Table 3:

Foraging tree species and their influence on the number of foraging IFF in different foraging sites of the study area in Kolkata, West Bengal, India [Values with bold number and * mark indicate a significant positive influence in abundance of foraging IFF between the foraging trees in four different foraging sites of Kolkata according to Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs) with negative binomial distribution and log-link analysis (P < 0.05)]

Model termCoefficientStd. errortSig.95% Confidence interval
LowerUpper
Intercept2.1880.5374.0740.000*1.1323.244
ACA0.4890.7580.6450.519−1.0021.980
AHE0.2560.7590.3380.736−1.2351.748
BLA0.3310.7590.4360.663−1.1611.823
CNU−0.2380.760−0.3120.755−1.7321.257
CPA−0.8310.763−1.0890.277−2.3320.670
ERO0.3360.7590.4430.658−1.1551.828
FBE2.2590.7572.9850.003*0.7713.747
FGL1.0210.7571.3480.179−0.4682.510
FRE1.5410.7572.0360.043*0.0523.029
MIN0.6260.7580.8260.409−0.8642.117
MZA−0.2360.760−0.3110.756−1.7311.259
MPA0.0210.7590.0270.978−1.4721.514
PLO−0.7160.763−0.9390.349−2.2150.784
PGU−0.0390.760−0.0520.959−1.5331.454
SCU0.6330.7580.8350.404−0.8582.123
Model termCoefficientStd. errortSig.95% Confidence interval
LowerUpper
Intercept2.1880.5374.0740.000*1.1323.244
ACA0.4890.7580.6450.519−1.0021.980
AHE0.2560.7590.3380.736−1.2351.748
BLA0.3310.7590.4360.663−1.1611.823
CNU−0.2380.760−0.3120.755−1.7321.257
CPA−0.8310.763−1.0890.277−2.3320.670
ERO0.3360.7590.4430.658−1.1551.828
FBE2.2590.7572.9850.003*0.7713.747
FGL1.0210.7571.3480.179−0.4682.510
FRE1.5410.7572.0360.043*0.0523.029
MIN0.6260.7580.8260.409−0.8642.117
MZA−0.2360.760−0.3110.756−1.7311.259
MPA0.0210.7590.0270.978−1.4721.514
PLO−0.7160.763−0.9390.349−2.2150.784
PGU−0.0390.760−0.0520.959−1.5331.454
SCU0.6330.7580.8350.404−0.8582.123
Table 3:

Foraging tree species and their influence on the number of foraging IFF in different foraging sites of the study area in Kolkata, West Bengal, India [Values with bold number and * mark indicate a significant positive influence in abundance of foraging IFF between the foraging trees in four different foraging sites of Kolkata according to Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs) with negative binomial distribution and log-link analysis (P < 0.05)]

Model termCoefficientStd. errortSig.95% Confidence interval
LowerUpper
Intercept2.1880.5374.0740.000*1.1323.244
ACA0.4890.7580.6450.519−1.0021.980
AHE0.2560.7590.3380.736−1.2351.748
BLA0.3310.7590.4360.663−1.1611.823
CNU−0.2380.760−0.3120.755−1.7321.257
CPA−0.8310.763−1.0890.277−2.3320.670
ERO0.3360.7590.4430.658−1.1551.828
FBE2.2590.7572.9850.003*0.7713.747
FGL1.0210.7571.3480.179−0.4682.510
FRE1.5410.7572.0360.043*0.0523.029
MIN0.6260.7580.8260.409−0.8642.117
MZA−0.2360.760−0.3110.756−1.7311.259
MPA0.0210.7590.0270.978−1.4721.514
PLO−0.7160.763−0.9390.349−2.2150.784
PGU−0.0390.760−0.0520.959−1.5331.454
SCU0.6330.7580.8350.404−0.8582.123
Model termCoefficientStd. errortSig.95% Confidence interval
LowerUpper
Intercept2.1880.5374.0740.000*1.1323.244
ACA0.4890.7580.6450.519−1.0021.980
AHE0.2560.7590.3380.736−1.2351.748
BLA0.3310.7590.4360.663−1.1611.823
CNU−0.2380.760−0.3120.755−1.7321.257
CPA−0.8310.763−1.0890.277−2.3320.670
ERO0.3360.7590.4430.658−1.1551.828
FBE2.2590.7572.9850.003*0.7713.747
FGL1.0210.7571.3480.179−0.4682.510
FRE1.5410.7572.0360.043*0.0523.029
MIN0.6260.7580.8260.409−0.8642.117
MZA−0.2360.760−0.3110.756−1.7311.259
MPA0.0210.7590.0270.978−1.4721.514
PLO−0.7160.763−0.9390.349−2.2150.784
PGU−0.0390.760−0.0520.959−1.5331.454
SCU0.6330.7580.8350.404−0.8582.123
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close