Table 5. Open in new tab Stylized...

Attribute	Farmer 1	Farmer 2	Farmer 3
Gender of farmer	Male	Male	Female
Experience of farmer	10 years	20 years	5 years
Formal qualification of farmer	No degree	Business degree	Agricultural degree
Farm size	Large	Moderate	Small
Production type	Conventional	Conventional	Organic
Efficiency of production	Below average	Average	Above average
Animal welfare/Product quality	Standard	Good	Exceptional
Conditions for biodiversity	Poor	Moderate	Good
Carbon footprint per farm	Among highest	Average	Among lowest
Carbon footprint per unit of output	High	Average	Low
Financial situation of farm	Making a profit	Coping	Not profitable
Predicted scores [95 per cent confidence interval^†]
Acceptance of changes in payments—50 per cent decrease in payments	8.19	[7.83–8.55]	5.27	[4.89–5.65]	3.44	[3.06–3.81]
Acceptance of changes in payments—25 per cent decrease in payments	6.97	[6.78–7.16]	5.51	[5.31–5.71]	4.59	[4.39–4.79]
Acceptance of changes in payments—10 per cent decrease in payments	6.24	[6.13–6.34]	5.65	[5.55–5.76]	5.29	[5.18–5.4]
Acceptance of changes in payments—No Change in payments	5.75	[5.67–5.83]	5.75	[5.67–5.83]	5.75	[5.67–5.83]
Acceptance of changes in payments—10 per cent decrease in payments	5.26	[5.16–5.37]	5.85	[5.79–6.19]	6.21	[6.11–6.32]
Acceptance of changes in payments—25 per cent increase in payments	4.53	[4.34–4.72]	5.99	[5.85–6.61]	6.91	[6.71–7.11]
Acceptance of changes in payments—50 per cent increase in payments	3.31	[2.95–3.67]	6.23	[5.33–6.43]	8.06	[7.69–8.44]
Fairness of payments^‡	4.06	[3.89–4.23]	6.21	[6.03–6.38]	7.05	[6.87–7.22]
Intention to petition^‡	4.02	[3.83–4.21]	5.70	[5.51–5.89]	6.62	[6.43–6.81]
Intention to be supplied with produce^‡	5.22	[5.03–5.42]	7.28	[7.09–7.48]	8.51	[8.32–8.71]

Attribute

Farmer 1

Farmer 2

Farmer 3

Gender of farmer

Male

Female

Experience of farmer

10 years

20 years

5 years

Formal qualification of farmer

No degree

Business degree

Agricultural degree

Farm size

Large

Moderate

Small

Production type

Conventional

Organic

Efficiency of production

Below average

Average

Above average

Animal welfare/Product quality

Standard

Good

Exceptional

Conditions for biodiversity

Poor

Moderate

Good

Carbon footprint per farm

Among highest

Average

Among lowest

Carbon footprint per unit of output

High

Average

Low

Financial situation of farm

Making a profit

Coping

Not profitable

Predicted scores [95 per cent confidence interval^†]

Acceptance of changes in payments—50 per cent decrease in payments

8.19

[7.83–8.55]

5.27

[4.89–5.65]

3.44

[3.06–3.81]

Acceptance of changes in payments—25 per cent decrease in payments

6.97

[6.78–7.16]

5.51

[5.31–5.71]

4.59

[4.39–4.79]

Acceptance of changes in payments—10 per cent decrease in payments

6.24

[6.13–6.34]

5.65

[5.55–5.76]

5.29

[5.18–5.4]

Acceptance of changes in payments—No Change in payments

5.75

[5.67–5.83]

5.75

[5.67–5.83]

5.75

[5.67–5.83]

Acceptance of changes in payments—10 per cent decrease in payments

5.26

[5.16–5.37]

5.85

[5.79–6.19]

6.21

[6.11–6.32]

Acceptance of changes in payments—25 per cent increase in payments

4.53

[4.34–4.72]

