Table 1.

Simulation study: bias and standard error (SE) based on 200 Monte Carlo replicates analyzed with an unadjusted model and the proposed joint propensity score approach with 100 bootstrap samples.

UnadjustedJoint propensity
Interventional unit
Outcome unit
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
BiasBiasEmpirical SEAvg. SE95% coverageAvg. SE95% coverage
|$\tau$|0.450.050.100.150.990.0280.320
|$\Delta(0)$|−0.60−0.010.611.161.000.1680.385
|$\Delta(1)$|−0.60−0.010.611.171.000.1690.385
UnadjustedJoint propensity
Interventional unit
Outcome unit
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
BiasBiasEmpirical SEAvg. SE95% coverageAvg. SE95% coverage
|$\tau$|0.450.050.100.150.990.0280.320
|$\Delta(0)$|−0.60−0.010.611.161.000.1680.385
|$\Delta(1)$|−0.60−0.010.611.171.000.1690.385
Table 1.

Simulation study: bias and standard error (SE) based on 200 Monte Carlo replicates analyzed with an unadjusted model and the proposed joint propensity score approach with 100 bootstrap samples.

UnadjustedJoint propensity
Interventional unit
Outcome unit
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
BiasBiasEmpirical SEAvg. SE95% coverageAvg. SE95% coverage
|$\tau$|0.450.050.100.150.990.0280.320
|$\Delta(0)$|−0.60−0.010.611.161.000.1680.385
|$\Delta(1)$|−0.60−0.010.611.171.000.1690.385
UnadjustedJoint propensity
Interventional unit
Outcome unit
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
BiasBiasEmpirical SEAvg. SE95% coverageAvg. SE95% coverage
|$\tau$|0.450.050.100.150.990.0280.320
|$\Delta(0)$|−0.60−0.010.611.161.000.1680.385
|$\Delta(1)$|−0.60−0.010.611.171.000.1690.385
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close