Generalized linear model-based logistic regression considering time and site of female Culicoides landing on cattle as explanatory factors for engorged and non-engorged Culicoides age groups
Sites . | Species . | Feeding group . | Intercept (a ± SE) (Wald χ2) . | Time of Culicoides landing on cattle (b1 ± SE) (Wald χ2) . | Landing site of Culicoides on cattle (b2 ± SE) (Wald χ2) . | Interaction between Time and site of Culicoides landing on host (b3 ± SE) (Wald χ2) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dharan (DH) | Culicoides oxystoma | Engorged | −1.961 ± 0.59 (11.44) | 0.131 ± 0.07 (3.23) | −0.599 ± 0.2 (9.29) | 0.025 ± 0.023 (1.17) |
Non-engorged | −0.991 ± 0.4 (6.2) | 0.110 ± 0.05 (4.21) | −0.498 ± 0.12 (17.15) | 0.02 ± 0.02 (1.31) | ||
Culicoides peregrinus | Engorged | −1.78 ± 0.46 (14.75) | 0.17 ± 0.06 (7.30) | −0.37 ± 0.14 (7.08) | −0.003 ± 0.018 (0.038) | |
Non-engorged | −2.073 ± 0.47 (19.20) | 0.184 ± 0.06 (8.614) | −0.264 ± 0.13 (3.90) | −0.013 ± 0.018 (0.559) | ||
Sahebganj- Tantipara (ST) | Culicoides oxystoma | Engorged | −0.985 ± 0.5 (3.97) | 0.070 ± 0.07 (1.10) | −0.585 ± 0.16 (12.82) | 0.020 ± 0.021 (0.92) |
Non-engorged | −0.76 ± 0.43 (3.12) | 0.09 ± 0.06 (2.10) | −0.509 ± 0.13 (15.31) | 0.018 ± 0.02 (1.09) | ||
Culicoides peregrinus | Engorged | −1.690 ± 0.5 (10.81) | 0.183 ± 0.07 (7.55) | −0.463 ± 0.16 (8.53) | 0.009 ± 0.02 (0.23) | |
Non-engorged | −1.868 ± 0.49 (14.67) | 0.182 ± 0.07 (7.60) | −0.234 ± 0.14 (2.96) | −0.020 ± 0.019 (1.13) |
Sites . | Species . | Feeding group . | Intercept (a ± SE) (Wald χ2) . | Time of Culicoides landing on cattle (b1 ± SE) (Wald χ2) . | Landing site of Culicoides on cattle (b2 ± SE) (Wald χ2) . | Interaction between Time and site of Culicoides landing on host (b3 ± SE) (Wald χ2) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dharan (DH) | Culicoides oxystoma | Engorged | −1.961 ± 0.59 (11.44) | 0.131 ± 0.07 (3.23) | −0.599 ± 0.2 (9.29) | 0.025 ± 0.023 (1.17) |
Non-engorged | −0.991 ± 0.4 (6.2) | 0.110 ± 0.05 (4.21) | −0.498 ± 0.12 (17.15) | 0.02 ± 0.02 (1.31) | ||
Culicoides peregrinus | Engorged | −1.78 ± 0.46 (14.75) | 0.17 ± 0.06 (7.30) | −0.37 ± 0.14 (7.08) | −0.003 ± 0.018 (0.038) | |
Non-engorged | −2.073 ± 0.47 (19.20) | 0.184 ± 0.06 (8.614) | −0.264 ± 0.13 (3.90) | −0.013 ± 0.018 (0.559) | ||
Sahebganj- Tantipara (ST) | Culicoides oxystoma | Engorged | −0.985 ± 0.5 (3.97) | 0.070 ± 0.07 (1.10) | −0.585 ± 0.16 (12.82) | 0.020 ± 0.021 (0.92) |
Non-engorged | −0.76 ± 0.43 (3.12) | 0.09 ± 0.06 (2.10) | −0.509 ± 0.13 (15.31) | 0.018 ± 0.02 (1.09) | ||
Culicoides peregrinus | Engorged | −1.690 ± 0.5 (10.81) | 0.183 ± 0.07 (7.55) | −0.463 ± 0.16 (8.53) | 0.009 ± 0.02 (0.23) | |
Non-engorged | −1.868 ± 0.49 (14.67) | 0.182 ± 0.07 (7.60) | −0.234 ± 0.14 (2.96) | −0.020 ± 0.019 (1.13) |
The values in bold indicate significance at P < 0.05 level as per the Wald’s Chi-square values (mentioned within bracket in each cell).
