Table 4.

Summary of Hypothesis Testing

FACE-Q Aesthetic scaleHypothesis A correctHypothesis B correctHypothesis C correctTotal correct hypothesesAdequate convergent validity?
Face OverallNA0/12 (0.0%)NA0/12 (0.0%)No
Lines OverallNA8/8 (100.0%)4/4 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
Lower Face and JawlineNA1/1 (100.0%)11/11 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: ForeheadNA1/1 (100.0%)11/11 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: Between EyebrowsNA1/1 (100.0%)9/11 (81.8%)10/12 (83.3%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: Crow's FeetNA1/1 (100.0%)10/11 (90.9%)11/12 (91.7%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: Nasolabial FoldsNA1/1 (100.0%)9/11 (81.8%)10/12 (83.3%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: MarionetteNA2/2 (100.0%)8/10 (80.0%)10/12 (83.3%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: LipsNA1/1 (100.0%)11/11 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
LipsNA3/3 (100.0%)9/9 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
CheeksNA0/2 (0.0%)10/10 (100.0%)10/12 (83.3%)No
FACE-Q Aesthetic scaleHypothesis A correctHypothesis B correctHypothesis C correctTotal correct hypothesesAdequate convergent validity?
Face OverallNA0/12 (0.0%)NA0/12 (0.0%)No
Lines OverallNA8/8 (100.0%)4/4 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
Lower Face and JawlineNA1/1 (100.0%)11/11 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: ForeheadNA1/1 (100.0%)11/11 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: Between EyebrowsNA1/1 (100.0%)9/11 (81.8%)10/12 (83.3%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: Crow's FeetNA1/1 (100.0%)10/11 (90.9%)11/12 (91.7%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: Nasolabial FoldsNA1/1 (100.0%)9/11 (81.8%)10/12 (83.3%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: MarionetteNA2/2 (100.0%)8/10 (80.0%)10/12 (83.3%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: LipsNA1/1 (100.0%)11/11 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
LipsNA3/3 (100.0%)9/9 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
CheeksNA0/2 (0.0%)10/10 (100.0%)10/12 (83.3%)No

n, number of correct hypotheses (numerator); N, total number of hypotheses (denominator). Values are given as n/N (%). NA, not applicable; Hypothesis A: correlations with instruments measuring similar constructs should be ≥0.50; Hypothesis B: correlations with instruments measuring related, but dissimilar constructs should be lower, ie, 0.30-0.50; Hypothesis C: correlations with instruments measuring unrelated constructs should be <0.30;

Table 4.

Summary of Hypothesis Testing

FACE-Q Aesthetic scaleHypothesis A correctHypothesis B correctHypothesis C correctTotal correct hypothesesAdequate convergent validity?
Face OverallNA0/12 (0.0%)NA0/12 (0.0%)No
Lines OverallNA8/8 (100.0%)4/4 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
Lower Face and JawlineNA1/1 (100.0%)11/11 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: ForeheadNA1/1 (100.0%)11/11 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: Between EyebrowsNA1/1 (100.0%)9/11 (81.8%)10/12 (83.3%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: Crow's FeetNA1/1 (100.0%)10/11 (90.9%)11/12 (91.7%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: Nasolabial FoldsNA1/1 (100.0%)9/11 (81.8%)10/12 (83.3%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: MarionetteNA2/2 (100.0%)8/10 (80.0%)10/12 (83.3%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: LipsNA1/1 (100.0%)11/11 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
LipsNA3/3 (100.0%)9/9 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
CheeksNA0/2 (0.0%)10/10 (100.0%)10/12 (83.3%)No
FACE-Q Aesthetic scaleHypothesis A correctHypothesis B correctHypothesis C correctTotal correct hypothesesAdequate convergent validity?
Face OverallNA0/12 (0.0%)NA0/12 (0.0%)No
Lines OverallNA8/8 (100.0%)4/4 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
Lower Face and JawlineNA1/1 (100.0%)11/11 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: ForeheadNA1/1 (100.0%)11/11 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: Between EyebrowsNA1/1 (100.0%)9/11 (81.8%)10/12 (83.3%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: Crow's FeetNA1/1 (100.0%)10/11 (90.9%)11/12 (91.7%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: Nasolabial FoldsNA1/1 (100.0%)9/11 (81.8%)10/12 (83.3%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: MarionetteNA2/2 (100.0%)8/10 (80.0%)10/12 (83.3%)Yes
Appraisal of Lines: LipsNA1/1 (100.0%)11/11 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
LipsNA3/3 (100.0%)9/9 (100.0%)12/12 (100.0%)Yes
CheeksNA0/2 (0.0%)10/10 (100.0%)10/12 (83.3%)No

n, number of correct hypotheses (numerator); N, total number of hypotheses (denominator). Values are given as n/N (%). NA, not applicable; Hypothesis A: correlations with instruments measuring similar constructs should be ≥0.50; Hypothesis B: correlations with instruments measuring related, but dissimilar constructs should be lower, ie, 0.30-0.50; Hypothesis C: correlations with instruments measuring unrelated constructs should be <0.30;

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close