Table 10

Performance comparison, monthly frequency: long training, rank transformation

Panel A: one-month horizon
Roos2×100Std Devp-val.SR
Theory-basedMW0.23.20.1540.30
KT−1.86.90.7040.30
Machine learningENet0.53.50.0730.65
ANN0.43.40.0530.34
GBRT−0.84.30.3000.37
RF−0.84.80.2940.17
Ens0.13.80.1080.41
Panel A: one-month horizon
Roos2×100Std Devp-val.SR
Theory-basedMW0.23.20.1540.30
KT−1.86.90.7040.30
Machine learningENet0.53.50.0730.65
ANN0.43.40.0530.34
GBRT−0.84.30.3000.37
RF−0.84.80.2940.17
Ens0.13.80.1080.41
Panel B: one-year horizon
Roos2×100Std Devp-val.SR
Theory-basedMW8.816.30.0510.37
KT3.147.60.6940.37
Machine learningENet6.922.50.1740.49
ANN8.122.10.0970.63
GBRT9.723.10.0860.49
RF9.643.30.3610.67
Ens10.224.80.0860.60
Panel B: one-year horizon
Roos2×100Std Devp-val.SR
Theory-basedMW8.816.30.0510.37
KT3.147.60.6940.37
Machine learningENet6.922.50.1740.49
ANN8.122.10.0970.63
GBRT9.723.10.0860.49
RF9.643.30.3610.67
Ens10.224.80.0860.60

Notes: This table reports predictive R2, their standard deviation and statistical significance, and the annualized Sharpe ratios (SR) implied by Martin and Wagner’s (2019) and Kadan and Tang’s (2020) theory-based approaches and the five machine learning models. The standard deviation of the Roos,s2×100 (Std Dev) is calculated based on the annual test samples. The SR refer to a zero-investment strategy long in the portfolio of stocks with the highest excess return prediction and short in the portfolio of stocks with the lowest excess return prediction. The p-values are associated with a test of the null hypothesis that the respective excess return prediction has no explanatory power over the zero forecast, E(Roos,s2)0. For Panel A, the investment horizon is one month, and for Panel B, it is one year. The RPE are computed at the monthly (EOM) frequency. The out-of-sample testing period starts in January 1996 and ends in November 2018 (Panel A) or December 2017 (Panel B), respectively. The features are rank-scaled as described in Section 3.6. The machine learning results are obtained using the long training scheme depicted in Figure 2.

Table 10

Performance comparison, monthly frequency: long training, rank transformation

Panel A: one-month horizon
Roos2×100Std Devp-val.SR
Theory-basedMW0.23.20.1540.30
KT−1.86.90.7040.30
Machine learningENet0.53.50.0730.65
ANN0.43.40.0530.34
GBRT−0.84.30.3000.37
RF−0.84.80.2940.17
Ens0.13.80.1080.41
Panel A: one-month horizon
Roos2×100Std Devp-val.SR
Theory-basedMW0.23.20.1540.30
KT−1.86.90.7040.30
Machine learningENet0.53.50.0730.65
ANN0.43.40.0530.34
GBRT−0.84.30.3000.37
RF−0.84.80.2940.17
Ens0.13.80.1080.41
Panel B: one-year horizon
Roos2×100Std Devp-val.SR
Theory-basedMW8.816.30.0510.37
KT3.147.60.6940.37
Machine learningENet6.922.50.1740.49
ANN8.122.10.0970.63
GBRT9.723.10.0860.49
RF9.643.30.3610.67
Ens10.224.80.0860.60
Panel B: one-year horizon
Roos2×100Std Devp-val.SR
Theory-basedMW8.816.30.0510.37
KT3.147.60.6940.37
Machine learningENet6.922.50.1740.49
ANN8.122.10.0970.63
GBRT9.723.10.0860.49
RF9.643.30.3610.67
Ens10.224.80.0860.60

Notes: This table reports predictive R2, their standard deviation and statistical significance, and the annualized Sharpe ratios (SR) implied by Martin and Wagner’s (2019) and Kadan and Tang’s (2020) theory-based approaches and the five machine learning models. The standard deviation of the Roos,s2×100 (Std Dev) is calculated based on the annual test samples. The SR refer to a zero-investment strategy long in the portfolio of stocks with the highest excess return prediction and short in the portfolio of stocks with the lowest excess return prediction. The p-values are associated with a test of the null hypothesis that the respective excess return prediction has no explanatory power over the zero forecast, E(Roos,s2)0. For Panel A, the investment horizon is one month, and for Panel B, it is one year. The RPE are computed at the monthly (EOM) frequency. The out-of-sample testing period starts in January 1996 and ends in November 2018 (Panel A) or December 2017 (Panel B), respectively. The features are rank-scaled as described in Section 3.6. The machine learning results are obtained using the long training scheme depicted in Figure 2.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close