Figure 3
Neuroimaging results using different lesion-symptom mapping approaches showing the lesion correlates associated with coherence deficits. MNI coordinates of slices from left to right: Z = −6, 1, 9. (A) VBCM results (blue clusters) thresholded at P < 0.001 voxel-wise and FWE cluster-corrected at P < 0.05. (B) SVR-LSM results (red clusters) showing the significant beta weights after 100 00 permutation testing, P < 0.005 voxel-wise and P < 0.05 cluster-wise for the model without lesion volume correction (left); and the model with lesion volume correction showing the significant beta weights after 100 00 permutation testing, P < 0.05 voxel-wise and P < 0.05 cluster-wise (right). A grey surface in this figure indicates that no significant results were found for the respective approach

Neuroimaging results using different lesion-symptom mapping approaches showing the lesion correlates associated with coherence deficits. MNI coordinates of slices from left to right: Z = −6, 1, 9. (A) VBCM results (blue clusters) thresholded at P < 0.001 voxel-wise and FWE cluster-corrected at P < 0.05. (B) SVR-LSM results (red clusters) showing the significant beta weights after 100 00 permutation testing, P < 0.005 voxel-wise and P < 0.05 cluster-wise for the model without lesion volume correction (left); and the model with lesion volume correction showing the significant beta weights after 100 00 permutation testing, P < 0.05 voxel-wise and P < 0.05 cluster-wise (right). A grey surface in this figure indicates that no significant results were found for the respective approach

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close