Table 1.

Indigenous groups in which pollution impacts have been most extensively documenteda

RankGroupGeographic areaDocumented evidence
Number of studies% of totalCumulative %
1InuitCanada, Greenland, USA318.18%8.18%
2CreeCanada, USA236.07%14.25%
3OjibweCanada, USA215.54%19.79%
4DeneCanada205.28%25.07%
5MétisCanada, USA153.96%29.02%
6MohawkCanada, USA133.43%32.45%
7AchuarEcuador, Peru102.64%35.09%
8OgoniNigeria102.64%37.73%
9QuechuaArgentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru92.37%40.11%
10DayakIndonesia, Malaysia82.11%42.22%
11SaamiFinland, Norway, Rusasia, Sweden71.85%44.06%
12MayaBelize, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico71.85%45.91%
13NavajoUSA71.85%47.76%
14KichwaColombia, Ecuador, Peru61.58%49.34%
15AymaraArgentina, Bolivia, Chile, Peru51.32%50.66%
16MapucheArgentina, Chile41.06%51.72%
17SiouxCanada, USA41.06%52.77%
18UrarinaPeru41.06%53.83%
19YupikRussia, USA41.06%54.88%
20WayuuColombia, Venezuela41.06%55.94%
RankGroupGeographic areaDocumented evidence
Number of studies% of totalCumulative %
1InuitCanada, Greenland, USA318.18%8.18%
2CreeCanada, USA236.07%14.25%
3OjibweCanada, USA215.54%19.79%
4DeneCanada205.28%25.07%
5MétisCanada, USA153.96%29.02%
6MohawkCanada, USA133.43%32.45%
7AchuarEcuador, Peru102.64%35.09%
8OgoniNigeria102.64%37.73%
9QuechuaArgentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru92.37%40.11%
10DayakIndonesia, Malaysia82.11%42.22%
11SaamiFinland, Norway, Rusasia, Sweden71.85%44.06%
12MayaBelize, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico71.85%45.91%
13NavajoUSA71.85%47.76%
14KichwaColombia, Ecuador, Peru61.58%49.34%
15AymaraArgentina, Bolivia, Chile, Peru51.32%50.66%
16MapucheArgentina, Chile41.06%51.72%
17SiouxCanada, USA41.06%52.77%
18UrarinaPeru41.06%53.83%
19YupikRussia, USA41.06%54.88%
20WayuuColombia, Venezuela41.06%55.94%
a

Both percentages refer to the total number of studies identified in the literature review.

Table 1.

Indigenous groups in which pollution impacts have been most extensively documenteda

RankGroupGeographic areaDocumented evidence
Number of studies% of totalCumulative %
1InuitCanada, Greenland, USA318.18%8.18%
2CreeCanada, USA236.07%14.25%
3OjibweCanada, USA215.54%19.79%
4DeneCanada205.28%25.07%
5MétisCanada, USA153.96%29.02%
6MohawkCanada, USA133.43%32.45%
7AchuarEcuador, Peru102.64%35.09%
8OgoniNigeria102.64%37.73%
9QuechuaArgentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru92.37%40.11%
10DayakIndonesia, Malaysia82.11%42.22%
11SaamiFinland, Norway, Rusasia, Sweden71.85%44.06%
12MayaBelize, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico71.85%45.91%
13NavajoUSA71.85%47.76%
14KichwaColombia, Ecuador, Peru61.58%49.34%
15AymaraArgentina, Bolivia, Chile, Peru51.32%50.66%
16MapucheArgentina, Chile41.06%51.72%
17SiouxCanada, USA41.06%52.77%
18UrarinaPeru41.06%53.83%
19YupikRussia, USA41.06%54.88%
20WayuuColombia, Venezuela41.06%55.94%
RankGroupGeographic areaDocumented evidence
Number of studies% of totalCumulative %
1InuitCanada, Greenland, USA318.18%8.18%
2CreeCanada, USA236.07%14.25%
3OjibweCanada, USA215.54%19.79%
4DeneCanada205.28%25.07%
5MétisCanada, USA153.96%29.02%
6MohawkCanada, USA133.43%32.45%
7AchuarEcuador, Peru102.64%35.09%
8OgoniNigeria102.64%37.73%
9QuechuaArgentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru92.37%40.11%
10DayakIndonesia, Malaysia82.11%42.22%
11SaamiFinland, Norway, Rusasia, Sweden71.85%44.06%
12MayaBelize, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico71.85%45.91%
13NavajoUSA71.85%47.76%
14KichwaColombia, Ecuador, Peru61.58%49.34%
15AymaraArgentina, Bolivia, Chile, Peru51.32%50.66%
16MapucheArgentina, Chile41.06%51.72%
17SiouxCanada, USA41.06%52.77%
18UrarinaPeru41.06%53.83%
19YupikRussia, USA41.06%54.88%
20WayuuColombia, Venezuela41.06%55.94%
a

Both percentages refer to the total number of studies identified in the literature review.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close