Published data on estimation of RV volumes by different echocardiographic techniques compared with values derived from magnetic resonance imaging
| Echo method and reference . | Population . | N . | Feasibility (%) . | EDV correlation/agreement with MRI . | ESV correlation with MRI . | EF correlation with MRI . | Mean difference EDV . | Reproducibility (EDV) ICC (%) or limits of agreement (mL) . | Test–retest . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method of discs | |||||||||
| Lu et al.98 | Healthy children | 20 | 85 | r = 0.98 | r = 0.96 | r = 0.89 | −3.2 ± 7.0 mL | Intra: 2.1 ± 5.3% Inter: 5.4 ± 9.2% | |
| Renella et al.99 | Varied, including normal and CHD | 70 | 58 | – | – | – | – | Intra: −1.9 mL (−5.1 to 1.3) Inter: −2.0 mL (−6.0 to 2.1) | −0.50 (−3.5 to 2.5) |
| Semi-automated border detection | |||||||||
| Maffessanti et al.100 | Healthy adults | 540 | 94 | – | – | – | – | Intraobserver COV 2–8.6% Interobserver COV 7–15% | – |
| Tamborini et al.101 | Healthy adults | 245 | 94 | – | – | – | −10 mL | Intra: 0.6 ± 5.1 Inter: 0.9 ± 20.3 | 0.2 ± 6.9 |
| Leibundgut et al.102 | Adults with cardiac dysfunction | 100 | 92 | r = 0.84 | r = 0.83 | r = 0.72 | −10 mL | Intra: ICC 0.93 Inter: ICC 0.95 | |
| Jenkins et al.103 | Adults with cardiac dysfunction | 54 | 93 | r = 0.6 | r = 0.55 | r = 0.78 | −3 ± 10 mL | Intra: r = 0.94, 1 ± 3 mL Inter: r = 0.76, 0 ± 10 | r = 0.91, 0 ± 5 |
| Dragulescu et al.104 | Children with CHD | 70 (36 vs. MRI) | 91 | r = 0.98 | r = 0.98 | r = 0.85 | 18.2 ± 17.8 | Intra: COV 5.4 Inter: 8 | |
| Khoo et al.17 | Children with CHD | 54 | 52 | r = 0.91 | r = 0.9 | r = 0.76 | −19.3 ± 6 14 | Inter: ICC 0.97, 11.6 ± 7.0 | |
| Grewal et al.105 | Adults with CHD | 25 | r = 0.88 | r = 0.89 | −9%, max 34% | Inter: 10% | |||
| Van der Zwaan et al.106,107 | Adults with CHD | 62 | 81 | r = 0.93 | r = 0.91 | r = 0.74 | 34 mL LOA −32 to 99 | Intra: 1 ± 12 Inter: ± | 7% |
| Iriart et al.108 | Adults with repaired TOF | 34 | 92 | r = 0.99 ICC = 0.99 | r = 0.98 ICC = 0.98 | r = 0.86 ICC = 0.85 | 18.7 ± 12.2 | Inter: 0.4 ± 0.3 | |
| Grapsa et al.109 | Adults normal+PAH | 80 | r = 0.75 −3.7 mL LOA 52.6 mL | r = 0.74 | −1.3% LOA 12.5 | Inter: ICC 0.89 | 10.6% | ||
| Knowledge-based reconstruction | |||||||||
| Dragulescu et al.110 | Children with TOF | 30 | 100 | r = 0.99 | r = 0.99 | r = 0.87 | −2.5 ± 3.7 mL | Intra r = 0.997 Inter: r = 0.995 | |
| Dragulescu et al.104 | Children with TOF (40 vs. MRI) | 70 | 98 | r = 0.99 | r = 0.99 | r = 0.94 | 6.6 ± 10.7 | Intra: COV 3.4 Inter: COV 3.8 | |
| Kutty et al.111 | Adolescents and adults with systemic RV | 15 | 100 | r = 0.80 | r = 0.82 | r = 0.86 | −4.3% | Intra: 3.2% Inter: 4.6% | |
| Single-beat full-volume capture | Population | N | Feasibility (%) | EDV correlation/agreement with MRI | ESV correlation with MRI | EF correlation with MRI | Mean difference EDV | Reproducibility | Test–retest |
| Zhang et al.112 | adults normal and with cardiac dysfunction | 61 | 96.7 | r = 0.97 Bias: 2.16 LOA: 15.1 | r = 0.96 Bias: 2.6 LOA: 15.8 | r = 0.71 Bias: 0.86 LOA: 16 | 2 | Intra: ICC 0.97 Inter: ICC 0.97 | EDV ICC 0.96, mean difference −1.7 |
