Table 4.

Four categories to analyze integrated intelligence episode.

Interactive data categories
 What (areas of revision)This category captures the specific aspects of the text targeted for revision using the revision heuristic (e.g. grammar, argument support, or disciplinary terminology.)
 How (process—level of revision)The level of interaction students engaged in with the AI tools using the levels of revision (e.g. immediate correction, educational revision, critical engagement.)
Reflective data categories
 How (structure—final decision)This involves how students made a decision about the output resulting in two categories: human-augmented and AI-augmented output.
 WhyThis involves students’ reasoning behind their interaction process and includes three categories: automation, activation preexisting knowledge, and poor knowledge.
Interactive data categories
 What (areas of revision)This category captures the specific aspects of the text targeted for revision using the revision heuristic (e.g. grammar, argument support, or disciplinary terminology.)
 How (process—level of revision)The level of interaction students engaged in with the AI tools using the levels of revision (e.g. immediate correction, educational revision, critical engagement.)
Reflective data categories
 How (structure—final decision)This involves how students made a decision about the output resulting in two categories: human-augmented and AI-augmented output.
 WhyThis involves students’ reasoning behind their interaction process and includes three categories: automation, activation preexisting knowledge, and poor knowledge.
Table 4.

Four categories to analyze integrated intelligence episode.

Interactive data categories
 What (areas of revision)This category captures the specific aspects of the text targeted for revision using the revision heuristic (e.g. grammar, argument support, or disciplinary terminology.)
 How (process—level of revision)The level of interaction students engaged in with the AI tools using the levels of revision (e.g. immediate correction, educational revision, critical engagement.)
Reflective data categories
 How (structure—final decision)This involves how students made a decision about the output resulting in two categories: human-augmented and AI-augmented output.
 WhyThis involves students’ reasoning behind their interaction process and includes three categories: automation, activation preexisting knowledge, and poor knowledge.
Interactive data categories
 What (areas of revision)This category captures the specific aspects of the text targeted for revision using the revision heuristic (e.g. grammar, argument support, or disciplinary terminology.)
 How (process—level of revision)The level of interaction students engaged in with the AI tools using the levels of revision (e.g. immediate correction, educational revision, critical engagement.)
Reflective data categories
 How (structure—final decision)This involves how students made a decision about the output resulting in two categories: human-augmented and AI-augmented output.
 WhyThis involves students’ reasoning behind their interaction process and includes three categories: automation, activation preexisting knowledge, and poor knowledge.
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close