Considered variables and their influence on the number of foraging IFF in different foraging sites of the study area in Kolkata, West Bengal, India [Values with bold number and * mark indicate a significant positive influence in abundance of foraging IFF between four different foraging sites of Kolkata according to Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with negative binomial distribution and log-link analysis (P < 0.05)].
| Model term . | Coefficient . | Std. error . | t . | Sig. . | 95% Confidence interval . | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower . | Upper . | |||||
| Intercept | 9.459 | 6.389 | 1.481 | 0.155 | −3.913 | 22.831 |
| Built-up area (BUA) | −0.000 | 0.000 | −1.095 | 0.287 | −0.000 | 0.000 |
| Water area (WA) | −0.000 | 0.000 | −1.305 | 0.208 | −0.000 | 0.000 |
| Tree cover (TC) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 6.6562 | 0.000* | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Anthropogenic disturbances (AD) | −0.002 | 0.004 | −0.496 | 0.626 | −0.010 | 0.006 |
| Model term . | Coefficient . | Std. error . | t . | Sig. . | 95% Confidence interval . | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower . | Upper . | |||||
| Intercept | 9.459 | 6.389 | 1.481 | 0.155 | −3.913 | 22.831 |
| Built-up area (BUA) | −0.000 | 0.000 | −1.095 | 0.287 | −0.000 | 0.000 |
| Water area (WA) | −0.000 | 0.000 | −1.305 | 0.208 | −0.000 | 0.000 |
| Tree cover (TC) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 6.6562 | 0.000* | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Anthropogenic disturbances (AD) | −0.002 | 0.004 | −0.496 | 0.626 | −0.010 | 0.006 |
Considered variables and their influence on the number of foraging IFF in different foraging sites of the study area in Kolkata, West Bengal, India [Values with bold number and * mark indicate a significant positive influence in abundance of foraging IFF between four different foraging sites of Kolkata according to Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with negative binomial distribution and log-link analysis (P < 0.05)].
| Model term . | Coefficient . | Std. error . | t . | Sig. . | 95% Confidence interval . | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower . | Upper . | |||||
| Intercept | 9.459 | 6.389 | 1.481 | 0.155 | −3.913 | 22.831 |
| Built-up area (BUA) | −0.000 | 0.000 | −1.095 | 0.287 | −0.000 | 0.000 |
| Water area (WA) | −0.000 | 0.000 | −1.305 | 0.208 | −0.000 | 0.000 |
| Tree cover (TC) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 6.6562 | 0.000* | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Anthropogenic disturbances (AD) | −0.002 | 0.004 | −0.496 | 0.626 | −0.010 | 0.006 |
| Model term . | Coefficient . | Std. error . | t . | Sig. . | 95% Confidence interval . | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower . | Upper . | |||||
| Intercept | 9.459 | 6.389 | 1.481 | 0.155 | −3.913 | 22.831 |
| Built-up area (BUA) | −0.000 | 0.000 | −1.095 | 0.287 | −0.000 | 0.000 |
| Water area (WA) | −0.000 | 0.000 | −1.305 | 0.208 | −0.000 | 0.000 |
| Tree cover (TC) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 6.6562 | 0.000* | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Anthropogenic disturbances (AD) | −0.002 | 0.004 | −0.496 | 0.626 | −0.010 | 0.006 |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