| Echo method and reference . | Population . | N . | Feasibility (%) . | EDV correlation/agreement with MRI . | ESV correlation with MRI . | EF correlation with MRI . | Mean difference EDV . | Reproducibility (EDV) ICC (%) or limits of agreement (mL) . | Test–retest . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method of discs | |||||||||
| Lu et al.98 | Healthy children | 20 | 85 | r = 0.98 | r = 0.96 | r = 0.89 | −3.2 ± 7.0 mL | Intra: 2.1 ± 5.3% Inter: 5.4 ± 9.2% | |
| Renella et al.99 | Varied, including normal and CHD | 70 | 58 | – | – | – | – | Intra: −1.9 mL (−5.1 to 1.3) Inter: −2.0 mL (−6.0 to 2.1) | −0.50 (−3.5 to 2.5) |
| Semi-automated border detection | |||||||||
| Maffessanti et al.100 | Healthy adults | 540 | 94 | – | – | – | – | Intraobserver COV 2–8.6% Interobserver COV 7–15% | – |
| Tamborini et al.101 | Healthy adults | 245 | 94 | – | – | – | −10 mL | Intra: 0.6 ± 5.1 Inter: 0.9 ± 20.3 | 0.2 ± 6.9 |
| Leibundgut et al.102 | Adults with cardiac dysfunction | 100 | 92 | r = 0.84 | r = 0.83 | r = 0.72 | −10 mL | Intra: ICC 0.93 Inter: ICC 0.95 | |
| Jenkins et al.103 | Adults with cardiac dysfunction | 54 | 93 | r = 0.6 | r = 0.55 | r = 0.78 | −3 ± 10 mL | Intra: r = 0.94, 1 ± 3 mL Inter: r = 0.76, 0 ± 10 | r = 0.91, 0 ± 5 |
| Dragulescu et al.104 | Children with CHD | 70 (36 vs. MRI) | 91 | r = 0.98 | r = 0.98 | r = 0.85 | 18.2 ± 17.8 | Intra: COV 5.4 Inter: 8 | |
| Khoo et al.17 | Children with CHD | 54 | 52 | r = 0.91 | r = 0.9 | r = 0.76 | −19.3 ± 6 14 | Inter: ICC 0.97, 11.6 ± 7.0 | |
| Grewal et al.105 | Adults with CHD | 25 | r = 0.88 | r = 0.89 | −9%, max 34% | Inter: 10% | |||
| Van der Zwaan et al.106,107 | Adults with CHD | 62 | 81 | r = 0.93 | r = 0.91 | r = 0.74 | 34 mL LOA −32 to 99 | Intra: 1 ± 12 Inter: ± | 7% |
| Iriart et al.108 | Adults with repaired TOF | 34 | 92 | r = 0.99 ICC = 0.99 | r = 0.98 ICC = 0.98 | r = 0.86 ICC = 0.85 | 18.7 ± 12.2 | Inter: 0.4 ± 0.3 | |
| Grapsa et al.109 | Adults normal+PAH | 80 | r = 0.75 −3.7 mL LOA 52.6 mL | r = 0.74 | −1.3% LOA 12.5 | Inter: ICC 0.89 | 10.6% | ||
| Knowledge-based reconstruction | |||||||||
| Dragulescu et al.110 | Children with TOF | 30 | 100 | r = 0.99 | r = 0.99 | r = 0.87 | −2.5 ± 3.7 mL | Intra r = 0.997 Inter: r = 0.995 | |
| Dragulescu et al.104 | Children with TOF (40 vs. MRI) | 70 | 98 | r = 0.99 | r = 0.99 | r = 0.94 | 6.6 ± 10.7 | Intra: COV 3.4 Inter: COV 3.8 | |
| Kutty et al.111 | Adolescents and adults with systemic RV | 15 | 100 | r = 0.80 | r = 0.82 | r = 0.86 | −4.3% | Intra: 3.2% Inter: 4.6% | |
| Single-beat full-volume capture | Population | N | Feasibility (%) | EDV correlation/agreement with MRI | ESV correlation with MRI | EF correlation with MRI | Mean difference EDV | Reproducibility | Test–retest |
| Zhang et al.112 | adults normal and with cardiac dysfunction | 61 | 96.7 | r = 0.97 Bias: 2.16 LOA: 15.1 | r = 0.96 Bias: 2.6 LOA: 15.8 | r = 0.71 Bias: 0.86 LOA: 16 | 2 | Intra: ICC 0.97 Inter: ICC 0.97 | EDV ICC 0.96, mean difference −1.7 |
EDV, end-diastolic volume; ESV, end-systolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; RV, right ventricle; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; Intra, intraobserver; Inter, interobserver; Bias, LOA, bias and limits of agreement between two methods assessed by Bland–Altman analysis; ICC, intra-class correlation coefficient.
