Table 2

Findings at EMB concerning histomorphology and immunohistochemistry

Morphologyn = 129
 Sample thickness, mm2.73 ± 1.28
 Sample area, mm211.95 (7.15–29.90)
 Endocardium inclusion114 (88.4%)
 Cardiomyocyte diameter, μma36.38 ± 7.12
 Endocardium thicknessb, μm134.0 (76.5–205.7)
 Elastic depositionc114 (88.4%)
 Elastic/endocardium ratio0.38 ± 0.18
 Disarrayd20 (15.5%)
 Vascular abnormalitiese79 (61.2%)
 Perivascular fibrosis123 (95.3%)
 Replacement fibrosisf41 (31.8%)
 Quantification of fibrosis, %11.90 (6.54–19.97)
 Cardiomyocyte ischaemic like changes58 (45%)
Immunohistochemistrygn = 129
 Alpha-actin89 (69%)
 CD45+107 (82.9%)
 CD45+/fieldh3.0 (1.1–6.0)
 CD3+102 (79.1%)
 CD20+7 (5.4%)
 CD68+68 (47.3%)
Immunohistochemistry for collagen type and ECM remodelling, n = 60
 Perivascular Type I collagen60 (100%)
 Tenascin C15 (25.0%)
 Fibronectin49 (81.7%)
Morphologyn = 129
 Sample thickness, mm2.73 ± 1.28
 Sample area, mm211.95 (7.15–29.90)
 Endocardium inclusion114 (88.4%)
 Cardiomyocyte diameter, μma36.38 ± 7.12
 Endocardium thicknessb, μm134.0 (76.5–205.7)
 Elastic depositionc114 (88.4%)
 Elastic/endocardium ratio0.38 ± 0.18
 Disarrayd20 (15.5%)
 Vascular abnormalitiese79 (61.2%)
 Perivascular fibrosis123 (95.3%)
 Replacement fibrosisf41 (31.8%)
 Quantification of fibrosis, %11.90 (6.54–19.97)
 Cardiomyocyte ischaemic like changes58 (45%)
Immunohistochemistrygn = 129
 Alpha-actin89 (69%)
 CD45+107 (82.9%)
 CD45+/fieldh3.0 (1.1–6.0)
 CD3+102 (79.1%)
 CD20+7 (5.4%)
 CD68+68 (47.3%)
Immunohistochemistry for collagen type and ECM remodelling, n = 60
 Perivascular Type I collagen60 (100%)
 Tenascin C15 (25.0%)
 Fibronectin49 (81.7%)

Values are median (interquartile range), mean ± standard deviation.

aTransversal measurement performed at the centre cell plane (cross-section encompassing the nucleus at haematoxylin–eosin × 40).

bAs the mean of 5–10 measurements.

cIdentified at elastic van Gieson’s stain.

dConsidered when in the presence of cellular interlacing, whirling, or herringbone architecture arrangement.

eConsidered for abnormal vessel walls (intimal and medial smooth muscle cell hyperplasia; luminal distortion and narrowing).

fDefined for large coalescent areas of fibrosis.

gCaspase-3 was un-interpretable; CD90 had inconsistent ground noise positivity and was also considered un-interpretable.

hNumber of positive cells per ×20 amplification field of view.

Table 2

Findings at EMB concerning histomorphology and immunohistochemistry

Morphologyn = 129
 Sample thickness, mm2.73 ± 1.28
 Sample area, mm211.95 (7.15–29.90)
 Endocardium inclusion114 (88.4%)
 Cardiomyocyte diameter, μma36.38 ± 7.12
 Endocardium thicknessb, μm134.0 (76.5–205.7)
 Elastic depositionc114 (88.4%)
 Elastic/endocardium ratio0.38 ± 0.18
 Disarrayd20 (15.5%)
 Vascular abnormalitiese79 (61.2%)
 Perivascular fibrosis123 (95.3%)
 Replacement fibrosisf41 (31.8%)
 Quantification of fibrosis, %11.90 (6.54–19.97)
 Cardiomyocyte ischaemic like changes58 (45%)
Immunohistochemistrygn = 129
 Alpha-actin89 (69%)
 CD45+107 (82.9%)
 CD45+/fieldh3.0 (1.1–6.0)
 CD3+102 (79.1%)
 CD20+7 (5.4%)
 CD68+68 (47.3%)
Immunohistochemistry for collagen type and ECM remodelling, n = 60
 Perivascular Type I collagen60 (100%)
 Tenascin C15 (25.0%)
 Fibronectin49 (81.7%)
Morphologyn = 129
 Sample thickness, mm2.73 ± 1.28
 Sample area, mm211.95 (7.15–29.90)
 Endocardium inclusion114 (88.4%)
 Cardiomyocyte diameter, μma36.38 ± 7.12
 Endocardium thicknessb, μm134.0 (76.5–205.7)
 Elastic depositionc114 (88.4%)
 Elastic/endocardium ratio0.38 ± 0.18
 Disarrayd20 (15.5%)
 Vascular abnormalitiese79 (61.2%)
 Perivascular fibrosis123 (95.3%)
 Replacement fibrosisf41 (31.8%)
 Quantification of fibrosis, %11.90 (6.54–19.97)
 Cardiomyocyte ischaemic like changes58 (45%)
Immunohistochemistrygn = 129
 Alpha-actin89 (69%)
 CD45+107 (82.9%)
 CD45+/fieldh3.0 (1.1–6.0)
 CD3+102 (79.1%)
 CD20+7 (5.4%)
 CD68+68 (47.3%)
Immunohistochemistry for collagen type and ECM remodelling, n = 60
 Perivascular Type I collagen60 (100%)
 Tenascin C15 (25.0%)
 Fibronectin49 (81.7%)

Values are median (interquartile range), mean ± standard deviation.

aTransversal measurement performed at the centre cell plane (cross-section encompassing the nucleus at haematoxylin–eosin × 40).

bAs the mean of 5–10 measurements.

cIdentified at elastic van Gieson’s stain.

dConsidered when in the presence of cellular interlacing, whirling, or herringbone architecture arrangement.

eConsidered for abnormal vessel walls (intimal and medial smooth muscle cell hyperplasia; luminal distortion and narrowing).

fDefined for large coalescent areas of fibrosis.

gCaspase-3 was un-interpretable; CD90 had inconsistent ground noise positivity and was also considered un-interpretable.

hNumber of positive cells per ×20 amplification field of view.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close