. | Dependent variable: . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | Brahmin . | Chhetri . | Age . | Educ. . | Father educ. . | Family income . | Hindu . | Married . |
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . | (7) . | (8) . |
25% discount | 0.037 | −0.064 | 0.057 | 0.011 | 0.380 | 0.012 | −0.068 | −0.012 |
(0.071) | (0.073) | (1.546) | (0.894) | (0.816) | (0.079) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
50% discount | 0.013 | −0.056 | 0.781 | −0.762 | 0.152 | 0.005 | 0.010 | −0.055 |
(0.070) | (0.073) | (1.533) | (0.890) | (0.812) | (0.078) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
75% discount | 0.049 | 0.020 | 1.239 | 0.958 | −0.522 | 0.032 | 0.040 | 0.025 |
(0.072) | (0.074) | (1.564) | (0.908) | (0.825) | (0.080) | (0.071) | (0.068) | |
90% discount | −0.074 | 0.077 | 2.484 | −0.188 | −1.040 | −0.003 | −0.018 | −0.006 |
(0.072) | (0.074) | (1.559) | (0.902) | (0.823) | (0.079) | (0.071) | (0.068) | |
10% discount × discussion | −0.014 | −0.056 | 0.741 | −0.227 | 0.240 | −0.104 | −0.004 | −0.067 |
(0.072) | (0.074) | (1.560) | (0.906) | (0.823) | (0.079) | (0.071) | (0.068) | |
25% discount × discussion | −0.037 | 0.008 | 1.798 | −0.884 | −0.067 | −0.040 | 0.048 | 0.019 |
(0.071) | (0.074) | (1.548) | (0.899) | (0.814) | (0.079) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
50% discount × discussion | −0.036 | 0.080 | 1.691 | 0.537 | −1.270 | −0.027 | 0.060 | 0.033 |
(0.071) | (0.073) | (1.544) | (0.900) | (0.818) | (0.079) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
75% discount × discussion | −0.064 | −0.021 | −0.319 | −0.784 | 0.856 | −0.069 | −0.030 | −0.118* |
(0.071) | (0.073) | (1.537) | (0.893) | (0.808) | (0.078) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
90% discount × discussion | 0.037 | −0.077 | −1.386 | 0.152 | 1.124 | −0.150* | −0.041 | −0.033 |
(0.070) | (0.072) | (1.516) | (0.877) | (0.797) | (0.077) | (0.069) | (0.066) | |
F-statistics | 0.334 | 0.574 | 0.708 | 0.443 | 1.226 | 1.283 | 0.362 | 0.925 |
|$\Pr (\gt F)$| | 0.892 | 0.72 | 0.618 | 0.818 | 0.295 | 0.269 | 0.874 | 0.464 |
Observations | 687 | 687 | 687 | 682 | 684 | 687 | 687 | 686 |
. | Dependent variable: . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | Brahmin . | Chhetri . | Age . | Educ. . | Father educ. . | Family income . | Hindu . | Married . |
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . | (7) . | (8) . |
25% discount | 0.037 | −0.064 | 0.057 | 0.011 | 0.380 | 0.012 | −0.068 | −0.012 |
(0.071) | (0.073) | (1.546) | (0.894) | (0.816) | (0.079) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
50% discount | 0.013 | −0.056 | 0.781 | −0.762 | 0.152 | 0.005 | 0.010 | −0.055 |
(0.070) | (0.073) | (1.533) | (0.890) | (0.812) | (0.078) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
75% discount | 0.049 | 0.020 | 1.239 | 0.958 | −0.522 | 0.032 | 0.040 | 0.025 |
(0.072) | (0.074) | (1.564) | (0.908) | (0.825) | (0.080) | (0.071) | (0.068) | |
90% discount | −0.074 | 0.077 | 2.484 | −0.188 | −1.040 | −0.003 | −0.018 | −0.006 |
(0.072) | (0.074) | (1.559) | (0.902) | (0.823) | (0.079) | (0.071) | (0.068) | |
10% discount × discussion | −0.014 | −0.056 | 0.741 | −0.227 | 0.240 | −0.104 | −0.004 | −0.067 |
(0.072) | (0.074) | (1.560) | (0.906) | (0.823) | (0.079) | (0.071) | (0.068) | |
25% discount × discussion | −0.037 | 0.008 | 1.798 | −0.884 | −0.067 | −0.040 | 0.048 | 0.019 |
(0.071) | (0.074) | (1.548) | (0.899) | (0.814) | (0.079) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
