Table 8

In-sample return predictive ability of implied moments after alternative treatments

Panel A. Full extrapolation (FE)
FE with 0% stabilizationFE with 25% stabilizationFE with 50% stabilizationFE with 75% stabilizationFE with 100% stabilization
r(t−1)−0.040−0.028−0.008−0.0120.012
(−0.37)(−0.26)(−0.07)(−0.11)(0.11)
ΔVOL(t−1)4.9955.4956.1676.1156.968*
(1.36)(1.47)(1.58)(1.59)(1.71)
ΔSKEW(t−1)0.443**0.664***0.937**0.782**0.831*
(2.38)(2.62)(2.03)(1.99)(1.77)
ΔKURT(t−1)0.0200.066**0.0860.0640.093
(1.46)(1.96)(1.32)(1.13)(0.76)
Intercept0.059*0.059*0.058*0.058*0.056*
(1.85)(1.82)(1.78)(1.79)(1.74)
# of obs.1,5261,5261,5261,5261,526
R20.04300.04440.04600.04670.0482
Panel A. Full extrapolation (FE)
FE with 0% stabilizationFE with 25% stabilizationFE with 50% stabilizationFE with 75% stabilizationFE with 100% stabilization
r(t−1)−0.040−0.028−0.008−0.0120.012
(−0.37)(−0.26)(−0.07)(−0.11)(0.11)
ΔVOL(t−1)4.9955.4956.1676.1156.968*
(1.36)(1.47)(1.58)(1.59)(1.71)
ΔSKEW(t−1)0.443**0.664***0.937**0.782**0.831*
(2.38)(2.62)(2.03)(1.99)(1.77)
ΔKURT(t−1)0.0200.066**0.0860.0640.093
(1.46)(1.96)(1.32)(1.13)(0.76)
Intercept0.059*0.059*0.058*0.058*0.056*
(1.85)(1.82)(1.78)(1.79)(1.74)
# of obs.1,5261,5261,5261,5261,526
R20.04300.04440.04600.04670.0482
Panel B. Domain reduction (DRed) and symmetrization (DSym)
25% DRed50% DRed75% DRedDSym (d1)DSym (strike price)
r(t−1)−0.042−0.051−0.080−0.0010.024
(−0.38)(−0.47)(−0.73)(0.02)(0.21)
ΔVOL(t−1)4.9724.6673.5926.7457.848*
(1.31)(1.21)(0.92)(1.53)(1.78)
ΔSKEW(t−1)0.471**0.481***0.504**1.629***1.600***
(2.26)(2.30)(2.39)(2.65)(2.83)
ΔKURT(t−1)0.0250.0270.0320.0720.031
(1.37)(1.41)(1.52)(0.91)(0.41)
Intercept0.060*0.060*0.062**0.057*0.056*
(1.85)(1.86)(1.91)(1.78)(1.74)
# of obs.1,5261,5261,5261,5261,526
R20.04220.04130.03930.05190.0561
Panel B. Domain reduction (DRed) and symmetrization (DSym)
25% DRed50% DRed75% DRedDSym (d1)DSym (strike price)
r(t−1)−0.042−0.051−0.080−0.0010.024
(−0.38)(−0.47)(−0.73)(0.02)(0.21)
ΔVOL(t−1)4.9724.6673.5926.7457.848*
(1.31)(1.21)(0.92)(1.53)(1.78)
ΔSKEW(t−1)0.471**0.481***0.504**1.629***1.600***
(2.26)(2.30)(2.39)(2.65)(2.83)
ΔKURT(t−1)0.0250.0270.0320.0720.031
(1.37)(1.41)(1.52)(0.91)(0.41)
Intercept0.060*0.060*0.062**0.057*0.056*
(1.85)(1.86)(1.91)(1.78)(1.74)
# of obs.1,5261,5261,5261,5261,526
R20.04220.04130.03930.05190.0561

Notes: This table presents the results of in-sample return prediction tests conducted under alternative integration domain treatments. Panel A reports the test results where flat extrapolation is applied up to strike prices equivalent to one-third and three times the underlying price. Panel B presents the test results where domain reduction and symmetrization are applied as truncation treatments. The dependent variable, r(t), represents the S&P 500 index log-return on day t, expressed as a percentage. ΔVOL(t), ΔSKEW(t), and ΔKURT(t) denote the daily first-order differences of implied volatility, skewness, and kurtosis estimates on day t, respectively. The Huber–White sandwich estimator is used to estimate standard errors; therefore, the unadjusted R2 is reported. t-statistics are presented in parentheses. ***, **, and * indicate statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively.

