Table 1:

Features and differences in frequentism and Bayesianism

Frequentism-NHSTBayesianism
Mathematical denotationP (data | hypothesis)P (hypothesis | data)
Conceptual explanationEstimates the probability of observing the data (or more extreme data in repeated similar experiments), under the assumption that H0 is trueUses a posterior distribution, derived from a weighted combination of a prior belief and the current data, to provide probability estimates of a hypothesis given the observed data
Introduction of prior dataImpossibleCentral aspect to obtain the posterior distribution
Use of current data (likelihood)Central aspect used to assess the consistency of the data given a specific parameter, value, or hypothesisCentral aspect which quantifies the observed data support for all possible parameter values, serving as a relative measure of evidence
Adherence to the Likelihood PrincipleViolates the likelihood principleFully respects the likelihood principle
Inference basisIncorporates P-values, significance levels and sampling distributionBased entirely on the posterior distribution
Inferential intervalThe confidence interval (usually 95%), representing the interval that would contain the parameter of interest in 95% of instances in infinite sample of similar future experimentsThe credible interval (usually 95%, or the highest posterior density interval [1]) which represent the interval for where there is 95% (un)certainty that it contains the parameter of interest
Probabilistic quantification of specific hypothesisImpossibleDirectly available from the area under the curve of the posterior distribution
Frequentism-NHSTBayesianism
Mathematical denotationP (data | hypothesis)P (hypothesis | data)
Conceptual explanationEstimates the probability of observing the data (or more extreme data in repeated similar experiments), under the assumption that H0 is trueUses a posterior distribution, derived from a weighted combination of a prior belief and the current data, to provide probability estimates of a hypothesis given the observed data
Introduction of prior dataImpossibleCentral aspect to obtain the posterior distribution
Use of current data (likelihood)Central aspect used to assess the consistency of the data given a specific parameter, value, or hypothesisCentral aspect which quantifies the observed data support for all possible parameter values, serving as a relative measure of evidence
Adherence to the Likelihood PrincipleViolates the likelihood principleFully respects the likelihood principle
Inference basisIncorporates P-values, significance levels and sampling distributionBased entirely on the posterior distribution
Inferential intervalThe confidence interval (usually 95%), representing the interval that would contain the parameter of interest in 95% of instances in infinite sample of similar future experimentsThe credible interval (usually 95%, or the highest posterior density interval [1]) which represent the interval for where there is 95% (un)certainty that it contains the parameter of interest
Probabilistic quantification of specific hypothesisImpossibleDirectly available from the area under the curve of the posterior distribution

Partly based on Heuts et al. [1].

H0: null hypothesis; NHST: null hypothesis significance testing.

Table 1:

Features and differences in frequentism and Bayesianism

Frequentism-NHSTBayesianism
Mathematical denotationP (data | hypothesis)P (hypothesis | data)
Conceptual explanationEstimates the probability of observing the data (or more extreme data in repeated similar experiments), under the assumption that H0 is trueUses a posterior distribution, derived from a weighted combination of a prior belief and the current data, to provide probability estimates of a hypothesis given the observed data
Introduction of prior dataImpossibleCentral aspect to obtain the posterior distribution
Use of current data (likelihood)Central aspect used to assess the consistency of the data given a specific parameter, value, or hypothesisCentral aspect which quantifies the observed data support for all possible parameter values, serving as a relative measure of evidence
Adherence to the Likelihood PrincipleViolates the likelihood principleFully respects the likelihood principle
Inference basisIncorporates P-values, significance levels and sampling distributionBased entirely on the posterior distribution
Inferential intervalThe confidence interval (usually 95%), representing the interval that would contain the parameter of interest in 95% of instances in infinite sample of similar future experimentsThe credible interval (usually 95%, or the highest posterior density interval [1]) which represent the interval for where there is 95% (un)certainty that it contains the parameter of interest
Probabilistic quantification of specific hypothesisImpossibleDirectly available from the area under the curve of the posterior distribution
Frequentism-NHSTBayesianism
Mathematical denotationP (data | hypothesis)P (hypothesis | data)
Conceptual explanationEstimates the probability of observing the data (or more extreme data in repeated similar experiments), under the assumption that H0 is trueUses a posterior distribution, derived from a weighted combination of a prior belief and the current data, to provide probability estimates of a hypothesis given the observed data
Introduction of prior dataImpossibleCentral aspect to obtain the posterior distribution
Use of current data (likelihood)Central aspect used to assess the consistency of the data given a specific parameter, value, or hypothesisCentral aspect which quantifies the observed data support for all possible parameter values, serving as a relative measure of evidence
Adherence to the Likelihood PrincipleViolates the likelihood principleFully respects the likelihood principle
Inference basisIncorporates P-values, significance levels and sampling distributionBased entirely on the posterior distribution
Inferential intervalThe confidence interval (usually 95%), representing the interval that would contain the parameter of interest in 95% of instances in infinite sample of similar future experimentsThe credible interval (usually 95%, or the highest posterior density interval [1]) which represent the interval for where there is 95% (un)certainty that it contains the parameter of interest
Probabilistic quantification of specific hypothesisImpossibleDirectly available from the area under the curve of the posterior distribution

Partly based on Heuts et al. [1].

H0: null hypothesis; NHST: null hypothesis significance testing.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close