Table 2 Open in new tab Calculated RRTD...

Comparison→	Fibrosis/remote	Inflammation/remote	Fibrosis/inflammation	Remote/control
3D T₁	0.37	^a	^a	0.68
3D T_1ρ	1.7	0.63	0.67	0.032
2D T_1ρ	1.1	0.55	0.35	0.21
2D T₂	^a	0.99	^a	−0.025

Comparison→	Fibrosis/remote	Inflammation/remote	Fibrosis/inflammation	Remote/control
3D T₁	0.37	^a	^a	0.68
3D T_1ρ	1.7	0.63	0.67	0.032
2D T_1ρ	1.1	0.55	0.35	0.21
2D T₂	^a	0.99	^a	−0.025

Table 2

Calculated RRTD values

Comparison→	Fibrosis/remote	Inflammation/remote	Fibrosis/inflammation	Remote/control
contrast↓
3D T₁	0.37	^a	^a	0.68
3D T_1ρ	1.7	0.63	0.67	0.032
2D T_1ρ	1.1	0.55	0.35	0.21
2D T₂	^a	0.99	^a	−0.025

Comparison→	Fibrosis/remote	Inflammation/remote	Fibrosis/inflammation	Remote/control
contrast↓
3D T₁	0.37	^a	^a	0.68
3D T_1ρ	1.7	0.63	0.67	0.032
2D T_1ρ	1.1	0.55	0.35	0.21
2D T₂	^a	0.99	^a	−0.025

The contrast differences in various imaging techniques (3D T₁, 3D T_1ρ, 2D T_1ρ, and 2D T₂) when comparing different ROIs by calculating RRTD values. The values highlight the sensitivity of each technique in differentiating between ROIs, with higher values indicating greater contrast and, consequently, better differentiation.

^aNot investigated.

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only