Table 3

Predicting bank failure with and without deposit flows.

Dependent variableFailed
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
ΔInterbank Deposits|$_{\text{April} \,31 \colon \text{July} \,31} $|-11.57**-11.10**-11.79*-11.46**
(5.51)(4.84)(6.19)(5.45)
ΔDeposits|$_{\text{April} \,31 \colon \text{July} \,31} $|-30.00-25.324.246.84
(27.16)(25.88)(32.48)(30.43)
Leverage0.010.17-0.02-0.010.230.18-0.020.23
(0.12)(0.18)(0.12)(0.12)(0.18)(0.18)(0.11)(0.18)
2nd Size quartile11.04-2.418.359.40-3.58-3.568.52-3.31
(8.65)(9.50)(8.26)(8.83)(8.90)(9.71)(8.17)(8.90)
3rd Size quartile-1.36-12.370.41-0.05-9.49-11.140.26-9.73
(6.75)(8.67)(6.86)(6.63)(8.07)(8.49)(6.84)(8.06)
4th Size quartile-4.90-6.03-0.31-3.46-1.04-5.00-0.43-1.15
(6.57)(8.61)(6.33)(6.37)(8.34)(8.60)(6.17)(8.31)
Foreign Funding0.95-2.48-7.34-3.02-10.55*-5.61-6.94-9.96
(3.52)(4.94)(5.34)(3.89)(6.34)(5.36)(4.71)(6.02)
Liquidity6.14-15.301.690.43-16.78-19.582.41-15.67
(11.57)(11.08)(10.68)(13.09)(11.01)(12.55)(13.25)(13.10)
Interbank4.3822.722.222.0223.0220.282.5223.69
(8.80)(19.02)(9.06)(8.19)(19.11)(18.43)(8.33)(18.70)
Nordwolle Connection17.6120.1319.0615.0219.6417.6819.4620.29
(15.32)(16.93)(15.31)(13.88)(16.20)(15.38)(14.78)(15.73)
Number of Banks118118118118118118118118
Bank-Type FENoYesNoNoYesYesNoYes
R2.073.17.15.083.24.17.15.24
main AUC0.5820.8100.7230.6140.8260.8120.7210.822
Dependent variableFailed
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
ΔInterbank Deposits|$_{\text{April} \,31 \colon \text{July} \,31} $|-11.57**-11.10**-11.79*-11.46**
(5.51)(4.84)(6.19)(5.45)
ΔDeposits|$_{\text{April} \,31 \colon \text{July} \,31} $|-30.00-25.324.246.84
(27.16)(25.88)(32.48)(30.43)
Leverage0.010.17-0.02-0.010.230.18-0.020.23
(0.12)(0.18)(0.12)(0.12)(0.18)(0.18)(0.11)(0.18)
2nd Size quartile11.04-2.418.359.40-3.58-3.568.52-3.31
(8.65)(9.50)(8.26)(8.83)(8.90)(9.71)(8.17)(8.90)
3rd Size quartile-1.36-12.370.41-0.05-9.49-11.140.26-9.73
(6.75)(8.67)(6.86)(6.63)(8.07)(8.49)(6.84)(8.06)
4th Size quartile-4.90-6.03-0.31-3.46-1.04-5.00-0.43-1.15
(6.57)(8.61)(6.33)(6.37)(8.34)(8.60)(6.17)(8.31)
Foreign Funding0.95-2.48-7.34-3.02-10.55*-5.61-6.94-9.96
(3.52)(4.94)(5.34)(3.89)(6.34)(5.36)(4.71)(6.02)
Liquidity6.14-15.301.690.43-16.78-19.582.41-15.67
(11.57)(11.08)(10.68)(13.09)(11.01)(12.55)(13.25)(13.10)
Interbank4.3822.722.222.0223.0220.282.5223.69
(8.80)(19.02)(9.06)(8.19)(19.11)(18.43)(8.33)(18.70)
Nordwolle Connection17.6120.1319.0615.0219.6417.6819.4620.29
(15.32)(16.93)(15.31)(13.88)(16.20)(15.38)(14.78)(15.73)
Number of Banks118118118118118118118118
Bank-Type FENoYesNoNoYesYesNoYes
R2.073.17.15.083.24.17.15.24
main AUC0.5820.8100.7230.6140.8260.8120.7210.822
This table reports result from estimating a regression of the following form:
where |$ \text{Failed}_{b} $| is, as before, a dummy that indicates whether bank b failed during or after the run. Our variables of interest are the changes in interbank deposits between April and July of 1931 as well as the changes in total deposit funding over the same period. |$ \gamma_{\theta} $| is a set of bank-type fixed effects and Xb is a set of bank-level characteristics in which we include a bank’s ratio of total liabilities (total assets net of equity) to equity, liquid assets (securities and interbank claims) to total deposits, interbank funding to total deposits, indicators of the size quartile based on total assets, an indicator for use of foreign-currency denominated deposits, and an indicator for whether a bank was connected to the nonfinancial firm “Nordwolle” that declared bankruptcy in June 1931. All control variables are calculated by averaging at the bank level from February through April 1931. Standard errors are in parentheses; *, **, and *** indicate significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level, respectively. The final row reports the area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC).
Table 3

Predicting bank failure with and without deposit flows.