Generalized linear model-based logistic regression considering time and site of female Culicoides landing on cattle as explanatory factors for engorged and non-engorged Culicoides age groups
Sites . | Species . | Feeding group . | Intercept (a ± SE) (Wald χ2) . | Time of Culicoides landing on cattle (b1 ± SE) (Wald χ2) . | Landing site of Culicoides on cattle (b2 ± SE) (Wald χ2) . | Interaction between Time and site of Culicoides landing on host (b3 ± SE) (Wald χ2) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dharan (DH) | Culicoides oxystoma | Engorged | −1.961 ± 0.59 (11.44) | 0.131 ± 0.07 (3.23) | −0.599 ± 0.2 (9.29) | 0.025 ± 0.023 (1.17) |
Non-engorged | −0.991 ± 0.4 (6.2) | 0.110 ± 0.05 (4.21) | −0.498 ± 0.12 (17.15) | 0.02 ± 0.02 (1.31) | ||
Culicoides peregrinus | Engorged | −1.78 ± 0.46 (14.75) | 0.17 ± 0.06 (7.30) | −0.37 ± 0.14 (7.08) | −0.003 ± 0.018 (0.038) | |
Non-engorged | −2.073 ± 0.47 (19.20) | 0.184 ± 0.06 (8.614) | −0.264 ± 0.13 (3.90) | −0.013 ± 0.018 (0.559) | ||
Sahebganj- Tantipara (ST) | Culicoides oxystoma | Engorged | −0.985 ± 0.5 (3.97) | 0.070 ± 0.07 (1.10) | −0.585 ± 0.16 (12.82) | 0.020 ± 0.021 (0.92) |
Non-engorged | −0.76 ± 0.43 (3.12) | 0.09 ± 0.06 (2.10) | −0.509 ± 0.13 (15.31) | 0.018 ± 0.02 (1.09) | ||
Culicoides peregrinus | Engorged | −1.690 ± 0.5 (10.81) | 0.183 ± 0.07 (7.55) | −0.463 ± 0.16 (8.53) | 0.009 ± 0.02 (0.23) | |
Non-engorged | −1.868 ± 0.49 (14.67) | 0.182 ± 0.07 (7.60) | −0.234 ± 0.14 (2.96) | −0.020 ± 0.019 (1.13) |
Sites . | Species . | Feeding group . | Intercept (a ± SE) (Wald χ2) . | Time of Culicoides landing on cattle (b1 ± SE) (Wald χ2) . | Landing site of Culicoides on cattle (b2 ± SE) (Wald χ2) . | Interaction between Time and site of Culicoides landing on host (b3 ± SE) (Wald χ2) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dharan (DH) | Culicoides oxystoma | Engorged | −1.961 ± 0.59 (11.44) | 0.131 ± 0.07 (3.23) | −0.599 ± 0.2 (9.29) | 0.025 ± 0.023 (1.17) |
Non-engorged | −0.991 ± 0.4 (6.2) | 0.110 ± 0.05 (4.21) | −0.498 ± 0.12 (17.15) | 0.02 ± 0.02 (1.31) | ||
Culicoides peregrinus | Engorged | −1.78 ± 0.46 (14.75) | 0.17 ± 0.06 (7.30) | −0.37 ± 0.14 (7.08) | −0.003 ± 0.018 (0.038) | |
Non-engorged | −2.073 ± 0.47 (19.20) | 0.184 ± 0.06 (8.614) | −0.264 ± 0.13 (3.90) | −0.013 ± 0.018 (0.559) | ||
Sahebganj- Tantipara (ST) | Culicoides oxystoma | Engorged | −0.985 ± 0.5 (3.97) | 0.070 ± 0.07 (1.10) | −0.585 ± 0.16 (12.82) | 0.020 ± 0.021 (0.92) |
Non-engorged | −0.76 ± 0.43 (3.12) | 0.09 ± 0.06 (2.10) | −0.509 ± 0.13 (15.31) | 0.018 ± 0.02 (1.09) | ||
Culicoides peregrinus | Engorged | −1.690 ± 0.5 (10.81) | 0.183 ± 0.07 (7.55) | −0.463 ± 0.16 (8.53) | 0.009 ± 0.02 (0.23) | |
Non-engorged | −1.868 ± 0.49 (14.67) | 0.182 ± 0.07 (7.60) | −0.234 ± 0.14 (2.96) | −0.020 ± 0.019 (1.13) |
The values in bold indicate significance at P < 0.05 level as per the Wald’s Chi-square values (mentioned within bracket in each cell).
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.