Table 4.

Factor scores for different statements across the two extracted factors.

Statement numberStatementsFactor 1Factor 2
S4Local service provision (repair services) needs to be improved if the solar irrigation pumps are to be scaled up.3*2*
S15Upfront cost is too high for the farmers and many small and marginal farmers may not be able to afford.31
S12Since electricity for pumping is free, farmer has no incentive to adopt the Solar Irrigation Pumps.20
S1Farmers lack awareness about the Solar Irrigation Pumps.2−2
S5Small and marginal farmers might find it difficult to avail loan from bank due need of the securities or hypothecation.2−2
S8Lack of technology to use the solar power for purposes other than pumping.1−1
S3Lack of coordination among different departments having overlapping concerns related to water, food and solar energy would act as impediment.13
S18Environmental benefits and subsidy cannot be drivers for scaling up the technology on its own.1*2*
S14In attempting grid connection and net metering, farmers would be sceptical about the net metering, and subsequent withdrawal of free electricity which they are enjoying now.0−2
S19Decrease in efficiency of solar panels if not maintained well0−3
S10Farmer perceive Solar Irrigation Pumps as complex technology; hence it is difficult to convince them to adopt.0−3
S2Governance issues at last-mile delivery—Utilities or MNRE has no experience of dealing with farmers—It would be difficult to convince farmers and then to maintain the solar pumps/grid.03
S20Grid connection and Net metering are challenging for utilities when scaled up as it becomes very difficult to maintain the load balance at the grid level.−1*−1*
S17Solar Irrigation Pumps expansion requires regional-level planning and implementation—which is difficult.−12
S9Solar pumps are difficult to implement, alternative like Solar Parks is better option.−10
S7Impact of solar irrigation pumps on groundwater, equity, cropping pattern, etc., is not yet clear. Scaling it up needs more conviction and pilot projects.−20
S11Utilities are already constrained with respect to resources—both human and financial. Solar Irrigation Pumps will be additional burden on them.−21
S6Solar energy may be green but not the panels. Over the years unused panels might become a junk.−2−1
S13Greening the grid is more viable than small individual solar irrigation pumps. Promoting farmers with barren lands to install solar panel is better option.−31
S16Expansion of Solar Irrigation Pump could lead to over-exploitation of groundwater.−30
Statement numberStatementsFactor 1Factor 2
S4Local service provision (repair services) needs to be improved if the solar irrigation pumps are to be scaled up.3*2*
S15Upfront cost is too high for the farmers and many small and marginal farmers may not be able to afford.31
S12Since electricity for pumping is free, farmer has no incentive to adopt the Solar Irrigation Pumps.20
S1Farmers lack awareness about the Solar Irrigation Pumps.2−2
S5Small and marginal farmers might find it difficult to avail loan from bank due need of the securities or hypothecation.2−2
S8Lack of technology to use the solar power for purposes other than pumping.1−1
S3Lack of coordination among different departments having overlapping concerns related to water, food and solar energy would act as impediment.13
S18Environmental benefits and subsidy cannot be drivers for scaling up the technology on its own.1*2*
S14In attempting grid connection and net metering, farmers would be sceptical about the net metering, and subsequent withdrawal of free electricity which they are enjoying now.0−2
S19Decrease in efficiency of solar panels if not maintained well0−3
S10Farmer perceive Solar Irrigation Pumps as complex technology; hence it is difficult to convince them to adopt.0−3
S2Governance issues at last-mile delivery—Utilities or MNRE has no experience of dealing with farmers—It would be difficult to convince farmers and then to maintain the solar pumps/grid.03
S20Grid connection and Net metering are challenging for utilities when scaled up as it becomes very difficult to maintain the load balance at the grid level.−1*−1*
S17Solar Irrigation Pumps expansion requires regional-level planning and implementation—which is difficult.−12
S9Solar pumps are difficult to implement, alternative like Solar Parks is better option.−10
S7Impact of solar irrigation pumps on groundwater, equity, cropping pattern, etc., is not yet clear. Scaling it up needs more conviction and pilot projects.−20
S11Utilities are already constrained with respect to resources—both human and financial. Solar Irrigation Pumps will be additional burden on them.−21
S6Solar energy may be green but not the panels. Over the years unused panels might become a junk.−2−1
S13Greening the grid is more viable than small individual solar irrigation pumps. Promoting farmers with barren lands to install solar panel is better option.−31
S16Expansion of Solar Irrigation Pump could lead to over-exploitation of groundwater.−30

* Indicates the consensus statements.

