Incidence of prolonged air leak in digital versus analogue drainage systems
Study . | Study type . | Number of patients . | Incidence of prolonged air leak by %, RR, or OR (digital versus analog) . |
---|---|---|---|
Marjanski et al. [17] | RCT, single centre | 64 | 6 vs 9, P = 0.641 |
Takamochi et al. [19] | RCT, single centre | 299 | 8.1 vs 7.9, P = 0.944 |
Brunelli et al. [21] | RCT, single centre | 159 | 3 vs 0.6, P = 0.2 |
De Waele et al. [23] | RCT, single centre | 103 | 1.7 vs 8, P = 0.025 |
Filosso et al. [24] | RCT, single centre | 31 | Actual number not reported but no statistically significant difference, P = 0.23 |
Pompili et al. [25] | RCT, multicentre | 381 | 2.6 vs 5.6, P = 0.03 |
Comacchio et al. [26] | RCT, multicentre | 465 | 6 vs 5, P = 0.47 |
Mendogni et al. [27] | RCT, multicentre | 209 | 2.6 vs 1.1, P = 0.999 |
Zhou et al. [28] | Meta-analysis | Not reported, 5 studies | RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.36–1.49, I2 = 41.2%, P = 0.147 |
Chang et al. [29] | Meta-analysis | 2709 | OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.42–1.39, P = 0.78 |
Zhou et al. [31] | Meta-analysis | Not reported, 3 studies | RR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.04–3.17, P = 0.36 |
Study . | Study type . | Number of patients . | Incidence of prolonged air leak by %, RR, or OR (digital versus analog) . |
---|---|---|---|
Marjanski et al. [17] | RCT, single centre | 64 | 6 vs 9, P = 0.641 |
Takamochi et al. [19] | RCT, single centre | 299 | 8.1 vs 7.9, P = 0.944 |
Brunelli et al. [21] | RCT, single centre | 159 | 3 vs 0.6, P = 0.2 |
De Waele et al. [23] | RCT, single centre | 103 | 1.7 vs 8, P = 0.025 |
Filosso et al. [24] | RCT, single centre | 31 | Actual number not reported but no statistically significant difference, P = 0.23 |
Pompili et al. [25] | RCT, multicentre | 381 | 2.6 vs 5.6, P = 0.03 |
Comacchio et al. [26] | RCT, multicentre | 465 | 6 vs 5, P = 0.47 |
Mendogni et al. [27] | RCT, multicentre | 209 | 2.6 vs 1.1, P = 0.999 |
Zhou et al. [28] | Meta-analysis | Not reported, 5 studies | RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.36–1.49, I2 = 41.2%, P = 0.147 |
Chang et al. [29] | Meta-analysis | 2709 | OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.42–1.39, P = 0.78 |
Zhou et al. [31] | Meta-analysis | Not reported, 3 studies | RR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.04–3.17, P = 0.36 |
CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomized controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.
Incidence of prolonged air leak in digital versus analogue drainage systems
Study . | Study type . | Number of patients . | Incidence of prolonged air leak by %, RR, or OR (digital versus analog) . |
---|---|---|---|
Marjanski et al. [17] | RCT, single centre | 64 | 6 vs 9, P = 0.641 |
Takamochi et al. [19] | RCT, single centre | 299 | 8.1 vs 7.9, P = 0.944 |
Brunelli et al. [21] | RCT, single centre | 159 | 3 vs 0.6, P = 0.2 |
De Waele et al. [23] | RCT, single centre | 103 | 1.7 vs 8, P = 0.025 |
Filosso et al. [24] | RCT, single centre | 31 | Actual number not reported but no statistically significant difference, P = 0.23 |
Pompili et al. [25] | RCT, multicentre | 381 | 2.6 vs 5.6, P = 0.03 |
Comacchio et al. [26] | RCT, multicentre | 465 | 6 vs 5, P = 0.47 |
Mendogni et al. [27] | RCT, multicentre | 209 | 2.6 vs 1.1, P = 0.999 |
Zhou et al. [28] | Meta-analysis | Not reported, 5 studies | RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.36–1.49, I2 = 41.2%, P = 0.147 |
Chang et al. [29] | Meta-analysis | 2709 | OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.42–1.39, P = 0.78 |
Zhou et al. [31] | Meta-analysis | Not reported, 3 studies | RR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.04–3.17, P = 0.36 |
Study . | Study type . | Number of patients . | Incidence of prolonged air leak by %, RR, or OR (digital versus analog) . |
---|---|---|---|
Marjanski et al. [17] | RCT, single centre | 64 | 6 vs 9, P = 0.641 |
Takamochi et al. [19] | RCT, single centre | 299 | 8.1 vs 7.9, P = 0.944 |
Brunelli et al. [21] | RCT, single centre | 159 | 3 vs 0.6, P = 0.2 |
De Waele et al. [23] | RCT, single centre | 103 | 1.7 vs 8, P = 0.025 |
Filosso et al. [24] | RCT, single centre | 31 | Actual number not reported but no statistically significant difference, P = 0.23 |
Pompili et al. [25] | RCT, multicentre | 381 | 2.6 vs 5.6, P = 0.03 |
Comacchio et al. [26] | RCT, multicentre | 465 | 6 vs 5, P = 0.47 |
Mendogni et al. [27] | RCT, multicentre | 209 | 2.6 vs 1.1, P = 0.999 |
Zhou et al. [28] | Meta-analysis | Not reported, 5 studies | RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.36–1.49, I2 = 41.2%, P = 0.147 |
Chang et al. [29] | Meta-analysis | 2709 | OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.42–1.39, P = 0.78 |
Zhou et al. [31] | Meta-analysis | Not reported, 3 studies | RR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.04–3.17, P = 0.36 |
CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomized controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.