. | Harvesting & pod-breaking . | Farm preparation . | Employed child labor . | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | Control . | Treatment . | Control . | Treatment . | Control . | Treatment . | ||||||
y-value . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . |
0 | 79 | 3.43 | 52 | 2.41 | 65 | 3.02 | 67 | 2.91 | 79 | 3.43 | 59 | 2.74 |
1 | 681 | 29.56 | 555 | 25.77 | 682 | 31.66 | 646 | 28.04 | 614 | 26.65 | 569 | 26.42 |
2 | 1,218 | 52.86 | 1,062 | 49.30 | 973 | 45.17 | 991 | 43.01 | 1,128 | 48.96 | 889 | 41.27 |
3 | 326 | 14.15 | 271 | 12.58 | 434 | 20.15 | 323 | 14.02 | 483 | 20.96 | 305 | 14.16 |
4 | 214 | 9.94 | 277 | 12.02 | 332 | 15.41 | ||||||
Total | 2,304 | 2,154 | 2,154 | 2,304 | 2,304 | 2,154 |
. | Harvesting & pod-breaking . | Farm preparation . | Employed child labor . | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | Control . | Treatment . | Control . | Treatment . | Control . | Treatment . | ||||||
y-value . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . |
0 | 79 | 3.43 | 52 | 2.41 | 65 | 3.02 | 67 | 2.91 | 79 | 3.43 | 59 | 2.74 |
1 | 681 | 29.56 | 555 | 25.77 | 682 | 31.66 | 646 | 28.04 | 614 | 26.65 | 569 | 26.42 |
2 | 1,218 | 52.86 | 1,062 | 49.30 | 973 | 45.17 | 991 | 43.01 | 1,128 | 48.96 | 889 | 41.27 |
3 | 326 | 14.15 | 271 | 12.58 | 434 | 20.15 | 323 | 14.02 | 483 | 20.96 | 305 | 14.16 |
4 | 214 | 9.94 | 277 | 12.02 | 332 | 15.41 | ||||||
Total | 2,304 | 2,154 | 2,154 | 2,304 | 2,304 | 2,154 |
Source: Author’s calculation.
Note: The table shows the distribution of farmers based on the total number of items to which they answered yes. For example, 52.86 percent of farmers in the control group answered affirmatively to two items for harvesting and pod-breaking, compared to 49.30 percent in the treatment group.
. | Harvesting & pod-breaking . | Farm preparation . | Employed child labor . | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | Control . | Treatment . | Control . | Treatment . | Control . | Treatment . | ||||||
y-value . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . |
0 | 79 | 3.43 | 52 | 2.41 | 65 | 3.02 | 67 | 2.91 | 79 | 3.43 | 59 | 2.74 |
1 | 681 | 29.56 | 555 | 25.77 | 682 | 31.66 | 646 | 28.04 | 614 | 26.65 | 569 | 26.42 |
2 | 1,218 | 52.86 | 1,062 | 49.30 | 973 | 45.17 | 991 | 43.01 | 1,128 | 48.96 | 889 | 41.27 |
3 | 326 | 14.15 | 271 | 12.58 | 434 | 20.15 | 323 | 14.02 | 483 | 20.96 | 305 | 14.16 |
4 | 214 | 9.94 | 277 | 12.02 | 332 | 15.41 | ||||||
Total | 2,304 | 2,154 | 2,154 | 2,304 | 2,304 | 2,154 |
. | Harvesting & pod-breaking . | Farm preparation . | Employed child labor . | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | Control . | Treatment . | Control . | Treatment . | Control . | Treatment . | ||||||
y-value . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . | Freq. . | (%) . |
0 | 79 | 3.43 | 52 | 2.41 | 65 | 3.02 | 67 | 2.91 | 79 | 3.43 | 59 | 2.74 |
1 | 681 | 29.56 | 555 | 25.77 | 682 | 31.66 | 646 | 28.04 | 614 | 26.65 | 569 | 26.42 |
2 | 1,218 | 52.86 | 1,062 | 49.30 | 973 | 45.17 | 991 | 43.01 | 1,128 | 48.96 | 889 | 41.27 |
3 | 326 | 14.15 | 271 | 12.58 | 434 | 20.15 | 323 | 14.02 | 483 | 20.96 | 305 | 14.16 |
4 | 214 | 9.94 | 277 | 12.02 | 332 | 15.41 | ||||||
Total | 2,304 | 2,154 | 2,154 | 2,304 | 2,304 | 2,154 |
Source: Author’s calculation.
Note: The table shows the distribution of farmers based on the total number of items to which they answered yes. For example, 52.86 percent of farmers in the control group answered affirmatively to two items for harvesting and pod-breaking, compared to 49.30 percent in the treatment group.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.