Model comparison results using LRTs on individual Drosophila gene alignments
| Null . | Alternative . | Rejected at P = 0.05 . | Rejected at P = 0.05 (Holm–Bonferroni) . | Rejected at q = 0.10 (FDR, Benjamini–Hochberg) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MG94xREV | SynREV | 5,237 (44.2%) | 257 (2.2%) | 4,920 (41.5%) |
| MG94xREV | SynREVCodon | 8,086 (68.3%) | 1,622 (13.7%) | 8,546 (72.2%) |
| SynREV | SynREVCodon | 6,793 (57.4%) | 903 (7.5%) | 7,065 (59.7%) |
| Null . | Alternative . | Rejected at P = 0.05 . | Rejected at P = 0.05 (Holm–Bonferroni) . | Rejected at q = 0.10 (FDR, Benjamini–Hochberg) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MG94xREV | SynREV | 5,237 (44.2%) | 257 (2.2%) | 4,920 (41.5%) |
| MG94xREV | SynREVCodon | 8,086 (68.3%) | 1,622 (13.7%) | 8,546 (72.2%) |
| SynREV | SynREVCodon | 6,793 (57.4%) | 903 (7.5%) | 7,065 (59.7%) |
Model comparison results using LRTs on individual Drosophila gene alignments
| Null . | Alternative . | Rejected at P = 0.05 . | Rejected at P = 0.05 (Holm–Bonferroni) . | Rejected at q = 0.10 (FDR, Benjamini–Hochberg) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MG94xREV | SynREV | 5,237 (44.2%) | 257 (2.2%) | 4,920 (41.5%) |
| MG94xREV | SynREVCodon | 8,086 (68.3%) | 1,622 (13.7%) | 8,546 (72.2%) |
| SynREV | SynREVCodon | 6,793 (57.4%) | 903 (7.5%) | 7,065 (59.7%) |
| Null . | Alternative . | Rejected at P = 0.05 . | Rejected at P = 0.05 (Holm–Bonferroni) . | Rejected at q = 0.10 (FDR, Benjamini–Hochberg) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MG94xREV | SynREV | 5,237 (44.2%) | 257 (2.2%) | 4,920 (41.5%) |
| MG94xREV | SynREVCodon | 8,086 (68.3%) | 1,622 (13.7%) | 8,546 (72.2%) |
| SynREV | SynREVCodon | 6,793 (57.4%) | 903 (7.5%) | 7,065 (59.7%) |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
