Table 5.

Meta-regression Analysis for Confounding Variables in the Relationship Between the C-Allele Carriers of the MC4R rs17782313 and Energy Intake

CoefficientP95% CI
Sample size−0.068.336−0.2200.084
Year of publication (>2018)0.337.153−0.1520.827
Sex (females)0.366.343−0.4611.192
Type of population (overweight and/or obesity)−0.275.439−1.0450.494
Origin (European)0.156.200−0.0990.412
Quality (fair)0.195.371−0.2740.665
CoefficientP95% CI
Sample size−0.068.336−0.2200.084
Year of publication (>2018)0.337.153−0.1520.827
Sex (females)0.366.343−0.4611.192
Type of population (overweight and/or obesity)−0.275.439−1.0450.494
Origin (European)0.156.200−0.0990.412
Quality (fair)0.195.371−0.2740.665
Table 5.

Meta-regression Analysis for Confounding Variables in the Relationship Between the C-Allele Carriers of the MC4R rs17782313 and Energy Intake

CoefficientP95% CI
Sample size−0.068.336−0.2200.084
Year of publication (>2018)0.337.153−0.1520.827
Sex (females)0.366.343−0.4611.192
Type of population (overweight and/or obesity)−0.275.439−1.0450.494
Origin (European)0.156.200−0.0990.412
Quality (fair)0.195.371−0.2740.665
CoefficientP95% CI
Sample size−0.068.336−0.2200.084
Year of publication (>2018)0.337.153−0.1520.827
Sex (females)0.366.343−0.4611.192
Type of population (overweight and/or obesity)−0.275.439−1.0450.494
Origin (European)0.156.200−0.0990.412
Quality (fair)0.195.371−0.2740.665
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close