Table 8

In-sample return predictive ability of implied moments after alternative treatments

Panel A. Full extrapolation (FE)
FE with 0% stabilizationFE with 25% stabilizationFE with 50% stabilizationFE with 75% stabilizationFE with 100% stabilization
r(t−1)−0.040−0.028−0.008−0.0120.012
(−0.37)(−0.26)(−0.07)(−0.11)(0.11)
ΔVOL(t−1)4.9955.4956.1676.1156.968*
(1.36)(1.47)(1.58)(1.59)(1.71)
ΔSKEW(t−1)0.443**0.664***0.937**0.782**0.831*
(2.38)(2.62)(2.03)(1.99)(1.77)
ΔKURT(t−1)0.0200.066**0.0860.0640.093
(1.46)(1.96)(1.32)(1.13)(0.76)
Intercept0.059*0.059*0.058*0.058*0.056*
(1.85)(1.82)(1.78)(1.79)(1.74)
# of obs.1,5261,5261,5261,5261,526
R20.04300.04440.04600.04670.0482
Panel A. Full extrapolation (FE)
FE with 0% stabilizationFE with 25% stabilizationFE with 50% stabilizationFE with 75% stabilizationFE with 100% stabilization
r(t−1)−0.040−0.028−0.008−0.0120.012
(−0.37)(−0.26)(−0.07)(−0.11)(0.11)
ΔVOL(t−1)4.9955.4956.1676.1156.968*
(1.36)(1.47)(1.58)(1.59)(1.71)
ΔSKEW(t−1)0.443**0.664***0.937**0.782**0.831*
(2.38)(2.62)(2.03)(1.99)(1.77)
ΔKURT(t−1)0.0200.066**0.0860.0640.093
(1.46)(1.96)(1.32)(1.13)(0.76)
Intercept0.059*0.059*0.058*0.058*0.056*
(1.85)(1.82)(1.78)(1.79)(1.74)
# of obs.1,5261,5261,5261,5261,526
R20.04300.04440.04600.04670.0482
Panel B. Domain reduction (DRed) and symmetrization (DSym)
25% DRed50% DRed75% DRedDSym (d1)DSym (strike price)
r(t−1)−0.042−0.051−0.080−0.0010.024
(−0.38)(−0.47)(−0.73)(0.02)(0.21)
ΔVOL(t−1)4.9724.6673.5926.7457.848*
(1.31)(1.21)(0.92)(1.53)(1.78)
ΔSKEW(t−1)0.471**0.481***0.504**1.629***1.600***
(2.26)(2.30)(2.39)(2.65)(2.83)
ΔKURT(t−1)0.0250.0270.0320.0720.031
(1.37)(1.41)(1.52)(0.91)(0.41)
Intercept0.060*0.060*0.062**0.057*0.056*
(1.85)(1.86)(1.91)(1.78)(1.74)
# of obs.1,5261,5261,5261,5261,526
R20.04220.04130.03930.05190.0561
Panel B. Domain reduction (DRed) and symmetrization (DSym)
25% DRed50% DRed75% DRedDSym (d1)DSym (strike price)
r(t−1)−0.042−0.051−0.080−0.0010.024
(−0.38)(−0.47)(−0.73)(0.02)(0.21)
ΔVOL(t−1)4.9724.6673.5926.7457.848*
(1.31)(1.21)(0.92)(1.53)(1.78)
ΔSKEW(t−1)0.471**0.481***0.504**1.629***1.600***
(2.26)(2.30)(2.39)(2.65)(2.83)
ΔKURT(t−1)0.0250.0270.0320.0720.031
(1.37)(1.41)(1.52)(0.91)(0.41)
Intercept0.060*0.060*0.062**0.057*0.056*
(1.85)(1.86)(1.91)(1.78)(1.74)
# of obs.1,5261,5261,5261,5261,526
R20.04220.04130.03930.05190.0561

Notes: This table presents the results of in-sample return prediction tests conducted under alternative integration domain treatments. Panel A reports the test results where flat extrapolation is applied up to strike prices equivalent to one-third and three times the underlying price. Panel B presents the test results where domain reduction and symmetrization are applied as truncation treatments. The dependent variable, r(t), represents the S&P 500 index log-return on day t, expressed as a percentage. ΔVOL(t), ΔSKEW(t), and ΔKURT(t) denote the daily first-order differences of implied volatility, skewness, and kurtosis estimates on day t, respectively. The Huber–White sandwich estimator is used to estimate standard errors; therefore, the unadjusted R2 is reported. t-statistics are presented in parentheses. ***, **, and * indicate statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close