Table 12:

Comparison of |${\rm {MAE}}_{{\rm {energy}}}$| in different DHNN–BR2SAT models with different numbers of neurons. Bolded values represent the best values for the same number of neurons.

NNCase ICase IICase III
100.00000.00000.0012
150.02160.06830.0119
202.61680.47710.3247
250.60360.65100.4685
300.79551.09250.6876
350.43341.06420.7973
401.05381.25150.8717
450.88151.45211.2029
500.87611.60771.5236
Best0.00000.00000.0012
Worst2.61681.60771.5236
Avg.0.80910.85160.6544
Avg rank1.72222.72221.5556
NNCase ICase IICase III
100.00000.00000.0012
150.02160.06830.0119
202.61680.47710.3247
250.60360.65100.4685
300.79551.09250.6876
350.43341.06420.7973
401.05381.25150.8717
450.88151.45211.2029
500.87611.60771.5236
Best0.00000.00000.0012
Worst2.61681.60771.5236
Avg.0.80910.85160.6544
Avg rank1.72222.72221.5556
Table 12:

Comparison of |${\rm {MAE}}_{{\rm {energy}}}$| in different DHNN–BR2SAT models with different numbers of neurons. Bolded values represent the best values for the same number of neurons.

NNCase ICase IICase III
100.00000.00000.0012
150.02160.06830.0119
202.61680.47710.3247
250.60360.65100.4685
300.79551.09250.6876
350.43341.06420.7973
401.05381.25150.8717
450.88151.45211.2029
500.87611.60771.5236
Best0.00000.00000.0012
Worst2.61681.60771.5236
Avg.0.80910.85160.6544
Avg rank1.72222.72221.5556
NNCase ICase IICase III
100.00000.00000.0012
150.02160.06830.0119
202.61680.47710.3247
250.60360.65100.4685
300.79551.09250.6876
350.43341.06420.7973
401.05381.25150.8717
450.88151.45211.2029
500.87611.60771.5236
Best0.00000.00000.0012
Worst2.61681.60771.5236
Avg.0.80910.85160.6544
Avg rank1.72222.72221.5556
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close