Table 2

Example of target characters in the first experiment M (SE).

 IdenticalOrthographicHomophoneUnrelated
Frequency16.80 (4.27)5.04 (1.06)5.89 (1.12)5.34 (1.05)
Stroke9.98 (.35)9.64 (.30)9.56 (.32)9.47 (.26)
Orthographic similarity4.01 (.05)1.17 (.02)1.17 (.02)
Semantic relatedness1.39 (.05)1.44 (.04)1.38 (.05)
 IdenticalOrthographicHomophoneUnrelated
Frequency16.80 (4.27)5.04 (1.06)5.89 (1.12)5.34 (1.05)
Stroke9.98 (.35)9.64 (.30)9.56 (.32)9.47 (.26)
Orthographic similarity4.01 (.05)1.17 (.02)1.17 (.02)
Semantic relatedness1.39 (.05)1.44 (.04)1.38 (.05)

Note. Frequency from Cai and Brysbaert’s (2010) SUBTLEX-CH.

Table 2

Example of target characters in the first experiment M (SE).

 IdenticalOrthographicHomophoneUnrelated
Frequency16.80 (4.27)5.04 (1.06)5.89 (1.12)5.34 (1.05)
Stroke9.98 (.35)9.64 (.30)9.56 (.32)9.47 (.26)
Orthographic similarity4.01 (.05)1.17 (.02)1.17 (.02)
Semantic relatedness1.39 (.05)1.44 (.04)1.38 (.05)
 IdenticalOrthographicHomophoneUnrelated
Frequency16.80 (4.27)5.04 (1.06)5.89 (1.12)5.34 (1.05)
Stroke9.98 (.35)9.64 (.30)9.56 (.32)9.47 (.26)
Orthographic similarity4.01 (.05)1.17 (.02)1.17 (.02)
Semantic relatedness1.39 (.05)1.44 (.04)1.38 (.05)

Note. Frequency from Cai and Brysbaert’s (2010) SUBTLEX-CH.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close