5.99

[5.85–6.61]

6.91

[6.71–7.11]

Acceptance of changes in payments—50 per cent increase in payments

3.31

[2.95–3.67]

6.23

[5.33–6.43]

8.06

[7.69–8.44]

Fairness of payments^‡

4.06

[3.89–4.23]

6.21

[6.03–6.38]

7.05

[6.87–7.22]

Intention to petition^‡

4.02

[3.83–4.21]

5.70

[5.51–5.89]

6.62

[6.43–6.81]

Intention to be supplied with produce^‡

5.22

[5.03–5.42]

7.28

[7.09–7.48]

8.51

[8.32–8.71]

Attribute	Farmer 1	Farmer 2	Farmer 3
Gender of farmer	Male	Male	Female
Experience of farmer	10 years	20 years	5 years
Formal qualification of farmer	No degree	Business degree	Agricultural degree
Farm size	Large	Moderate	Small
Production type	Conventional	Conventional	Organic
Efficiency of production	Below average	Average	Above average
Animal welfare/Product quality	Standard	Good	Exceptional
Conditions for biodiversity	Poor	Moderate	Good
Carbon footprint per farm	Among highest	Average	Among lowest
Carbon footprint per unit of output	High	Average	Low
Financial situation of farm	Making a profit	Coping	Not profitable
Predicted scores [95 per cent confidence interval^†]
Acceptance of changes in payments—50 per cent decrease in payments	8.19	[7.83–8.55]	5.27	[4.89–5.65]	3.44	[3.06–3.81]
Acceptance of changes in payments—25 per cent decrease in payments	6.97	[6.78–7.16]	5.51	[5.31–5.71]	4.59	[4.39–4.79]
Acceptance of changes in payments—10 per cent decrease in payments	6.24	[6.13–6.34]	5.65	[5.55–5.76]	5.29	[5.18–5.4]
Acceptance of changes in payments—No Change in payments	5.75	[5.67–5.83]	5.75	[5.67–5.83]	5.75	[5.67–5.83]
Acceptance of changes in payments—10 per cent decrease in payments	5.26	[5.16–5.37]	5.85	[5.79–6.19]	6.21	[6.11–6.32]
Acceptance of changes in payments—25 per cent increase in payments	4.53	[4.34–4.72]	5.99	[5.85–6.61]	6.91	[6.71–7.11]
Acceptance of changes in payments—50 per cent increase in payments	3.31	[2.95–3.67]	6.23	[5.33–6.43]	8.06	[7.69–8.44]
Fairness of payments^‡	4.06	[3.89–4.23]	6.21	[6.03–6.38]	7.05	[6.87–7.22]
Intention to petition^‡	4.02	[3.83–4.21]	5.70	[5.51–5.89]	6.62	[6.43–6.81]
Intention to be supplied with produce^‡	5.22	[5.03–5.42]	7.28	[7.09–7.48]	8.51	[8.32–8.71]

Table 5.

Open in new tab

Stylized farmers and predicted scores for the four social acceptance outcomes of interest.

