Effect of super-arbitrators on outcome. Controls for matter, case year, and appealed by SGB included in the models but not displayed.
Model 1 . | Model 2 . | |
---|---|---|
Applicant arbitrator super-arbitrator | 0.27* | 0.27* |
(0.12) | (0.12) | |
Respondent arbitrator super-arbitrator | −0.28* | −0.28* |
(0.12) | (0.12) | |
President super-arbitrator | 0.01 | |
(0.12) | ||
N | 1300 | 1300 |
AIC | 1752.77 | 1750.78 |
BIC | 1980.26 | 1973.09 |
Pseudo R2 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
Model 1 . | Model 2 . | |
---|---|---|
Applicant arbitrator super-arbitrator | 0.27* | 0.27* |
(0.12) | (0.12) | |
Respondent arbitrator super-arbitrator | −0.28* | −0.28* |
(0.12) | (0.12) | |
President super-arbitrator | 0.01 | |
(0.12) | ||
N | 1300 | 1300 |
AIC | 1752.77 | 1750.78 |
BIC | 1980.26 | 1973.09 |
Pseudo R2 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
***p < 0.001;
**p < 0.01;
*p < 0.05.
Effect of super-arbitrators on outcome. Controls for matter, case year, and appealed by SGB included in the models but not displayed.
Model 1 . | Model 2 . | |
---|---|---|
Applicant arbitrator super-arbitrator | 0.27* | 0.27* |
(0.12) | (0.12) | |
Respondent arbitrator super-arbitrator | −0.28* | −0.28* |
(0.12) | (0.12) | |
President super-arbitrator | 0.01 | |
(0.12) | ||
N | 1300 | 1300 |
AIC | 1752.77 | 1750.78 |
BIC | 1980.26 | 1973.09 |
Pseudo R2 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
Model 1 . | Model 2 . | |
---|---|---|
Applicant arbitrator super-arbitrator | 0.27* | 0.27* |
(0.12) | (0.12) | |
Respondent arbitrator super-arbitrator | −0.28* | −0.28* |
(0.12) | (0.12) | |
President super-arbitrator | 0.01 | |
(0.12) | ||
N | 1300 | 1300 |
AIC | 1752.77 | 1750.78 |
BIC | 1980.26 | 1973.09 |
Pseudo R2 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
***p < 0.001;
**p < 0.01;
*p < 0.05.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.