | 11 (39.3) |
| Subglandular | 7 (25.0) |
| Subfascial | 9 (32.1) |
| Submuscular | 1 (3.6) |
| Preferred implant texture prior to BIA-ALCL | |
| Macrotextured | 8 (28.6) |
| Microtextured | 14 (50.0) |
| Smooth/nanotextured | 2 (7.1) |
| Coated (eg, polyurethane) | 4 (14.3) |
| Preferred implant texture currently | |
| Macrotextured | 0 (−) |
| Microtextured | 13 (46.4) |
| Smooth/nanotextured | 11 (39.3) |
| Coated (eg, polyurethane) | 4 (14.3) |
| Did BIA-ALCL influence implant texture in breast augmentation? | |
| Yes | 17 (60.7) |
| No | 11 (39.3) |
| Total . | 28 (100.0) . |
|---|---|
| Preferred implant placement prior to BIA-ALCL | |
| Dual-plane | 13 (46.4) |
| Subglandular | 6 (21.4) |
| Subfascial | 7 (25.0) |
| Submuscular | 2 (7.1) |
| Preferred implant placement currently | |
| Dual-plane | 11 (39.3) |
| Subglandular | 8 (28.6) |
| Subfascial | 9 (32.1) |
| Submuscular | 0 (−) |
| Did BIA-ALCL influence implant placement in breast augmentation? | |
| Yes | 2 (7.1) |
| No | 26 (92.9) |
| What technique has superior aesthetic outcomes? | |
| Dual-plane | 11 (39.3) |
| Subglandular | 7 (25.0) |
| Subfascial | 9 (32.1) |
| Submuscular | 1 (3.6) |
| Preferred implant texture prior to BIA-ALCL | |
| Macrotextured | 8 (28.6) |
| Microtextured | 14 (50.0) |
| Smooth/nanotextured | 2 (7.1) |
| Coated (eg, polyurethane) | 4 (14.3) |
| Preferred implant texture currently | |
| Macrotextured | 0 (−) |
| Microtextured | 13 (46.4) |
| Smooth/nanotextured | 11 (39.3) |
| Coated (eg, polyurethane) | 4 (14.3) |
| Did BIA-ALCL influence implant texture in breast augmentation? | |
| Yes | 17 (60.7) |
| No | 11 (39.3) |
Values are n (%). BIA-ALCL, breast implant–associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
