Table 7

Out-of-sample return forecasting ability of implied moments after stabilization

Panel A. With versus without stabilization
ROS2
Rolling window length (months)No stabilization0% stabilization25% stabilization50% stabilization75% stabilization100% stabilization
50.00−0.370.300.270.27−0.25
100.00−0.370.430.540.520.14
150.00−0.240.380.620.670.42
200.00−0.130.320.430.440.25
250.00−0.070.370.450.460.29
300.000.201.011.020.970.57
350.000.130.850.900.880.60
400.000.180.840.910.900.64
450.000.140.640.710.700.51
500.000.160.600.710.770.60
550.000.07−0.07−0.26−0.46−1.05
600.000.02−0.08−0.27−0.49−1.02
Panel A. With versus without stabilization
ROS2
Rolling window length (months)No stabilization0% stabilization25% stabilization50% stabilization75% stabilization100% stabilization
50.00−0.370.300.270.27−0.25
100.00−0.370.430.540.520.14
150.00−0.240.380.620.670.42
200.00−0.130.320.430.440.25
250.00−0.070.370.450.460.29
300.000.201.011.020.970.57
350.000.130.850.900.880.60
400.000.180.840.910.900.64
450.000.140.640.710.700.51
500.000.160.600.710.770.60
550.000.07−0.07−0.26−0.46−1.05
600.000.02−0.08−0.27−0.49−1.02
Panel B. Model versus historical mean
ROS2
Rolling window length (months)No stabilization0% stabilization25% stabilization50% stabilization75% stabilization100% stabilization
5−7.42−7.79−7.12−7.15−7.15−7.67
10−2.33−2.70−1.90−1.79−1.81−2.20
150.18−0.050.560.800.850.61
200.940.811.261.371.381.19
251.081.011.451.531.541.37
301.541.742.552.562.512.11
352.002.132.842.902.882.59
402.332.513.183.253.232.98
452.612.753.253.323.313.12
503.083.243.683.793.853.68
55−4.37−4.30−4.44−4.63−4.83−5.42
60−7.38−7.36−7.46−7.65−7.86−8.40
Panel B. Model versus historical mean
ROS2
Rolling window length (months)No stabilization0% stabilization25% stabilization50% stabilization75% stabilization100% stabilization
5−7.42−7.79−7.12−7.15−7.15−7.67
10−2.33−2.70−1.90−1.79−1.81−2.20
150.18−0.050.560.800.850.61
200.940.811.261.371.381.19
251.081.011.451.531.541.37
301.541.742.552.562.512.11
352.002.132.842.902.882.59
402.332.513.183.253.232.98
452.612.753.253.323.313.12
503.083.243.683.793.853.68
55−4.37−4.30−4.44−4.63−4.83−5.42
60−7.38−7.36−7.46−7.65−7.86−8.40

Notes: This table presents the results of the out-of-sample return forecasting ability test. Following Campbell and Thompson (2008), we report the ROS2 statistic, which is defined as ROS2=1-t=1Trt-rt^2/t=1Trt-rt¯2, where rt^ is the fitted value derived from a predictive regression estimated through the rolling window that ends at time t1, and rt¯ is the benchmark value for the rolling window. Benchmark value is defined as the fitted value estimated without stabilization for Panel A, and the historical mean log-return for Panel B. A positive value of ROS2 indicates that the predictive regression produces a lower mean squared prediction error than the benchmark value. The value of ROS2 is expressed as a percentage.

Table 7

Out-of-sample return forecasting ability of implied moments after stabilization

Panel A. With versus without stabilization
ROS2
Rolling window length (months)No stabilization0% stabilization25% stabilization50% stabilization75% stabilization100% stabilization
50.00−0.370.300.270.27−0.25
100.00−0.370.430.540.520.14
150.00−0.240.380.620.670.42
200.00−0.130.320.430.440.25
250.00−0.070.370.450.460.29
300.000.201.011.020.970.57
350.000.130.850.900.880.60
400.000.180.840.910.900.64
450.000.140.640.710.700.51
500.000.160.600.710.770.60
550.000.07−0.07−0.26−0.46−1.05
600.000.02−0.08−0.27−0.49−1.02
Panel A. With versus without stabilization
ROS2
Rolling window length (months)No stabilization0% stabilization25% stabilization50% stabilization75% stabilization100% stabilization
50.00−0.370.300.270.27−0.25
100.00−0.370.430.540.520.14
150.00−0.240.380.620.670.42
200.00−0.130.320.430.440.25
250.00−0.070.370.450.460.29
300.000.201.011.020.970.57
350.000.130.850.900.880.60
400.000.180.840.910.900.64
450.000.140.640.710.700.51
500.000.160.600.710.770.60
550.000.07−0.07−0.26−0.46−1.05
600.000.02−0.08−0.27−0.49−1.02
Panel B. Model versus historical mean
ROS2
Rolling window length (months)No stabilization0% stabilization25% stabilization50% stabilization75% stabilization100% stabilization
5−7.42−7.79−7.12−7.15−7.15−7.67
10−2.33−2.70−1.90−1.79−1.81−2.20
150.18−0.050.560.800.850.61
200.940.811.261.371.381.19
251.081.011.451.531.541.37
301.541.742.552.562.512.11
352.002.132.842.902.882.59
402.332.513.183.253.232.98
452.612.753.253.323.313.12
503.083.243.683.793.853.68
55−4.37−4.30−4.44−4.63−4.83−5.42
60−7.38−7.36−7.46−7.65−7.86−8.40
Panel B. Model versus historical mean
ROS2
Rolling window length (months)No stabilization0% stabilization25% stabilization50% stabilization75% stabilization100% stabilization
5−7.42−7.79−7.12−7.15−7.15−7.67
10−2.33−2.70−1.90−1.79−1.81−2.20
150.18−0.050.560.800.850.61
200.940.811.261.371.381.19
251.081.011.451.531.541.37
301.541.742.552.562.512.11
352.002.132.842.902.882.59
402.332.513.183.253.232.98
452.612.753.253.323.313.12
503.083.243.683.793.853.68
55−4.37−4.30−4.44−4.63−4.83−5.42
60−7.38−7.36−7.46−7.65−7.86−8.40

Notes: This table presents the results of the out-of-sample return forecasting ability test. Following Campbell and Thompson (2008), we report the ROS2 statistic, which is defined as ROS2=1-t=1Trt-rt^2/t=1Trt-rt¯2, where rt^ is the fitted value derived from a predictive regression estimated through the rolling window that ends at time t1, and rt¯ is the benchmark value for the rolling window. Benchmark value is defined as the fitted value estimated without stabilization for Panel A, and the historical mean log-return for Panel B. A positive value of ROS2 indicates that the predictive regression produces a lower mean squared prediction error than the benchmark value. The value of ROS2 is expressed as a percentage.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close