Figure 3.
Physiological performance of the transgenic lines LOHi and LN compared with the wild type (WT) under control and drought stress conditions. A, Relative leaf water content (RWC) estimated at 4 DAS. B and C, Assimilation rate and calculated instantaneous WUE (assimilation [A]/transpiration [E]) in the wild type and transgenic plants. Mean values ± se are given with n = 15 for all the parameters. White and filled bars represent control and stress conditions, respectively. Statistical significant differences among genotypes and a given treatment have been calculated using one-way ANOVA at α = 0.01 with Tukey’s posthoc test. Letters a, b, and c and x, y, and z represent statistical differences under control and stress conditions, respectively. Additional information of two-way ANOVA is provided in Supplemental Table S4.

Physiological performance of the transgenic lines LOHi and LN compared with the wild type (WT) under control and drought stress conditions. A, Relative leaf water content (RWC) estimated at 4 DAS. B and C, Assimilation rate and calculated instantaneous WUE (assimilation [A]/transpiration [E]) in the wild type and transgenic plants. Mean values ± se are given with n = 15 for all the parameters. White and filled bars represent control and stress conditions, respectively. Statistical significant differences among genotypes and a given treatment have been calculated using one-way ANOVA at α = 0.01 with Tukey’s posthoc test. Letters a, b, and c and x, y, and z represent statistical differences under control and stress conditions, respectively. Additional information of two-way ANOVA is provided in Supplemental Table S4.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close