Table 2.

Effect of the Child Labor Ban: Placebo, Constitution Amendment, and Labor Law Reform

 IIIIII
A. School enrollment
Treat cohort 1998 × placebo ban 20130.010
(0.007)
Treat cohort 1999 × constitutional amendment 20140.019**
(0.007)
Treat cohort 2000 × labor law 20150.022***
(0.004)
Observations80,976105,554123,487
B. Employment
Treat cohort 1998 × placebo ban 2013−0.001
(0.006)
Treat cohort 1999 × constitutional amendment 2014−0.004
(0.004)
Treat cohort 2000 × labor law 2015−0.012**
(0.005)
Observations80,976105,554123,487
 IIIIII
A. School enrollment
Treat cohort 1998 × placebo ban 20130.010
(0.007)
Treat cohort 1999 × constitutional amendment 20140.019**
(0.007)
Treat cohort 2000 × labor law 20150.022***
(0.004)
Observations80,976105,554123,487
B. Employment
Treat cohort 1998 × placebo ban 2013−0.001
(0.006)
Treat cohort 1999 × constitutional amendment 2014−0.004
(0.004)
Treat cohort 2000 × labor law 2015−0.012**
(0.005)
Observations80,976105,554123,487

Source: Mexican National Survey on Occupation and Employment (ENOE), authors’ analysis.

Note: Results are obtained from DiD models. The regressions include the full set of controls, state fixed effects, quarter-by-year fixed effects, and state-specific time trend. Standard errors in parentheses (clustered at the birth-month-survey year). ***p < 0.01; **p < 0.05; *p < 0.1.

Table 2.

Effect of the Child Labor Ban: Placebo, Constitution Amendment, and Labor Law Reform

 IIIIII
A. School enrollment
Treat cohort 1998 × placebo ban 20130.010
(0.007)
Treat cohort 1999 × constitutional amendment 20140.019**
(0.007)
Treat cohort 2000 × labor law 20150.022***
(0.004)
Observations80,976105,554123,487
B. Employment
Treat cohort 1998 × placebo ban 2013−0.001
(0.006)
Treat cohort 1999 × constitutional amendment 2014−0.004
(0.004)
Treat cohort 2000 × labor law 2015−0.012**
(0.005)
Observations80,976105,554123,487
 IIIIII
A. School enrollment
Treat cohort 1998 × placebo ban 20130.010
(0.007)
Treat cohort 1999 × constitutional amendment 20140.019**
(0.007)
Treat cohort 2000 × labor law 20150.022***
(0.004)
Observations80,976105,554123,487
B. Employment
Treat cohort 1998 × placebo ban 2013−0.001
(0.006)
Treat cohort 1999 × constitutional amendment 2014−0.004
(0.004)
Treat cohort 2000 × labor law 2015−0.012**
(0.005)
Observations80,976105,554123,487

Source: Mexican National Survey on Occupation and Employment (ENOE), authors’ analysis.

Note: Results are obtained from DiD models. The regressions include the full set of controls, state fixed effects, quarter-by-year fixed effects, and state-specific time trend. Standard errors in parentheses (clustered at the birth-month-survey year). ***p < 0.01; **p < 0.05; *p < 0.1.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close