50% discount × discussion | −0.036 | 0.080 | 1.691 | 0.537 | −1.270 | −0.027 | 0.060 | 0.033 |
(0.071) | (0.073) | (1.544) | (0.900) | (0.818) | (0.079) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
75% discount × discussion | −0.064 | −0.021 | −0.319 | −0.784 | 0.856 | −0.069 | −0.030 | −0.118* |
(0.071) | (0.073) | (1.537) | (0.893) | (0.808) | (0.078) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
90% discount × discussion | 0.037 | −0.077 | −1.386 | 0.152 | 1.124 | −0.150* | −0.041 | −0.033 |
(0.070) | (0.072) | (1.516) | (0.877) | (0.797) | (0.077) | (0.069) | (0.066) | |
F-statistics | 0.334 | 0.574 | 0.708 | 0.443 | 1.226 | 1.283 | 0.362 | 0.925 |
|$\Pr (\gt F)$| | 0.892 | 0.72 | 0.618 | 0.818 | 0.295 | 0.269 | 0.874 | 0.464 |
Observations | 687 | 687 | 687 | 682 | 684 | 687 | 687 | 686 |
Source: Authors’ calculation.
Note: The table shows the balance across different treatment arms on demographic characteristics. The characteristic indicated in the column headings is regressed on treatment dummies. The columns include the following variables: (1) Brahmin household, (2) Chhetri household, (3) age, (4) years of schooling, (5) years of father’s schooling, (6) family income of Rs. 0–25,000 per month, (7) Hindu religion, and (8) whether an individual is married. The F-statistics are from the joint hypothesis testing under the null that the coefficients on the subsidy-plus-discussion group are jointly equal to zero. The p-values corresponding to the respective F-statistic are reported. Standard errors are presented in parentheses. All regressions account for the stratification variable. Table S3.2 in the supplementary online appendix performs a similar balance exercise to the table above, albeit after excluding non-compliers in the subsidy-plus-discussion group.
. | Dependent variable: . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | Brahmin . | Chhetri . | Age . | Educ. . | Father educ. . | Family income . | Hindu . | Married . |
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . | (7) . | (8) . |
25% discount | 0.037 | −0.064 | 0.057 | 0.011 | 0.380 | 0.012 | −0.068 | −0.012 |
(0.071) | (0.073) | (1.546) | (0.894) | (0.816) | (0.079) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
50% discount | 0.013 | −0.056 | 0.781 | −0.762 | 0.152 | 0.005 | 0.010 | −0.055 |
(0.070) | (0.073) | (1.533) | (0.890) | (0.812) | (0.078) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
75% discount | 0.049 | 0.020 | 1.239 | 0.958 | −0.522 | 0.032 | 0.040 | 0.025 |
(0.072) | (0.074) | (1.564) | (0.908) | (0.825) | (0.080) | (0.071) | (0.068) | |
90% discount | −0.074 | 0.077 | 2.484 | −0.188 | −1.040 | −0.003 | −0.018 | −0.006 |
(0.072) | (0.074) | (1.559) | (0.902) | (0.823) | (0.079) | (0.071) | (0.068) | |
10% discount × discussion | −0.014 | −0.056 | 0.741 | −0.227 | 0.240 | −0.104 | −0.004 | −0.067 |
(0.072) | (0.074) | (1.560) | (0.906) | (0.823) | (0.079) | (0.071) | (0.068) | |
25% discount × discussion | −0.037 | 0.008 | 1.798 | −0.884 | −0.067 | −0.040 | 0.048 | 0.019 |
(0.071) | (0.074) | (1.548) | (0.899) | (0.814) | (0.079) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
50% discount × discussion | −0.036 | 0.080 | 1.691 | 0.537 | −1.270 | −0.027 | 0.060 | 0.033 |
(0.071) | (0.073) | (1.544) | (0.900) | (0.818) | (0.079) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
75% discount × discussion | −0.064 | −0.021 | −0.319 | −0.784 | 0.856 | −0.069 | −0.030 | −0.118* |
(0.071) | (0.073) | (1.537) | (0.893) | (0.808) | (0.078) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