Attribute	Farmer 1		Farmer 2		Farmer 3
Gender of farmer	Male		Male		Female
Experience of farmer	10 years		20 years		5 years
Formal qualification of farmer	No degree		Business degree		Agricultural degree
Farm size	Large		Moderate		Small
Production type	Conventional		Conventional		Organic
Efficiency of production	Below average		Average		Above average
Animal welfare/Product quality	Standard		Good		Exceptional
Conditions for biodiversity	Poor		Moderate		Good
Carbon footprint per farm	Among highest		Average		Among lowest
Carbon footprint per unit of output	High		Average		Low
Financial situation of farm	Making a profit		Coping		Not profitable
Predicted scores [95 per cent confidence interval^†]
Acceptance of changes in payments—50 per cent decrease in payments	8.19	[7.83–8.55]	5.27	[4.89–5.65]	3.44	[3.06–3.81]
Acceptance of changes in payments—25 per cent decrease in payments	6.97	[6.78–7.16]	5.51	[5.31–5.71]	4.59	[4.39–4.79]
Acceptance of changes in payments—10 per cent decrease in payments	6.24	[6.13–6.34]	5.65	[5.55–5.76]	5.29	[5.18–5.4]
Acceptance of changes in payments—No Change in payments	5.75	[5.67–5.83]	5.75	[5.67–5.83]	5.75	[5.67–5.83]
Acceptance of changes in payments—10 per cent decrease in payments	5.26	[5.16–5.37]	5.85	[5.79–6.19]	6.21	[6.11–6.32]
Acceptance of changes in payments—25 per cent increase in payments	4.53	[4.34–4.72]	5.99	[5.85–6.61]	6.91	[6.71–7.11]
Acceptance of changes in payments—50 per cent increase in payments	3.31	[2.95–3.67]	6.23	[5.33–6.43]	8.06	[7.69–8.44]
Fairness of payments^‡	4.06	[3.89–4.23]	6.21	[6.03–6.38]	7.05	[6.87–7.22]
Intention to petition^‡	4.02	[3.83–4.21]	5.70	[5.51–5.89]	6.62	[6.43–6.81]
Intention to be supplied with produce^‡	5.22	[5.03–5.42]	7.28	[7.09–7.48]	8.51	[8.32–8.71]

Attribute	Farmer 1		Farmer 2		Farmer 3
Gender of farmer	Male		Male		Female
Experience of farmer	10 years		20 years		5 years
Formal qualification of farmer	No degree		Business degree		Agricultural degree
Farm size	Large		Moderate		Small
Production type	Conventional		Conventional		Organic
Efficiency of production	Below average		Average		Above average
Animal welfare/Product quality	Standard		Good		Exceptional
Conditions for biodiversity	Poor		Moderate		Good
Carbon footprint per farm	Among highest		Average		Among lowest
Carbon footprint per unit of output	High		Average		Low
Financial situation of farm	Making a profit		Coping		Not profitable
Predicted scores [95 per cent confidence interval^†]
Acceptance of changes in payments—50 per cent decrease in payments	8.19	[7.83–8.55]	5.27	[4.89–5.65]	3.44	[3.06–3.81]
Acceptance of changes in payments—25 per cent decrease in payments	6.97	[6.78–7.16]	5.51	[5.31–5.71]	4.59	[4.39–4.79]
Acceptance of changes in payments—10 per cent decrease in payments	6.24	[6.13–6.34]	5.65	[5.55–5.76]	5.29	[5.18–5.4]
Acceptance of changes in payments—No Change in payments	5.75	[5.67–5.83]	5.75	[5.67–5.83]	5.75	[5.67–5.83]
Acceptance of changes in payments—10 per cent decrease in payments	5.26	[5.16–5.37]	5.85	[5.79–6.19]	6.21	[6.11–6.32]
Acceptance of changes in payments—25 per cent increase in payments	4.53	[4.34–4.72]	5.99	[5.85–6.61]	6.91	[6.71–7.11]
Acceptance of changes in payments—50 per cent increase in payments	3.31	[2.95–3.67]	6.23	[5.33–6.43]	8.06	[7.69–8.44]
Fairness of payments^‡	4.06	[3.89–4.23]	6.21	[6.03–6.38]	7.05	[6.87–7.22]
Intention to petition^‡	4.02	[3.83–4.21]	5.70	[5.51–5.89]	6.62	[6.43–6.81]
Intention to be supplied with produce^‡	5.22	[5.03–5.42]	7.28	[7.09–7.48]	8.51	[8.32–8.71]

†

Based on the Delta method (Oehlert 1992).

^‡Level of payment change set to No Change (0 per cent); all estimates are significantly different from zero at the 1 per cent level.

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only