Performance comparison, one-month horizon, monthly frequency: theory-based vs. machine learning approaches vs. hybrid approach, rank transformation
100 . | Std Dev . | p-val. . | SR . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Theory-based | MW | 0.1 | 3.4 | 0.206 | 0.32 |
KT | −2.0 | 7.2 | 0.739 | 0.32 | |
Machine learning | ENet | −0.1 | 2.8 | 0.277 | 0.26 |
ANN | −0.1 | 2.9 | 0.163 | 0.04 | |
GBRT | −2.5 | 5.3 | 0.914 | 0.17 | |
RF | −4.7 | 8.3 | 0.898 | −0.06 | |
Ens | −0.9 | 3.9 | 0.454 | −0.01 | |
ML with theory features | ENet | −0.1 | 2.8 | 0.277 | 0.26 |
ANN | −0.2 | 3.0 | 0.214 | 0.15 | |
GBRT | −8.5 | 15.9 | 0.926 | 0.19 | |
RF | −5.7 | 9.8 | 0.943 | −0.11 | |
Ens | −2.1 | 5.6 | 0.691 | 0.00 |
100 . | Std Dev . | p-val. . | SR . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Theory-based | MW | 0.1 | 3.4 | 0.206 | 0.32 |
KT | −2.0 | 7.2 | 0.739 | 0.32 | |
Machine learning | ENet | −0.1 | 2.8 | 0.277 | 0.26 |
ANN | −0.1 | 2.9 | 0.163 | 0.04 | |
GBRT | −2.5 | 5.3 | 0.914 | 0.17 | |
RF | −4.7 | 8.3 | 0.898 | −0.06 | |
Ens | −0.9 | 3.9 | 0.454 | −0.01 | |
ML with theory features | ENet | −0.1 | 2.8 | 0.277 | 0.26 |
ANN | −0.2 | 3.0 | 0.214 | 0.15 | |
GBRT | −8.5 | 15.9 | 0.926 | 0.19 | |
RF | −5.7 | 9.8 | 0.943 | −0.11 | |
Ens | −2.1 | 5.6 | 0.691 | 0.00 |
Notes: This table reports predictive , their standard deviation and statistical significance, and the annualized Sharpe ratios (SR) implied by Martin and Wagner’s (2019) and Kadan and Tang’s (2020) theory-based approaches, the five machine learning models, and a hybrid approach in which the theory-based RPE serve as additional features in the machine learning models (ML with theory features). The standard deviation of the (Std Dev) is calculated based on the annual test samples. The SR refer to a zero-investment strategy long in the portfolio of stocks with the highest excess return prediction and short in the portfolio of stocks with the lowest excess return prediction. The p-values are associated with a test of the null hypothesis that the respective excess return prediction has no explanatory power over the zero forecast, . The RPE refer to a one-month investment horizon and are computed at the monthly (EOM) frequency. The out-of-sample testing period starts in January 1998 and ends in November 2018. The features are rank-scaled as described in Section 3.6. The machine learning results are obtained using the short training scheme depicted in Figure 3.
Performance comparison, one-month horizon, monthly frequency: theory-based vs. machine learning approaches vs. hybrid approach, rank transformation
100 . | Std Dev . | p-val. . | SR . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Theory-based | MW | 0.1 | 3.4 | 0.206 | 0.32 |
KT | −2.0 | 7.2 | 0.739 | 0.32 | |
Machine learning | ENet | −0.1 | 2.8 | 0.277 | 0.26 |
ANN | −0.1 | 2.9 | 0.163 | 0.04 | |
GBRT | −2.5 | 5.3 | 0.914 | 0.17 | |
RF | −4.7 | 8.3 | 0.898 | −0.06 | |
Ens | −0.9 | 3.9 | 0.454 | −0.01 | |
ML with theory features | ENet | −0.1 | 2.8 | 0.277 | 0.26 |
ANN | −0.2 | 3.0 | 0.214 | 0.15 | |
GBRT | −8.5 | 15.9 | 0.926 | 0.19 | |
RF | −5.7 | 9.8 | 0.943 | −0.11 | |
Ens | −2.1 | 5.6 | 0.691 | 0.00 |
100 . | Std Dev . | p-val. . | SR . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Theory-based | MW | 0.1 | 3.4 | 0.206 | 0.32 |
KT | −2.0 | 7.2 | 0.739 | 0.32 | |
Machine learning | ENet | −0.1 | 2.8 | 0.277 | 0.26 |
ANN | −0.1 | 2.9 | 0.163 | 0.04 | |
GBRT | −2.5 | 5.3 | 0.914 | 0.17 | |
RF | −4.7 | 8.3 | 0.898 | −0.06 | |
Ens | −0.9 | 3.9 | 0.454 | −0.01 | |
ML with theory features | ENet | −0.1 | 2.8 | 0.277 | 0.26 |
ANN | −0.2 | 3.0 | 0.214 | 0.15 | |
GBRT | −8.5 | 15.9 | 0.926 | 0.19 | |
RF | −5.7 | 9.8 | 0.943 | −0.11 | |
Ens | −2.1 | 5.6 | 0.691 | 0.00 |
Notes: This table reports predictive , their standard deviation and statistical significance, and the annualized Sharpe ratios (SR) implied by Martin and Wagner’s (2019) and Kadan and Tang’s (2020) theory-based approaches, the five machine learning models, and a hybrid approach in which the theory-based RPE serve as additional features in the machine learning models (ML with theory features). The standard deviation of the (Std Dev) is calculated based on the annual test samples. The SR refer to a zero-investment strategy long in the portfolio of stocks with the highest excess return prediction and short in the portfolio of stocks with the lowest excess return prediction. The p-values are associated with a test of the null hypothesis that the respective excess return prediction has no explanatory power over the zero forecast, . The RPE refer to a one-month investment horizon and are computed at the monthly (EOM) frequency. The out-of-sample testing period starts in January 1998 and ends in November 2018. The features are rank-scaled as described in Section 3.6. The machine learning results are obtained using the short training scheme depicted in Figure 3.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.