Published data on estimation of RV volumes by different echocardiographic techniques compared with values derived from magnetic resonance imaging
| Echo method and reference . | Population . | N . | Feasibility (%) . | EDV correlation/agreement with MRI . | ESV correlation with MRI . | EF correlation with MRI . | Mean difference EDV . | Reproducibility (EDV) ICC (%) or limits of agreement (mL) . | Test–retest . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method of discs | |||||||||
| Lu et al.98 | Healthy children | 20 | 85 | r = 0.98 | r = 0.96 | r = 0.89 | −3.2 ± 7.0 mL | Intra: 2.1 ± 5.3% Inter: 5.4 ± 9.2% | |
| Renella et al.99 | Varied, including normal and CHD | 70 | 58 | – | – | – | – | Intra: −1.9 mL (−5.1 to 1.3) Inter: −2.0 mL (−6.0 to 2.1) | −0.50 (−3.5 to 2.5) |
| Semi-automated border detection | |||||||||
| Maffessanti et al.100 | Healthy adults | 540 | 94 | – | – | – | – | Intraobserver COV 2–8.6% Interobserver COV 7–15% | – |
| Tamborini et al.101 | Healthy adults | 245 | 94 | – | – | – | −10 mL | Intra: 0.6 ± 5.1 Inter: 0.9 ± 20.3 | 0.2 ± 6.9 |
| Leibundgut et al.102 | Adults with cardiac dysfunction | 100 | 92 | r = 0.84 | r = 0.83 | r = 0.72 | −10 mL | Intra: ICC 0.93 Inter: ICC 0.95 | |
| Jenkins et al.103 | Adults with cardiac dysfunction | 54 | 93 | r = 0.6 | r = 0.55 | r = 0.78 | −3 ± 10 mL | Intra: r = 0.94, 1 ± 3 mL Inter: r = 0.76, 0 ± 10 | r = 0.91, 0 ± 5 |
| Dragulescu et al.104 | Children with CHD | 70 (36 vs. MRI) | 91 | r = 0.98 | r = 0.98 | r = 0.85 | 18.2 ± 17.8 | Intra: COV 5.4 Inter: 8 | |
| Khoo et al.17 | Children with CHD | 54 | 52 | r = 0.91 | r = 0.9 | r = 0.76 | −19.3 ± 6 14 | Inter: ICC 0.97, 11.6 ± 7.0 | |
| Grewal et al.105 | Adults with CHD | 25 | r = 0.88 | r = 0.89 | −9%, max 34% | Inter: 10% | |||
| Van der Zwaan et al.106,107 | Adults with CHD | 62 | 81 | r = 0.93 | r = 0.91 | r = 0.74 | 34 mL LOA −32 to 99 | Intra: 1 ± 12 Inter: ± | 7% |
| Iriart et al.108 | Adults with repaired TOF | 34 | 92 | r = 0.99 ICC = 0.99 | r = 0.98 ICC = 0.98 | r = 0.86 ICC = 0.85 | 18.7 ± 12.2 | Inter: 0.4 ± 0.3 | |
| Grapsa et al.109 | Adults normal+PAH | 80 | r = 0.75 −3.7 mL LOA 52.6 mL | r = 0.74 | −1.3% LOA 12.5 | Inter: ICC 0.89 | 10.6% | ||
| Knowledge-based reconstruction | |||||||||
| Dragulescu et al.110 | Children with TOF | 30 | 100 | r = 0.99 | r = 0.99 | r = 0.87 | −2.5 ± 3.7 mL | Intra r = 0.997 Inter: r = 0.995 | |
| Dragulescu et al.104 | Children with TOF (40 vs. MRI) | 70 | 98 | r = 0.99 | r = 0.99 | r = 0.94 | 6.6 ± 10.7 | Intra: COV 3.4 Inter: COV 3.8 | |
| Kutty et al.111 | Adolescents and adults with systemic RV | 15 | 100 | r = 0.80 | r = 0.82 | r = 0.86 | −4.3% | Intra: 3.2% Inter: 4.6% | |
| Single-beat full-volume capture | Population | N | Feasibility (%) | EDV correlation/agreement with MRI | ESV correlation with MRI | EF correlation with MRI | Mean difference EDV | Reproducibility | Test–retest |
| Zhang et al.112 | adults normal and with cardiac dysfunction | 61 | 96.7 | r = 0.97 Bias: 2.16 LOA: 15.1 | r = 0.96 Bias: 2.6 LOA: 15.8 | r = 0.71 Bias: 0.86 LOA: 16 | 2 | Intra: ICC 0.97 Inter: ICC 0.97 | EDV ICC 0.96, mean difference −1.7 |