Table 4.

Factor scores for different statements across the two extracted factors.

Statement numberStatementsFactor 1Factor 2
S4Local service provision (repair services) needs to be improved if the solar irrigation pumps are to be scaled up.3*2*
S15Upfront cost is too high for the farmers and many small and marginal farmers may not be able to afford.31
S12Since electricity for pumping is free, farmer has no incentive to adopt the Solar Irrigation Pumps.20
S1Farmers lack awareness about the Solar Irrigation Pumps.2−2
S5Small and marginal farmers might find it difficult to avail loan from bank due need of the securities or hypothecation.2−2
S8Lack of technology to use the solar power for purposes other than pumping.1−1
S3Lack of coordination among different departments having overlapping concerns related to water, food and solar energy would act as impediment.13
S18Environmental benefits and subsidy cannot be drivers for scaling up the technology on its own.1*2*
S14In attempting grid connection and net metering, farmers would be sceptical about the net metering, and subsequent withdrawal of free electricity which they are enjoying now.0−2
S19Decrease in efficiency of solar panels if not maintained well0−3
S10Farmer perceive Solar Irrigation Pumps as complex technology; hence it is difficult to convince them to adopt.0−3
S2Governance issues at last-mile delivery—Utilities or MNRE has no experience of dealing with farmers—It would be difficult to convince farmers and then to maintain the solar pumps/grid.03
S20Grid connection and Net metering are challenging for utilities when scaled up as it becomes very difficult to maintain the load balance at the grid level.−1*−1*
S17Solar Irrigation Pumps expansion requires regional-level planning and implementation—which is difficult.−12
S9Solar pumps are difficult to implement, alternative like Solar Parks is better option.−10
S7Impact of solar irrigation pumps on groundwater, equity, cropping pattern, etc., is not yet clear. Scaling it up needs more conviction and pilot projects.−20
S11Utilities are already constrained with respect to resources—both human and financial. Solar Irrigation Pumps will be additional burden on them.−21
S6Solar energy may be green but not the panels. Over the years unused panels might become a junk.−2−1
S13Greening the grid is more viable than small individual solar irrigation pumps. Promoting farmers with barren lands to install solar panel is better option.−31
S16Expansion of Solar Irrigation Pump could lead to over-exploitation of groundwater.−30
Statement numberStatementsFactor 1Factor 2
S4Local service provision (repair services) needs to be improved if the solar irrigation pumps are to be scaled up.3*2*
S15Upfront cost is too high for the farmers and many small and marginal farmers may not be able to afford.31
S12Since electricity for pumping is free, farmer has no incentive to adopt the Solar Irrigation Pumps.20
S1Farmers lack awareness about the Solar Irrigation Pumps.2−2
S5Small and marginal farmers might find it difficult to avail loan from bank due need of the securities or hypothecation.2−2
S8Lack of technology to use the solar power for purposes other than pumping.1−1
S3Lack of coordination among different departments having overlapping concerns related to water, food and solar energy would act as impediment.13
S18Environmental benefits and subsidy cannot be drivers for scaling up the technology on its own.1*2*
S14In attempting grid connection and net metering, farmers would be sceptical about the net metering, and subsequent withdrawal of free electricity which they are enjoying now.0−2
S19Decrease in efficiency of solar panels if not maintained well0−3
S10Farmer perceive Solar Irrigation Pumps as complex technology; hence it is difficult to convince them to adopt.0−3
S2Governance issues at last-mile delivery—Utilities or MNRE has no experience of dealing with farmers—It would be difficult to convince farmers and then to maintain the solar pumps/grid.03
S20Grid connection and Net metering are challenging for utilities when scaled up as it becomes very difficult to maintain the load balance at the grid level.−1*−1*
S17Solar Irrigation Pumps expansion requires regional-level planning and implementation—which is difficult.−12
S9Solar pumps are difficult to implement, alternative like Solar Parks is better option.−10
S7Impact of solar irrigation pumps on groundwater, equity, cropping pattern, etc., is not yet clear. Scaling it up needs more conviction and pilot projects.−20
S11Utilities are already constrained with respect to resources—both human and financial. Solar Irrigation Pumps will be additional burden on them.−21
S6Solar energy may be green but not the panels. Over the years unused panels might become a junk.−2−1
S13Greening the grid is more viable than small individual solar irrigation pumps. Promoting farmers with barren lands to install solar panel is better option.−31
S16Expansion of Solar Irrigation Pump could lead to over-exploitation of groundwater.−30

* Indicates the consensus statements.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close