Basic regression—intergroup contact and acceptance attitudes towards chinese individuals.
Accept Chinese as colleagues . | Accept Chinese as relatives . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 . | Model 2 . | Model 3 . | Model 4 . | Model 5 . | Model 6 . | Model 7 . | Model 8 . | |
Direct contact . | Parasocial contact . | Both contacts . | Both contacts . | Direct contact . | Parasocial contact . | Both contacts . | Both contacts . | |
Chinese acquaintances (have = 1; not have = 0) | 1.121*** (0.148) | 1.099*** (0.149) | 0.988*** (0.175) | 0.607*** (0.116) | 0.581*** (0.117) | 0.575*** (0.145) | ||
Chinese films (have viewed = 1; not have viewed = 0) | 0.644*** (0.083) | 0.623*** (0.084) | 0.596*** (0.087) | 0.545*** (0.077) | 0.523*** (0.078) | 0.521*** (0.082) | ||
Acquaintances from China × Chinese films | 0.384 (0.335) | 0.017 (0.241) | ||||||
Survey year, Sino-Japanese relations index | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Interest in global matters, social engagement frequency | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Age, educational attainment, urbanity of dwelling, income bracket, and gender | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
_cons | 155.725** (57.905) | 148.8** (57.251) | 143.582* (57.971) | 143.6* (57.897) | 98.617 (54.603) | 86.39 (54.691) | 87.335 (54.911) | 87.371 (54.918) |
Log likelihood | −2,028 | −2,046 | −2,000 | −1,999 | −2,235 | −2,239 | −2,212 | −2,212 |
Observations | 3,363 | 3,383 | 3,363 | 3,363 | 3,355 | 3,378 | 3,355 | 3,355 |
Accept Chinese as colleagues . | Accept Chinese as relatives . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 . | Model 2 . | Model 3 . | Model 4 . | Model 5 . | Model 6 . | Model 7 . | Model 8 . | |
Direct contact . | Parasocial contact . | Both contacts . | Both contacts . | Direct contact . | Parasocial contact . | Both contacts . | Both contacts . | |
Chinese acquaintances (have = 1; not have = 0) | 1.121*** (0.148) | 1.099*** (0.149) | 0.988*** (0.175) | 0.607*** (0.116) | 0.581*** (0.117) | 0.575*** (0.145) | ||
Chinese films (have viewed = 1; not have viewed = 0) | 0.644*** (0.083) | 0.623*** (0.084) | 0.596*** (0.087) | 0.545*** (0.077) | 0.523*** (0.078) | 0.521*** (0.082) | ||
Acquaintances from China × Chinese films | 0.384 (0.335) | 0.017 (0.241) | ||||||
Survey year, Sino-Japanese relations index | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Interest in global matters, social engagement frequency | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Age, educational attainment, urbanity of dwelling, income bracket, and gender | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
_cons | 155.725** (57.905) | 148.8** (57.251) | 143.582* (57.971) | 143.6* (57.897) | 98.617 (54.603) | 86.39 (54.691) | 87.335 (54.911) | 87.371 (54.918) |
Log likelihood | −2,028 | −2,046 | −2,000 | −1,999 | −2,235 | −2,239 | −2,212 | −2,212 |
Observations | 3,363 | 3,383 | 3,363 | 3,363 | 3,355 | 3,378 | 3,355 | 3,355 |
Note: Binomial Logit regression. The full results are available in Appendix Table A2 in the Supplementary Material.
Robust standard errors are in parentheses, *** p < .001, ** p < .01, * p < .05 (two-tailed test).
Basic regression—intergroup contact and acceptance attitudes towards chinese individuals.
Accept Chinese as colleagues . | Accept Chinese as relatives . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 . | Model 2 . | Model 3 . | Model 4 . | Model 5 . | Model 6 . | Model 7 . | Model 8 . | |
Direct contact . | Parasocial contact . | Both contacts . | Both contacts . | Direct contact . | Parasocial contact . | Both contacts . | Both contacts . | |
Chinese acquaintances (have = 1; not have = 0) | 1.121*** (0.148) | 1.099*** (0.149) | 0.988*** (0.175) | 0.607*** (0.116) | 0.581*** (0.117) | 0.575*** (0.145) | ||
Chinese films (have viewed = 1; not have viewed = 0) | 0.644*** (0.083) | 0.623*** (0.084) | 0.596*** (0.087) | 0.545*** (0.077) | 0.523*** (0.078) | 0.521*** (0.082) | ||
Acquaintances from China × Chinese films | 0.384 (0.335) | 0.017 (0.241) | ||||||
Survey year, Sino-Japanese relations index | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Interest in global matters, social engagement frequency | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Age, educational attainment, urbanity of dwelling, income bracket, and gender | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
_cons | 155.725** (57.905) | 148.8** (57.251) | 143.582* (57.971) | 143.6* (57.897) | 98.617 (54.603) | 86.39 (54.691) | 87.335 (54.911) | 87.371 (54.918) |
Log likelihood | −2,028 | −2,046 | −2,000 | −1,999 | −2,235 | −2,239 | −2,212 | −2,212 |
Observations | 3,363 | 3,383 | 3,363 | 3,363 | 3,355 | 3,378 | 3,355 | 3,355 |
Accept Chinese as colleagues . | Accept Chinese as relatives . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 . | Model 2 . | Model 3 . | Model 4 . | Model 5 . | Model 6 . | Model 7 . | Model 8 . | |
Direct contact . | Parasocial contact . | Both contacts . | Both contacts . | Direct contact . | Parasocial contact . | Both contacts . | Both contacts . | |
Chinese acquaintances (have = 1; not have = 0) | 1.121*** (0.148) | 1.099*** (0.149) | 0.988*** (0.175) | 0.607*** (0.116) | 0.581*** (0.117) | 0.575*** (0.145) | ||
Chinese films (have viewed = 1; not have viewed = 0) | 0.644*** (0.083) | 0.623*** (0.084) | 0.596*** (0.087) | 0.545*** (0.077) | 0.523*** (0.078) | 0.521*** (0.082) | ||
Acquaintances from China × Chinese films | 0.384 (0.335) | 0.017 (0.241) | ||||||
Survey year, Sino-Japanese relations index | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Interest in global matters, social engagement frequency | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Age, educational attainment, urbanity of dwelling, income bracket, and gender | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
_cons | 155.725** (57.905) | 148.8** (57.251) | 143.582* (57.971) | 143.6* (57.897) | 98.617 (54.603) | 86.39 (54.691) | 87.335 (54.911) | 87.371 (54.918) |
Log likelihood | −2,028 | −2,046 | −2,000 | −1,999 | −2,235 | −2,239 | −2,212 | −2,212 |
Observations | 3,363 | 3,383 | 3,363 | 3,363 | 3,355 | 3,378 | 3,355 | 3,355 |
Note: Binomial Logit regression. The full results are available in Appendix Table A2 in the Supplementary Material.
Robust standard errors are in parentheses, *** p < .001, ** p < .01, * p < .05 (two-tailed test).
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.