Table A1.

Effect of super-arbitrators on outcome. Controls for matter, case year, and appealed by SGB included in the models but not displayed.

Model 1Model 2
Applicant arbitrator super-arbitrator0.27*0.27*
(0.12)(0.12)
Respondent arbitrator super-arbitrator−0.28*−0.28*
(0.12)(0.12)
President super-arbitrator0.01
(0.12)
N13001300
AIC1752.771750.78
BIC1980.261973.09
Pseudo R20.130.13
Model 1Model 2
Applicant arbitrator super-arbitrator0.27*0.27*
(0.12)(0.12)
Respondent arbitrator super-arbitrator−0.28*−0.28*
(0.12)(0.12)
President super-arbitrator0.01
(0.12)
N13001300
AIC1752.771750.78
BIC1980.261973.09
Pseudo R20.130.13

***p < 0.001;

**p < 0.01;

*p < 0.05.

Table A1.

Effect of super-arbitrators on outcome. Controls for matter, case year, and appealed by SGB included in the models but not displayed.

Model 1Model 2
Applicant arbitrator super-arbitrator0.27*0.27*
(0.12)(0.12)
Respondent arbitrator super-arbitrator−0.28*−0.28*
(0.12)(0.12)
President super-arbitrator0.01
(0.12)
N13001300
AIC1752.771750.78
BIC1980.261973.09
Pseudo R20.130.13
Model 1Model 2
Applicant arbitrator super-arbitrator0.27*0.27*
(0.12)(0.12)
Respondent arbitrator super-arbitrator−0.28*−0.28*
(0.12)(0.12)
President super-arbitrator0.01
(0.12)
N13001300
AIC1752.771750.78
BIC1980.261973.09
Pseudo R20.130.13

***p < 0.001;

**p < 0.01;

*p < 0.05.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close