| Echo method and reference . | Population . | N . | Feasibility (%) . | EDV correlation/agreement with MRI . | ESV correlation with MRI . | EF correlation with MRI . | Mean difference EDV . | Reproducibility (EDV) ICC (%) or limits of agreement (mL) . | Test–retest . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method of discs | |||||||||
| Lu et al.98 | Healthy children | 20 | 85 | r = 0.98 | r = 0.96 | r = 0.89 | −3.2 ± 7.0 mL | Intra: 2.1 ± 5.3% Inter: 5.4 ± 9.2% | |
| Renella et al.99 | Varied, including normal and CHD | 70 | 58 | – | – | – | – | Intra: −1.9 mL (−5.1 to 1.3) Inter: −2.0 mL (−6.0 to 2.1) | −0.50 (−3.5 to 2.5) |
| Semi-automated border detection | |||||||||
| Maffessanti et al.100 | Healthy adults | 540 | 94 | – | – | – | – | Intraobserver COV 2–8.6% Interobserver COV 7–15% | – |
| Tamborini et al.101 | Healthy adults | 245 | 94 | – | – | – | −10 mL | Intra: 0.6 ± 5.1 Inter: 0.9 ± 20.3 | 0.2 ± 6.9 |
| Leibundgut et al.102 | Adults with cardiac dysfunction | 100 | 92 | r = 0.84 | r = 0.83 | r = 0.72 | −10 mL | Intra: ICC 0.93 Inter: ICC 0.95 | |
| Jenkins et al.103 | Adults with cardiac dysfunction | 54 | 93 | r = 0.6 | r = 0.55 | r = 0.78 | −3 ± 10 mL | Intra: r = 0.94, 1 ± 3 mL Inter: r = 0.76, 0 ± 10 | r = 0.91, 0 ± 5 |
| Dragulescu et al.104 | Children with CHD | 70 (36 vs. MRI) | 91 | r = 0.98 | r = 0.98 | r = 0.85 | 18.2 ± 17.8 | Intra: COV 5.4 Inter: 8 | |
| Khoo et al.17 | Children with CHD | 54 | 52 | r = 0.91 | r = 0.9 | r = 0.76 | −19.3 ± 6 14 | Inter: ICC 0.97, 11.6 ± 7.0 | |
| Grewal et al.105 | Adults with CHD | 25 | r = 0.88 | r = 0.89 | −9%, max 34% | Inter: 10% | |||
| Van der Zwaan et al.106,107 | Adults with CHD | 62 | 81 | r = 0.93 | r = 0.91 | r = 0.74 | 34 mL LOA −32 to 99 | Intra: 1 ± 12 Inter: ± | 7% |
| Iriart et al.108 | Adults with repaired TOF | 34 | 92 | r = 0.99 ICC = 0.99 | r = 0.98 ICC = 0.98 | r = 0.86 ICC = 0.85 | 18.7 ± 12.2 | Inter: 0.4 ± 0.3 | |
| Grapsa et al.109 | Adults normal+PAH | 80 | r = 0.75 −3.7 mL LOA 52.6 mL | r = 0.74 | −1.3% LOA 12.5 | Inter: ICC 0.89 | 10.6% | ||
| Knowledge-based reconstruction | |||||||||
| Dragulescu et al.110 | Children with TOF | 30 | 100 | r = 0.99 | r = 0.99 | r = 0.87 | −2.5 ± 3.7 mL | Intra r = 0.997 Inter: r = 0.995 | |
| Dragulescu et al.104 | Children with TOF (40 vs. MRI) | 70 | 98 | r = 0.99 | r = 0.99 | r = 0.94 | 6.6 ± 10.7 | Intra: COV 3.4 Inter: COV 3.8 | |
| Kutty et al.111 | Adolescents and adults with systemic RV | 15 | 100 | r = 0.80 | r = 0.82 | r = 0.86 | −4.3% | Intra: 3.2% Inter: 4.6% | |
| Single-beat full-volume capture | Population | N | Feasibility (%) | EDV correlation/agreement with MRI | ESV correlation with MRI | EF correlation with MRI | Mean difference EDV | Reproducibility | Test–retest |
| Zhang et al.112 | adults normal and with cardiac dysfunction | 61 | 96.7 | r = 0.97 Bias: 2.16 LOA: 15.1 | r = 0.96 Bias: 2.6 LOA: 15.8 | r = 0.71 Bias: 0.86 LOA: 16 | 2 | Intra: ICC 0.97 Inter: ICC 0.97 | EDV ICC 0.96, mean difference −1.7 |
EDV, end-diastolic volume; ESV, end-systolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; RV, right ventricle; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; Intra, intraobserver; Inter, interobserver; Bias, LOA, bias and limits of agreement between two methods assessed by Bland–Altman analysis; ICC, intra-class correlation coefficient.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
