Figure 4.
 Comparison of the sensitivity between FANSe and Bowtie by mapping of in silico simulated datasets. ( A ) Sensitivity of mapping indel-free reads from the E. coli genome and masked human chromosome 21 reference sequence. FANSe was run with 6-nt seeds. ( B ) Sensitivity of mapping reads from the E. coli genome with a 1% substitution rate and an indel rate ranging from 0.5% to 4%. Indel search is enabled. All tests with Bowtie were run with three mismatch allowance. MM, mismatches.

Comparison of the sensitivity between FANSe and Bowtie by mapping of in silico simulated datasets. ( A ) Sensitivity of mapping indel-free reads from the E. coli genome and masked human chromosome 21 reference sequence. FANSe was run with 6-nt seeds. ( B ) Sensitivity of mapping reads from the E. coli genome with a 1% substitution rate and an indel rate ranging from 0.5% to 4%. Indel search is enabled. All tests with Bowtie were run with three mismatch allowance. MM, mismatches.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close