Dependent variableFailed
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
ΔInterbank Deposits|$_{\text{April} \,31 \colon \text{July} \,31} $|-11.57**-11.10**-11.79*-11.46**
(5.51)(4.84)(6.19)(5.45)
ΔDeposits|$_{\text{April} \,31 \colon \text{July} \,31} $|-30.00-25.324.246.84
(27.16)(25.88)(32.48)(30.43)
Leverage0.010.17-0.02-0.010.230.18-0.020.23
(0.12)(0.18)(0.12)(0.12)(0.18)(0.18)(0.11)(0.18)
2nd Size quartile11.04-2.418.359.40-3.58-3.568.52-3.31
(8.65)(9.50)(8.26)(8.83)(8.90)(9.71)(8.17)(8.90)
3rd Size quartile-1.36-12.370.41-0.05-9.49-11.140.26-9.73
(6.75)(8.67)(6.86)(6.63)(8.07)(8.49)(6.84)(8.06)
4th Size quartile-4.90-6.03-0.31-3.46-1.04-5.00-0.43-1.15
(6.57)(8.61)(6.33)(6.37)(8.34)(8.60)(6.17)(8.31)
Foreign Funding0.95-2.48-7.34-3.02-10.55*-5.61-6.94-9.96
(3.52)(4.94)(5.34)(3.89)(6.34)(5.36)(4.71)(6.02)
Liquidity6.14-15.301.690.43-16.78-19.582.41-15.67
(11.57)(11.08)(10.68)(13.09)(11.01)(12.55)(13.25)(13.10)
Interbank4.3822.722.222.0223.0220.282.5223.69
(8.80)(19.02)(9.06)(8.19)(19.11)(18.43)(8.33)(18.70)
Nordwolle Connection17.6120.1319.0615.0219.6417.6819.4620.29
(15.32)(16.93)(15.31)(13.88)(16.20)(15.38)(14.78)(15.73)
Number of Banks118118118118118118118118
Bank-Type FENoYesNoNoYesYesNoYes
R2.073.17.15.083.24.17.15.24
main AUC0.5820.8100.7230.6140.8260.8120.7210.822
Dependent variableFailed
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
ΔInterbank Deposits|$_{\text{April} \,31 \colon \text{July} \,31} $|-11.57**-11.10**-11.79*-11.46**
(5.51)(4.84)(6.19)(5.45)
ΔDeposits|$_{\text{April} \,31 \colon \text{July} \,31} $|-30.00-25.324.246.84
(27.16)(25.88)(32.48)(30.43)
Leverage0.010.17-0.02-0.010.230.18-0.020.23
(0.12)(0.18)(0.12)(0.12)(0.18)(0.18)(0.11)(0.18)
2nd Size quartile11.04-2.418.359.40-3.58-3.568.52-3.31
(8.65)(9.50)(8.26)(8.83)(8.90)(9.71)(8.17)(8.90)
3rd Size quartile-1.36-12.370.41-0.05-9.49-11.140.26-9.73
(6.75)(8.67)(6.86)(6.63)(8.07)(8.49)(6.84)(8.06)
4th Size quartile-4.90-6.03-0.31-3.46-1.04-5.00-0.43-1.15
(6.57)(8.61)(6.33)(6.37)(8.34)(8.60)(6.17)(8.31)
Foreign Funding0.95-2.48-7.34-3.02-10.55*-5.61-6.94-9.96
(3.52)(4.94)(5.34)(3.89)(6.34)(5.36)(4.71)(6.02)
Liquidity6.14-15.301.690.43-16.78-19.582.41-15.67
(11.57)(11.08)(10.68)(13.09)(11.01)(12.55)(13.25)(13.10)
Interbank4.3822.722.222.0223.0220.282.5223.69
(8.80)(19.02)(9.06)(8.19)(19.11)(18.43)(8.33)(18.70)
Nordwolle Connection17.6120.1319.0615.0219.6417.6819.4620.29
(15.32)(16.93)(15.31)(13.88)(16.20)(15.38)(14.78)(15.73)
Number of Banks118118118118118118118118
Bank-Type FENoYesNoNoYesYesNoYes
R2.073.17.15.083.24.17.15.24
main AUC0.5820.8100.7230.6140.8260.8120.7210.822
This table reports result from estimating a regression of the following form:
where |$ \text{Failed}_{b} $| is, as before, a dummy that indicates whether bank b failed during or after the run. Our variables of interest are the changes in interbank deposits between April and July of 1931 as well as the changes in total deposit funding over the same period. |$ \gamma_{\theta} $| is a set of bank-type fixed effects and Xb is a set of bank-level characteristics in which we include a bank’s ratio of total liabilities (total assets net of equity) to equity, liquid assets (securities and interbank claims) to total deposits, interbank funding to total deposits, indicators of the size quartile based on total assets, an indicator for use of foreign-currency denominated deposits, and an indicator for whether a bank was connected to the nonfinancial firm “Nordwolle” that declared bankruptcy in June 1931. All control variables are calculated by averaging at the bank level from February through April 1931. Standard errors are in parentheses; *, **, and *** indicate significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level, respectively. The final row reports the area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC).
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close