Table 1.

Effects of Linguistic Politeness on Belief Accuracy and Message Evaluation (Study 1)

Perceived gface threatBelief accuracyPerceived article persuasiveness
Linguistic politeness
Honorific (vs. non-honorific)−0.37* (0.16)−0.14 (0.18)0.24 (0.17)
Perceived face threat−0.48*** (0.07)−0.25*** (0.07)
R20.020.160.07
Perceived gface threatBelief accuracyPerceived article persuasiveness
Linguistic politeness
Honorific (vs. non-honorific)−0.37* (0.16)−0.14 (0.18)0.24 (0.17)
Perceived face threat−0.48*** (0.07)−0.25*** (0.07)
R20.020.160.07

Note: N = 240. Cell entries are unstandardized OLS regression coefficients and standard errors in parentheses.

*p < .05,

***p < .001.

Table 1.

Effects of Linguistic Politeness on Belief Accuracy and Message Evaluation (Study 1)

Perceived gface threatBelief accuracyPerceived article persuasiveness
Linguistic politeness
Honorific (vs. non-honorific)−0.37* (0.16)−0.14 (0.18)0.24 (0.17)
Perceived face threat−0.48*** (0.07)−0.25*** (0.07)
R20.020.160.07
Perceived gface threatBelief accuracyPerceived article persuasiveness
Linguistic politeness
Honorific (vs. non-honorific)−0.37* (0.16)−0.14 (0.18)0.24 (0.17)
Perceived face threat−0.48*** (0.07)−0.25*** (0.07)
R20.020.160.07

Note: N = 240. Cell entries are unstandardized OLS regression coefficients and standard errors in parentheses.

*p < .05,

***p < .001.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close