Table 2.

The USA – pre-product stages/market

StageResearch and Development Markets(Technology) marketProducts on the market
Product development process
  • A research and development market consists of the assets comprising research and development related to the identification of a commercializable product or directed to particular new or improved goods or processes, and the close substitutes for that research and development.

  • ‘products that would result from that innovation if successful, even if those products do not yet exist.’

The ‘licensed technology’ and its close substitutes—that is, the technologies or goods that are close enough substitutes to constrain significantly the exercise of market power with respect to the intellectual property that is licensed.The goods including the IP
AuthorityIP licensing guidelines, paragraph 3.2.3, Illumina, Inc. v. FTC, and Merger Guidelines, section 4.3.D.7.IP licensing guidelines, paragraph 3.2.2 and Broadcom Corp v Qualcomm Inc., 501 F.3d 297, 315 (3d Cir. 2007); Apple Inc v Samsung Elecs Co, No 11-CV-01846, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67102, at *19–23 (N.D. Cal. May 14, 2012)IP licensing guidelines, paragraph 3.2.1.2023 US Merger Guidelines
StageResearch and Development Markets(Technology) marketProducts on the market
Product development process
  • A research and development market consists of the assets comprising research and development related to the identification of a commercializable product or directed to particular new or improved goods or processes, and the close substitutes for that research and development.

  • ‘products that would result from that innovation if successful, even if those products do not yet exist.’

The ‘licensed technology’ and its close substitutes—that is, the technologies or goods that are close enough substitutes to constrain significantly the exercise of market power with respect to the intellectual property that is licensed.The goods including the IP
AuthorityIP licensing guidelines, paragraph 3.2.3, Illumina, Inc. v. FTC, and Merger Guidelines, section 4.3.D.7.IP licensing guidelines, paragraph 3.2.2 and Broadcom Corp v Qualcomm Inc., 501 F.3d 297, 315 (3d Cir. 2007); Apple Inc v Samsung Elecs Co, No 11-CV-01846, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67102, at *19–23 (N.D. Cal. May 14, 2012)IP licensing guidelines, paragraph 3.2.1.2023 US Merger Guidelines
Table 2.

The USA – pre-product stages/market

StageResearch and Development Markets(Technology) marketProducts on the market
Product development process
  • A research and development market consists of the assets comprising research and development related to the identification of a commercializable product or directed to particular new or improved goods or processes, and the close substitutes for that research and development.

  • ‘products that would result from that innovation if successful, even if those products do not yet exist.’

The ‘licensed technology’ and its close substitutes—that is, the technologies or goods that are close enough substitutes to constrain significantly the exercise of market power with respect to the intellectual property that is licensed.The goods including the IP
AuthorityIP licensing guidelines, paragraph 3.2.3, Illumina, Inc. v. FTC, and Merger Guidelines, section 4.3.D.7.IP licensing guidelines, paragraph 3.2.2 and Broadcom Corp v Qualcomm Inc., 501 F.3d 297, 315 (3d Cir. 2007); Apple Inc v Samsung Elecs Co, No 11-CV-01846, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67102, at *19–23 (N.D. Cal. May 14, 2012)IP licensing guidelines, paragraph 3.2.1.2023 US Merger Guidelines
StageResearch and Development Markets(Technology) marketProducts on the market
Product development process
  • A research and development market consists of the assets comprising research and development related to the identification of a commercializable product or directed to particular new or improved goods or processes, and the close substitutes for that research and development.

  • ‘products that would result from that innovation if successful, even if those products do not yet exist.’

The ‘licensed technology’ and its close substitutes—that is, the technologies or goods that are close enough substitutes to constrain significantly the exercise of market power with respect to the intellectual property that is licensed.The goods including the IP
AuthorityIP licensing guidelines, paragraph 3.2.3, Illumina, Inc. v. FTC, and Merger Guidelines, section 4.3.D.7.IP licensing guidelines, paragraph 3.2.2 and Broadcom Corp v Qualcomm Inc., 501 F.3d 297, 315 (3d Cir. 2007); Apple Inc v Samsung Elecs Co, No 11-CV-01846, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67102, at *19–23 (N.D. Cal. May 14, 2012)IP licensing guidelines, paragraph 3.2.1.2023 US Merger Guidelines
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close