Table 3:

Incidence of prolonged air leak in digital versus analogue drainage systems

StudyStudy typeNumber of patientsIncidence of prolonged air leak by %, RR, or OR (digital versus analog)
Marjanski et al. [17]RCT, single centre646 vs 9, P = 0.641
Takamochi et al. [19]RCT, single centre2998.1 vs 7.9, P = 0.944
Brunelli et al. [21]RCT, single centre1593 vs 0.6, P = 0.2
De Waele et al. [23]RCT, single centre1031.7 vs 8, P = 0.025
Filosso et al. [24]RCT, single centre31Actual number not reported but no statistically significant difference, P = 0.23
Pompili et al. [25]RCT, multicentre3812.6 vs 5.6, P = 0.03
Comacchio et al. [26]RCT, multicentre4656 vs 5, P = 0.47
Mendogni et al. [27]RCT, multicentre2092.6 vs 1.1, P = 0.999
Zhou et al. [28]Meta-analysisNot reported, 5 studiesRR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.36–1.49, I2 = 41.2%, P = 0.147
Chang et al. [29]Meta-analysis2709OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.42–1.39, P = 0.78
Zhou et al. [31]Meta-analysisNot reported, 3 studiesRR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.04–3.17, P = 0.36
StudyStudy typeNumber of patientsIncidence of prolonged air leak by %, RR, or OR (digital versus analog)
Marjanski et al. [17]RCT, single centre646 vs 9, P = 0.641
Takamochi et al. [19]RCT, single centre2998.1 vs 7.9, P = 0.944
Brunelli et al. [21]RCT, single centre1593 vs 0.6, P = 0.2
De Waele et al. [23]RCT, single centre1031.7 vs 8, P = 0.025
Filosso et al. [24]RCT, single centre31Actual number not reported but no statistically significant difference, P = 0.23
Pompili et al. [25]RCT, multicentre3812.6 vs 5.6, P = 0.03
Comacchio et al. [26]RCT, multicentre4656 vs 5, P = 0.47
Mendogni et al. [27]RCT, multicentre2092.6 vs 1.1, P = 0.999
Zhou et al. [28]Meta-analysisNot reported, 5 studiesRR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.36–1.49, I2 = 41.2%, P = 0.147
Chang et al. [29]Meta-analysis2709OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.42–1.39, P = 0.78
Zhou et al. [31]Meta-analysisNot reported, 3 studiesRR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.04–3.17, P = 0.36

CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomized controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

Table 3:

Incidence of prolonged air leak in digital versus analogue drainage systems

StudyStudy typeNumber of patientsIncidence of prolonged air leak by %, RR, or OR (digital versus analog)
Marjanski et al. [17]RCT, single centre646 vs 9, P = 0.641
Takamochi et al. [19]RCT, single centre2998.1 vs 7.9, P = 0.944
Brunelli et al. [21]RCT, single centre1593 vs 0.6, P = 0.2
De Waele et al. [23]RCT, single centre1031.7 vs 8, P = 0.025
Filosso et al. [24]RCT, single centre31Actual number not reported but no statistically significant difference, P = 0.23
Pompili et al. [25]RCT, multicentre3812.6 vs 5.6, P = 0.03
Comacchio et al. [26]RCT, multicentre4656 vs 5, P = 0.47
Mendogni et al. [27]RCT, multicentre2092.6 vs 1.1, P = 0.999
Zhou et al. [28]Meta-analysisNot reported, 5 studiesRR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.36–1.49, I2 = 41.2%, P = 0.147
Chang et al. [29]Meta-analysis2709OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.42–1.39, P = 0.78
Zhou et al. [31]Meta-analysisNot reported, 3 studiesRR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.04–3.17, P = 0.36
StudyStudy typeNumber of patientsIncidence of prolonged air leak by %, RR, or OR (digital versus analog)
Marjanski et al. [17]RCT, single centre646 vs 9, P = 0.641
Takamochi et al. [19]RCT, single centre2998.1 vs 7.9, P = 0.944
Brunelli et al. [21]RCT, single centre1593 vs 0.6, P = 0.2
De Waele et al. [23]RCT, single centre1031.7 vs 8, P = 0.025
Filosso et al. [24]RCT, single centre31Actual number not reported but no statistically significant difference, P = 0.23
Pompili et al. [25]RCT, multicentre3812.6 vs 5.6, P = 0.03
Comacchio et al. [26]RCT, multicentre4656 vs 5, P = 0.47
Mendogni et al. [27]RCT, multicentre2092.6 vs 1.1, P = 0.999
Zhou et al. [28]Meta-analysisNot reported, 5 studiesRR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.36–1.49, I2 = 41.2%, P = 0.147
Chang et al. [29]Meta-analysis2709OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.42–1.39, P = 0.78
Zhou et al. [31]Meta-analysisNot reported, 3 studiesRR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.04–3.17, P = 0.36

CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomized controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close