90% discount × discussion | 0.037 | −0.077 | −1.386 | 0.152 | 1.124 | −0.150* | −0.041 | −0.033 |
(0.070) | (0.072) | (1.516) | (0.877) | (0.797) | (0.077) | (0.069) | (0.066) | |
F-statistics | 0.334 | 0.574 | 0.708 | 0.443 | 1.226 | 1.283 | 0.362 | 0.925 |
|$\Pr (\gt F)$| | 0.892 | 0.72 | 0.618 | 0.818 | 0.295 | 0.269 | 0.874 | 0.464 |
Observations | 687 | 687 | 687 | 682 | 684 | 687 | 687 | 686 |
. | Dependent variable: . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | Brahmin . | Chhetri . | Age . | Educ. . | Father educ. . | Family income . | Hindu . | Married . |
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . | (7) . | (8) . |
25% discount | 0.037 | −0.064 | 0.057 | 0.011 | 0.380 | 0.012 | −0.068 | −0.012 |
(0.071) | (0.073) | (1.546) | (0.894) | (0.816) | (0.079) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
50% discount | 0.013 | −0.056 | 0.781 | −0.762 | 0.152 | 0.005 | 0.010 | −0.055 |
(0.070) | (0.073) | (1.533) | (0.890) | (0.812) | (0.078) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
75% discount | 0.049 | 0.020 | 1.239 | 0.958 | −0.522 | 0.032 | 0.040 | 0.025 |
(0.072) | (0.074) | (1.564) | (0.908) | (0.825) | (0.080) | (0.071) | (0.068) | |
90% discount | −0.074 | 0.077 | 2.484 | −0.188 | −1.040 | −0.003 | −0.018 | −0.006 |
(0.072) | (0.074) | (1.559) | (0.902) | (0.823) | (0.079) | (0.071) | (0.068) | |
10% discount × discussion | −0.014 | −0.056 | 0.741 | −0.227 | 0.240 | −0.104 | −0.004 | −0.067 |
(0.072) | (0.074) | (1.560) | (0.906) | (0.823) | (0.079) | (0.071) | (0.068) | |
25% discount × discussion | −0.037 | 0.008 | 1.798 | −0.884 | −0.067 | −0.040 | 0.048 | 0.019 |
(0.071) | (0.074) | (1.548) | (0.899) | (0.814) | (0.079) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
50% discount × discussion | −0.036 | 0.080 | 1.691 | 0.537 | −1.270 | −0.027 | 0.060 | 0.033 |
(0.071) | (0.073) | (1.544) | (0.900) | (0.818) | (0.079) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
75% discount × discussion | −0.064 | −0.021 | −0.319 | −0.784 | 0.856 | −0.069 | −0.030 | −0.118* |
(0.071) | (0.073) | (1.537) | (0.893) | (0.808) | (0.078) | (0.070) | (0.067) | |
90% discount × discussion | 0.037 | −0.077 | −1.386 | 0.152 | 1.124 | −0.150* | −0.041 | −0.033 |
(0.070) | (0.072) | (1.516) | (0.877) | (0.797) | (0.077) | (0.069) | (0.066) | |
F-statistics | 0.334 | 0.574 | 0.708 | 0.443 | 1.226 | 1.283 | 0.362 | 0.925 |
|$\Pr (\gt F)$| | 0.892 | 0.72 | 0.618 | 0.818 | 0.295 | 0.269 | 0.874 | 0.464 |
Observations | 687 | 687 | 687 | 682 | 684 | 687 | 687 | 686 |
Source: Authors’ calculation.
Note: The table shows the balance across different treatment arms on demographic characteristics. The characteristic indicated in the column headings is regressed on treatment dummies. The columns include the following variables: (1) Brahmin household, (2) Chhetri household, (3) age, (4) years of schooling, (5) years of father’s schooling, (6) family income of Rs. 0–25,000 per month, (7) Hindu religion, and (8) whether an individual is married. The F-statistics are from the joint hypothesis testing under the null that the coefficients on the subsidy-plus-discussion group are jointly equal to zero. The p-values corresponding to the respective F-statistic are reported. Standard errors are presented in parentheses. All regressions account for the stratification variable. Table S3.2 in the supplementary online appendix performs a similar balance exercise to the table above, albeit after excluding non-compliers in the subsidy-plus-discussion group.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.