Figure 5.
Relationship of loss of leaf thickness at TLP with pressure-volume curve parameters and leaf structural traits for 14 species of diverse leaf form and texture and drought tolerance. A to E show traits plotted against the percentage loss of leaf thickness at TLP: leaf osmotic potential at full turgor (A), leaf osmotic potential at TLP (B), ε (C), LMA (D), and leaf density (E). F to O show the intercorrelation of those five traits. Species native to moist habitats are represented in white, woody species from dry habitats are represented in black, and herbs from dry habitats are represented in gray. Fitted standardized major axes are as follows:  for A,  for B,  for C,  for D,  for E,  for F,  for G,  for H,  for I,  for J,  for K,  for L,  for M,  for N, and  for O. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Relationship of loss of leaf thickness at TLP with pressure-volume curve parameters and leaf structural traits for 14 species of diverse leaf form and texture and drought tolerance. A to E show traits plotted against the percentage loss of leaf thickness at TLP: leaf osmotic potential at full turgor (A), leaf osmotic potential at TLP (B), ε (C), LMA (D), and leaf density (E). F to O show the intercorrelation of those five traits. Species native to moist habitats are represented in white, woody species from dry habitats are represented in black, and herbs from dry habitats are represented in gray. Fitted standardized major axes are as follows: formula for A, formula for B, formula for C, formula for D, formula for E, formula for F, formula for G, formula for H, formula for I, formula for J, formula for K, formula for L, formula for M, formula for N, and formula for O. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close